Assessing Nonverbal Same/Different Judgments of Auditory Stimuli in Individuals with Intellectual Disabilities: A Methodological Investigation.

Richard W Serna, Mark A Preston, G Brooks Thompson
{"title":"Assessing Nonverbal Same/Different Judgments of Auditory Stimuli in Individuals with Intellectual Disabilities: A Methodological Investigation.","authors":"Richard W Serna,&nbsp;Mark A Preston,&nbsp;G Brooks Thompson","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This methodological paper reports an initial attempt to evaluate the feasibility and utility of a nonverbal task for assessing generalized same/different judgments of auditory stimuli in individuals who have intellectual disabilities. Study 1 asked whether participants could readily acquire a baseline of auditory same/different, go-left/go-right performance with minimal prompting. Sample stimuli consisted of pairs of successively presented sine-wave tones. If the tones were identical, participants were reinforced for selections of a visual stimulus on the left side of the computer screen; if the two stimuli were different, selections of the visual stimulus on the right were reinforced. Two of five participants readily acquired the task, generalized performance to other stimuli and completed a rudimentary protocol for examining auditory discriminations that are potentially more difficult than those used to establish the initial task. In Study 2, two participants who could not perform the go-left/go-right task with tone stimuli, but could do so with spoken-word stimuli, successfully transferred control by spoken words to tones via an auditory superimposition-and-fading procedure. The findings support the feasibility of using the task as a general-purpose auditory discrimination assessment.</p>","PeriodicalId":89846,"journal":{"name":"Revista brasileira de analise do comportamento","volume":"5 2","pages":"69-87"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3624748/pdf/nihms396997.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista brasileira de analise do comportamento","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This methodological paper reports an initial attempt to evaluate the feasibility and utility of a nonverbal task for assessing generalized same/different judgments of auditory stimuli in individuals who have intellectual disabilities. Study 1 asked whether participants could readily acquire a baseline of auditory same/different, go-left/go-right performance with minimal prompting. Sample stimuli consisted of pairs of successively presented sine-wave tones. If the tones were identical, participants were reinforced for selections of a visual stimulus on the left side of the computer screen; if the two stimuli were different, selections of the visual stimulus on the right were reinforced. Two of five participants readily acquired the task, generalized performance to other stimuli and completed a rudimentary protocol for examining auditory discriminations that are potentially more difficult than those used to establish the initial task. In Study 2, two participants who could not perform the go-left/go-right task with tone stimuli, but could do so with spoken-word stimuli, successfully transferred control by spoken words to tones via an auditory superimposition-and-fading procedure. The findings support the feasibility of using the task as a general-purpose auditory discrimination assessment.

评估智障人士对听觉刺激的非语言相同/不同判断:一项方法学研究。
这篇方法学论文报告了一项初步尝试,旨在评估非语言任务用于评估智力残疾个体对听觉刺激的一般相同/不同判断的可行性和实用性。研究1询问参与者是否可以在最小提示下轻松获得听觉相同/不同、向左/向右的基线。样本刺激由成对连续呈现的正弦波音调组成。如果音调是相同的,参与者被加强了对计算机屏幕左侧视觉刺激的选择;如果两种刺激不同,则强化对右侧视觉刺激的选择。五名参与者中有两名很快就完成了任务,将表现推广到其他刺激上,并完成了一个基本的测试听觉辨别的协议,这个协议可能比用于建立初始任务的测试更困难。在研究2中,两名不能在音调刺激下执行左/右任务,但可以在口语刺激下执行左/右任务的参与者,通过听觉叠加-衰落过程成功地将口语控制转移到音调上。研究结果支持将该任务用作通用听觉辨别评估的可行性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书