Advantage of Pedicle Screw Placement Into the Sacral Promontory (Tricortical Purchase) on Lumbosacral Fixation.

Q Medicine
Minori Kato, Hiroshi Taneichi, Kota Suda
{"title":"Advantage of Pedicle Screw Placement Into the Sacral Promontory (Tricortical Purchase) on Lumbosacral Fixation.","authors":"Minori Kato,&nbsp;Hiroshi Taneichi,&nbsp;Kota Suda","doi":"10.1097/BSD.0b013e31828ffc70","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective clinical study.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the clinical outcome of the tricortical method for lumbosacral fixation.</p><p><strong>Summary of background data: </strong>Despite advances in surgical techniques, failure to achieve solid arthrodesis of the lumbosacral junction continues to be significant clinical problems. To overcome these problems, tricortical purchase fixation has recently been advocated and studied. In this method, a trajectory directly into the medial sacral promontory is used to gain purchase in the dorsal, anterior, and superior cortices. This fixation method has been shown to double the insertional torque of the classic bicortical technique.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients who had undergone lumbosacral fixation were included in this study. The average area of fusion was 1.7 segments. The patients were divided into a tricortical fixation group (TF, n=98) and a nontricortical fixation group (non-TF, n=33). We examined clinical outcome [Japanese Orthopaedic Association scoring system (JOA score)], fusion status, and the characteristics and safety of pedicle screwing in both groups. To identify risk factors for postoperative loss of lordosis (postoperative loss of >5 degrees in L5/S1 disk angle), risk factor analysis was performed by multivariate logistic regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In TF and non-TF, the JOA score changed from 13.4 and 13.8 points at surgery to 24.9 and 23.8 points, respectively, at final follow-up, and the recovery rate was 73.7% and 64.2%, respectively. Pseudoarthrosis of the fused L5/S1 occurred in 3 patients in whom the lumbosacral spine had not been fixed by tricortical purchase. The screw angle was 22.0 and 16.1 degrees in TF and non-TF, respectively, that is, a significant difference was shown. Significantly fewer TF cases encountered the risk of injured vascular tissue compared with non-TF. Non-TF (OR, 3.37) and correction of the L5/S1 disk angle (OR, 1.11) were significant risk factors for postoperative loss of lordosis.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In patients who underwent short-segment lumbosacral fusion, TF enhanced postoperative stability at the lumbosacral junction. Pseudoarthrosis did not occur in patients who underwent TF, and the risk of vascular injury was less. TF is regarded as a successful technique in short-segment lumbosacral fixation.</p>","PeriodicalId":50043,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Spinal Disorders & Techniques","volume":"28 6","pages":"E336-42"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1097/BSD.0b013e31828ffc70","citationCount":"14","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Spinal Disorders & Techniques","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/BSD.0b013e31828ffc70","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

Abstract

Study design: Retrospective clinical study.

Objective: To evaluate the clinical outcome of the tricortical method for lumbosacral fixation.

Summary of background data: Despite advances in surgical techniques, failure to achieve solid arthrodesis of the lumbosacral junction continues to be significant clinical problems. To overcome these problems, tricortical purchase fixation has recently been advocated and studied. In this method, a trajectory directly into the medial sacral promontory is used to gain purchase in the dorsal, anterior, and superior cortices. This fixation method has been shown to double the insertional torque of the classic bicortical technique.

Methods: Patients who had undergone lumbosacral fixation were included in this study. The average area of fusion was 1.7 segments. The patients were divided into a tricortical fixation group (TF, n=98) and a nontricortical fixation group (non-TF, n=33). We examined clinical outcome [Japanese Orthopaedic Association scoring system (JOA score)], fusion status, and the characteristics and safety of pedicle screwing in both groups. To identify risk factors for postoperative loss of lordosis (postoperative loss of >5 degrees in L5/S1 disk angle), risk factor analysis was performed by multivariate logistic regression.

Results: In TF and non-TF, the JOA score changed from 13.4 and 13.8 points at surgery to 24.9 and 23.8 points, respectively, at final follow-up, and the recovery rate was 73.7% and 64.2%, respectively. Pseudoarthrosis of the fused L5/S1 occurred in 3 patients in whom the lumbosacral spine had not been fixed by tricortical purchase. The screw angle was 22.0 and 16.1 degrees in TF and non-TF, respectively, that is, a significant difference was shown. Significantly fewer TF cases encountered the risk of injured vascular tissue compared with non-TF. Non-TF (OR, 3.37) and correction of the L5/S1 disk angle (OR, 1.11) were significant risk factors for postoperative loss of lordosis.

Conclusions: In patients who underwent short-segment lumbosacral fusion, TF enhanced postoperative stability at the lumbosacral junction. Pseudoarthrosis did not occur in patients who underwent TF, and the risk of vascular injury was less. TF is regarded as a successful technique in short-segment lumbosacral fixation.

椎弓根螺钉置入骶骨角(三皮质置钉)在腰骶固定中的优势。
研究设计:回顾性临床研究。目的:评价三皮层法腰骶固定的临床效果。背景资料总结:尽管手术技术不断进步,但未能实现腰骶交界处的实体关节融合术仍然是重要的临床问题。为了克服这些问题,最近人们开始提倡和研究大脑三皮层购买固定。在这种方法中,使用直接进入骶骨内侧岬的轨迹来获得背皮质、前皮质和上皮质的购买。这种固定方法已被证明是经典双皮质技术的两倍插入扭矩。方法:采用腰骶固定术的患者为研究对象。平均融合面积为1.7节段。将患者分为三皮质固定组(n =98)和非三皮质固定组(n =33)。我们检查了两组患者的临床结果[日本骨科协会评分系统(JOA评分)]、融合状态以及椎弓根螺钉固定的特点和安全性。为确定术后前凸消失(术后L5/S1椎间盘角度消失>5度)的危险因素,采用多因素logistic回归进行危险因素分析。结果:TF组和非TF组JOA评分分别由手术时的13.4分和13.8分提高到最终随访时的24.9分和23.8分,恢复率分别为73.7%和64.2%。合并的L5/S1假关节发生在3例腰骶椎未经三皮层固定的患者中。TF组和非TF组的螺钉角度分别为22.0度和16.1度,差异有统计学意义。与非TF患者相比,TF患者出现血管组织损伤的风险明显减少。非tf (OR, 3.37)和L5/S1椎间盘角度矫正(OR, 1.11)是术后前凸消失的重要危险因素。结论:在接受短节段腰骶融合的患者中,TF增强了腰骶交界处的术后稳定性。假关节没有发生在接受TF的患者中,血管损伤的风险更小。TF被认为是短节段腰骶固定的成功技术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.16
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Spinal Disorders & Techniques features peer-reviewed original articles on diagnosis, management, and surgery for spinal problems. Topics include degenerative disorders, spinal trauma, diagnostic anesthetic blocks, metastatic tumor spinal replacements, management of pain syndromes, and the use of imaging techniques in evaluating lumbar spine disorder. The journal also presents thoroughly documented case reports.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信