Prospective Comparison Study Between the Fluoroscopy-guided and Navigation Coupled With O-arm-guided Pedicle Screw Placement in the Thoracic and Lumbosacral Spines.

Q Medicine
Myung-Hoon Shin, Jung-Woo Hur, Kyeong-Sik Ryu, Chun-Kun Park
{"title":"Prospective Comparison Study Between the Fluoroscopy-guided and Navigation Coupled With O-arm-guided Pedicle Screw Placement in the Thoracic and Lumbosacral Spines.","authors":"Myung-Hoon Shin,&nbsp;Jung-Woo Hur,&nbsp;Kyeong-Sik Ryu,&nbsp;Chun-Kun Park","doi":"10.1097/BSD.0b013e31829047a7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>This is a prospective randomized comparison study between the fluoroscopy-guided and navigation coupled with O-arm-guided pedicle screw placement in the thoracic and lumbosacral spines.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of the study was to evaluate the accuracy and clinical benefits of a navigation coupled with O-arm-guided method in the thoracic and lumbar spines by comparing with a C-arm fluoroscopy-guided method.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Under fluoroscopy guidance, 138 pedicle screws were inserted from T9 to S1 in 20 patients, and 124 pedicle screws were inserted from T9 to S1 in 20 patients using the navigation. The position of the screws within the pedicle was assessed from grade 0 (no violation cortex) to grade 3 (>4 mm violation), and the location of the violated cortex was determined. Preparation time of each equipment setting, time for screwing, and the number of x-ray shots were evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The number of screws observed as grade 0 was 121 (87.7%) in the fluoroscopy-guided group and 114 (91.9%) in the navigation-guided group. The lateral cortex was most commonly involved in the fluoroscopy-guided group (6 cases, 35.3%), and the medial cortex was most common in the navigation-guided group (4 cases, 40%). The mean time required for preparation for screw placement was 3.7 minutes in the fluoroscopy-guided group and 14.2 minutes in the navigation-guided group. Average screwing time was 3.6 minutes in the fluoroscopy-guided group and 4.3 minutes in the navigation-guided group. The mean number of x-ray shots for each screw placement in the fluoroscopy-guided group was 6.5. Postoperatively, 2 patients with misplacement of a screw under fluoroscopy guidance presented ipsilateral leg paresthesia, possibly related to the screw position.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The present prospective study reveals that the pedicle screw placement guided by the navigation coupled with O-arm system was more accurate and safer than that under fluoroscopy guidance.</p>","PeriodicalId":50043,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Spinal Disorders & Techniques","volume":"28 6","pages":"E347-51"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1097/BSD.0b013e31829047a7","citationCount":"77","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Spinal Disorders & Techniques","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/BSD.0b013e31829047a7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 77

Abstract

Study design: This is a prospective randomized comparison study between the fluoroscopy-guided and navigation coupled with O-arm-guided pedicle screw placement in the thoracic and lumbosacral spines.

Objective: The objective of the study was to evaluate the accuracy and clinical benefits of a navigation coupled with O-arm-guided method in the thoracic and lumbar spines by comparing with a C-arm fluoroscopy-guided method.

Methods: Under fluoroscopy guidance, 138 pedicle screws were inserted from T9 to S1 in 20 patients, and 124 pedicle screws were inserted from T9 to S1 in 20 patients using the navigation. The position of the screws within the pedicle was assessed from grade 0 (no violation cortex) to grade 3 (>4 mm violation), and the location of the violated cortex was determined. Preparation time of each equipment setting, time for screwing, and the number of x-ray shots were evaluated.

Results: The number of screws observed as grade 0 was 121 (87.7%) in the fluoroscopy-guided group and 114 (91.9%) in the navigation-guided group. The lateral cortex was most commonly involved in the fluoroscopy-guided group (6 cases, 35.3%), and the medial cortex was most common in the navigation-guided group (4 cases, 40%). The mean time required for preparation for screw placement was 3.7 minutes in the fluoroscopy-guided group and 14.2 minutes in the navigation-guided group. Average screwing time was 3.6 minutes in the fluoroscopy-guided group and 4.3 minutes in the navigation-guided group. The mean number of x-ray shots for each screw placement in the fluoroscopy-guided group was 6.5. Postoperatively, 2 patients with misplacement of a screw under fluoroscopy guidance presented ipsilateral leg paresthesia, possibly related to the screw position.

Conclusions: The present prospective study reveals that the pedicle screw placement guided by the navigation coupled with O-arm system was more accurate and safer than that under fluoroscopy guidance.

透视引导与导航联合o型臂引导椎弓根螺钉置入胸椎和腰骶椎的前瞻性比较研究。
研究设计:这是一项前瞻性随机比较研究,比较透视引导和导航结合o型臂引导椎弓根螺钉置入胸椎和腰骶骨。目的:本研究的目的是通过与c臂透视引导方法比较,评估导航联合o臂引导方法在胸椎和腰椎的准确性和临床益处。方法:在透视引导下,20例患者从T9至S1置入138枚椎弓根螺钉,20例患者采用导航从T9至S1置入124枚椎弓根螺钉。螺钉在椎弓根内的位置从0级(无侵犯皮质)到3级(>4 mm侵犯皮质)评估,并确定侵犯皮质的位置。评估每台设备设置的准备时间、旋紧时间、x线拍摄次数。结果:透视引导组0级螺钉121颗(87.7%),导航引导组114颗(91.9%)。透视引导组以外侧皮层受累最多(6例,35.3%),导航引导组以内侧皮层受累最多(4例,40%)。在透视引导组和导航引导组中,准备置钉所需的平均时间分别为3.7分钟和14.2分钟。透视引导组平均旋紧时间3.6分钟,导航引导组平均旋紧时间4.3分钟。在透视引导组中,每次放置螺钉的x线平均次数为6.5次。术后,2例患者在透视引导下螺钉错位,出现同侧腿感觉异常,可能与螺钉位置有关。结论:本前瞻性研究显示导航联合o型臂系统导引下置入椎弓根螺钉比透视导引下置入更准确、更安全。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.16
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Spinal Disorders & Techniques features peer-reviewed original articles on diagnosis, management, and surgery for spinal problems. Topics include degenerative disorders, spinal trauma, diagnostic anesthetic blocks, metastatic tumor spinal replacements, management of pain syndromes, and the use of imaging techniques in evaluating lumbar spine disorder. The journal also presents thoroughly documented case reports.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信