Computerized ellipse method for measuring acetabular version after total hip replacement--a precision study using synthetic and real radiographs.

Q Medicine
Computer Aided Surgery Pub Date : 2013-01-01 Epub Date: 2013-03-25 DOI:10.3109/10929088.2013.779749
Chen-Kun Liaw, Tai-Yin Wu, Sheng-Mou Hou, Rong-Sen Yang, Kao-Shang Shih, Chiou-Shann Fuh
{"title":"Computerized ellipse method for measuring acetabular version after total hip replacement--a precision study using synthetic and real radiographs.","authors":"Chen-Kun Liaw,&nbsp;Tai-Yin Wu,&nbsp;Sheng-Mou Hou,&nbsp;Rong-Sen Yang,&nbsp;Kao-Shang Shih,&nbsp;Chiou-Shann Fuh","doi":"10.3109/10929088.2013.779749","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Previous work by our group to address the problem of acetabular positioning based on 2D methods resulted in the development of a measurement method with better precision--Liaw's version. This method may help the early diagnosis of acetabular loosening. In the present study, we hypothesized that our computerized ellipse method could improve the precision of measuring acetabular version.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We developed our Elliversion software to measure acetabular version. Using total hip replacement (THR) Simulator, 96 radiographs were synthesized with random femoral inclination and 5° to 52° version, half with the femoral head included and half without. These synthetic radiographs and 28 real radiographs were measured with both Elliversion and the trigonometric method twice by one of the authors with a one-week interval between measurements. We then calculated the difference in the repeated measurements. Student's t-test was used for statistical analysis of the measuring error and inter-measurement difference.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the precision study, for synthetic radiographs including the femoral head, the ellipse method was significantly better than the trigonometric method (p < 0.01). For synthetic radiographs without the femoral head, there was no significant difference between the ellipse method and the trigonometric method (p = 0.19). As for the repeated measurements, for synthetic radiographs including the femoral head, the ellipse method was significantly better than the trigonometric method (p = 0.001), whereas for synthetic radiographs without the femoral head, there was no significant difference between the two methods (p = 0.17). For real radiographs, there was no significant difference between the two measuring methods (p = 0.12). However, if we excluded the four poor-quality radiographs, there was a significant difference between the two measuring methods (p = 0.04).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>We developed a computerized ellipse method for measuring acetabular version on synthetic radiographs and good-quality real radiographs. This method is characterized by its superior precision as compared to the trigonometric method. With the 2D standardized method (Liaw's version), improving the precision of measurement will help earlier diagnosis of acetabular loosening.</p>","PeriodicalId":50644,"journal":{"name":"Computer Aided Surgery","volume":"18 5-6","pages":"195-200"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3109/10929088.2013.779749","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computer Aided Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3109/10929088.2013.779749","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2013/3/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Background: Previous work by our group to address the problem of acetabular positioning based on 2D methods resulted in the development of a measurement method with better precision--Liaw's version. This method may help the early diagnosis of acetabular loosening. In the present study, we hypothesized that our computerized ellipse method could improve the precision of measuring acetabular version.

Methods: We developed our Elliversion software to measure acetabular version. Using total hip replacement (THR) Simulator, 96 radiographs were synthesized with random femoral inclination and 5° to 52° version, half with the femoral head included and half without. These synthetic radiographs and 28 real radiographs were measured with both Elliversion and the trigonometric method twice by one of the authors with a one-week interval between measurements. We then calculated the difference in the repeated measurements. Student's t-test was used for statistical analysis of the measuring error and inter-measurement difference.

Results: In the precision study, for synthetic radiographs including the femoral head, the ellipse method was significantly better than the trigonometric method (p < 0.01). For synthetic radiographs without the femoral head, there was no significant difference between the ellipse method and the trigonometric method (p = 0.19). As for the repeated measurements, for synthetic radiographs including the femoral head, the ellipse method was significantly better than the trigonometric method (p = 0.001), whereas for synthetic radiographs without the femoral head, there was no significant difference between the two methods (p = 0.17). For real radiographs, there was no significant difference between the two measuring methods (p = 0.12). However, if we excluded the four poor-quality radiographs, there was a significant difference between the two measuring methods (p = 0.04).

Discussion: We developed a computerized ellipse method for measuring acetabular version on synthetic radiographs and good-quality real radiographs. This method is characterized by its superior precision as compared to the trigonometric method. With the 2D standardized method (Liaw's version), improving the precision of measurement will help earlier diagnosis of acetabular loosening.

计算机椭圆法测量全髋关节置换术后髋臼屈曲度——一项使用合成和真实x线片的精确研究。
背景:本课题组前期研究了基于二维方法的髋臼定位问题,开发了一种精度更高的测量方法——Liaw版本。该方法有助于髋臼松动的早期诊断。在本研究中,我们假设我们的计算机化椭圆法可以提高测量髋臼版本的精度。方法:我们开发了自己的Elliversion软件来测量髋臼屈曲度。采用全髋关节置换术(THR)模拟器,合成96张随机股骨倾斜和5°至52°版本的x线片,其中一半包含股骨头,一半不包含股骨头。这些合成x光片和28张真实x光片由一位作者用椭圆和三角法测量了两次,测量间隔一周。然后我们计算重复测量的差值。采用学生t检验对测量误差和测量间差异进行统计分析。结果:在精度研究中,对于包括股骨头在内的合成x线片,椭圆法明显优于三角法(p < 0.01)。对于不含股骨头的合成x线片,椭圆法与三角法无显著性差异(p = 0.19)。在重复测量方面,对于包含股骨头的合成x线片,椭圆法明显优于三角法(p = 0.001),而对于不包含股骨头的合成x线片,两种方法之间无显著差异(p = 0.17)。对于真实x线片,两种测量方法之间无显著差异(p = 0.12)。然而,如果我们排除了4张质量较差的x线片,两种测量方法之间存在显著差异(p = 0.04)。讨论:我们开发了一种计算机化的椭圆方法来测量合成x线片和高质量的真实x线片上的髋臼版本。与三角法相比,这种方法的特点是精度更高。采用二维标准化方法(Liaw版本),提高测量精度有助于髋臼松动的早期诊断。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Computer Aided Surgery
Computer Aided Surgery 医学-外科
CiteScore
0.75
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The scope of Computer Aided Surgery encompasses all fields within surgery, as well as biomedical imaging and instrumentation, and digital technology employed as an adjunct to imaging in diagnosis, therapeutics, and surgery. Topics featured include frameless as well as conventional stereotaxic procedures, surgery guided by ultrasound, image guided focal irradiation, robotic surgery, and other therapeutic interventions that are performed with the use of digital imaging technology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信