Comparison of Clinical Outcomes and Radiographic Measurements in 4 Different Treatment Modalities for Osteoporotic Compression Fractures: Retrospective Analysis.

Q Medicine
Gerard Wen Wei Ee, Jiang Lei, Chang Ming Guo, William Yeo, Seang Beng Tan, Phak Boon Benjamin Tow, Li Tat John Chen, Wai-Mun Yue
{"title":"Comparison of Clinical Outcomes and Radiographic Measurements in 4 Different Treatment Modalities for Osteoporotic Compression Fractures: Retrospective Analysis.","authors":"Gerard Wen Wei Ee,&nbsp;Jiang Lei,&nbsp;Chang Ming Guo,&nbsp;William Yeo,&nbsp;Seang Beng Tan,&nbsp;Phak Boon Benjamin Tow,&nbsp;Li Tat John Chen,&nbsp;Wai-Mun Yue","doi":"10.1097/BSD.0b013e31828f940c","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>We conducted a retrospective analysis of a prospectively collected database in a tertiary hospital over 10 years.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Treatment for vertebral compression fractures remains an area of controversy with respect to timing and type of surgical management. We analyzed the clinical outcomes and radiographic measurements of 4 different modalities of treatment for these fractures.</p><p><strong>Summary of background data: </strong>From 2001 to 2011, we analyzed a total of 363 patients after failure of 30 days of conservative management. These patients were then further managed either conservatively or with vertebroplasty, balloon kyphoplasty, or sky bone expander. Outcomes were assessed by using self-report measures: Visual Analog Score; functional measures: Oswestry Disability Index and Short-Form 36; and physiological measures: preoperative and postoperative radiographs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The outcome measures were assessed for 6 months for those treated conservatively and up till 2 years for those treated surgically. Radiographic measurements of the spine were correlated with the clinical outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 62 patients (12.1%) were treated conservatively, 148 (40.8%) with vertebroplasty, 97 (26.7%) with balloon kyphoplasty, and 56 (15.4%) with sky bone expander. We found significant improvements in Visual Analog Score, Oswestry Disability Index, and Short-Form-36 scores for all groups after 1-month follow-up (P<0.05), with the surgical groups demonstrating a greater improvement in pain scores after the first postoperative day (P<0.0001) when compared with the conservative group. The improvements in outcomes in those treated surgically were sustained for up to 2 years with no significant difference (P>0.05) among the surgical groups. We also found significant improvement (P<0.005) in anterior vertebral and kyphotic wedge angle after surgical intervention.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We have shown that early surgical intervention allows for quicker pain relief compared with conservative treatment, with similar improvements in anterior vertebral height and kyphotic wedge angle between all 3 groups of surgical management.</p>","PeriodicalId":50043,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Spinal Disorders & Techniques","volume":"28 6","pages":"E328-35"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1097/BSD.0b013e31828f940c","citationCount":"18","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Spinal Disorders & Techniques","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/BSD.0b013e31828f940c","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 18

Abstract

Study design: We conducted a retrospective analysis of a prospectively collected database in a tertiary hospital over 10 years.

Objective: Treatment for vertebral compression fractures remains an area of controversy with respect to timing and type of surgical management. We analyzed the clinical outcomes and radiographic measurements of 4 different modalities of treatment for these fractures.

Summary of background data: From 2001 to 2011, we analyzed a total of 363 patients after failure of 30 days of conservative management. These patients were then further managed either conservatively or with vertebroplasty, balloon kyphoplasty, or sky bone expander. Outcomes were assessed by using self-report measures: Visual Analog Score; functional measures: Oswestry Disability Index and Short-Form 36; and physiological measures: preoperative and postoperative radiographs.

Methods: The outcome measures were assessed for 6 months for those treated conservatively and up till 2 years for those treated surgically. Radiographic measurements of the spine were correlated with the clinical outcomes.

Results: A total of 62 patients (12.1%) were treated conservatively, 148 (40.8%) with vertebroplasty, 97 (26.7%) with balloon kyphoplasty, and 56 (15.4%) with sky bone expander. We found significant improvements in Visual Analog Score, Oswestry Disability Index, and Short-Form-36 scores for all groups after 1-month follow-up (P<0.05), with the surgical groups demonstrating a greater improvement in pain scores after the first postoperative day (P<0.0001) when compared with the conservative group. The improvements in outcomes in those treated surgically were sustained for up to 2 years with no significant difference (P>0.05) among the surgical groups. We also found significant improvement (P<0.005) in anterior vertebral and kyphotic wedge angle after surgical intervention.

Conclusions: We have shown that early surgical intervention allows for quicker pain relief compared with conservative treatment, with similar improvements in anterior vertebral height and kyphotic wedge angle between all 3 groups of surgical management.

骨质疏松性压缩性骨折4种不同治疗方式的临床疗效及影像学指标比较:回顾性分析。
研究设计:我们对一家三级医院10年来前瞻性收集的数据库进行回顾性分析。目的:椎体压缩性骨折的治疗仍然是一个有争议的领域,关于手术治疗的时机和类型。我们分析了这些骨折的4种不同治疗方式的临床结果和影像学测量。背景资料总结:从2001年到2011年,我们共分析了363例保守治疗30天失败的患者。这些患者随后进行保守治疗或椎体成形术、球囊后凸成形术或天空骨扩张术。采用自我报告方法评估结果:视觉模拟评分;功能指标:Oswestry残疾指数和简表36;生理测量:术前和术后x线片。方法:保守治疗组随访6个月,手术治疗组随访2年。脊柱x线测量与临床结果相关。结果:保守治疗62例(12.1%),椎体成形术148例(40.8%),球囊后凸成形术97例(26.7%),天空扩骨器56例(15.4%)。随访1个月后,两组患者的视觉模拟评分、Oswestry残疾指数和Short-Form-36评分均有显著改善(P0.05)。我们也发现了显著的改善(结论:我们已经表明,与保守治疗相比,早期手术干预可以更快地缓解疼痛,在所有三组手术处理之间,前椎体高度和后凸楔角的改善相似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.16
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Spinal Disorders & Techniques features peer-reviewed original articles on diagnosis, management, and surgery for spinal problems. Topics include degenerative disorders, spinal trauma, diagnostic anesthetic blocks, metastatic tumor spinal replacements, management of pain syndromes, and the use of imaging techniques in evaluating lumbar spine disorder. The journal also presents thoroughly documented case reports.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信