Disc degeneration after disc herniation: are we accelerating the process?

Josh E Schroeder, Joseph R Dettori, Erika D Brodt, Leon Kaplan
{"title":"Disc degeneration after disc herniation: are we accelerating the process?","authors":"Josh E Schroeder,&nbsp;Joseph R Dettori,&nbsp;Erika D Brodt,&nbsp;Leon Kaplan","doi":"10.1055/s-0032-1328141","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study design: </strong> Systematic review.</p><p><strong>Study rationale: </strong> Disc degeneration is a common process starting early in life. Often disc herniation is an early step in disc degeneration, which may cause pain or stenosis. How quickly this subsequent disc degeneration occurs following a disc herniation and subsequent surgical treatment and whether certain spinal procedures increase the rate of degeneration remain unclear.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong> To investigate the risk of subsequent radiographic disc degeneration following discectomy, discography, and conservative care in patients with a first-time diagnosed herniated nucleus pulpous (HNP) and to ascertain whether this risk in these defined groups changes over time.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong> A systematic review of pertinent articles published up to June 2012. Key articles were searched to identify studies evaluating the risk of subsequent radiographic disc degeneration following treatment for HNP. Studies that included patients undergoing secondary surgery for disc herniation or that did not use a validated classification system to measure the severity of disc degeneration were excluded. Two independent reviewers assessed the strength of evidence using the GRADE criteria and disagreements were resolved by consensus.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> From a total of 147 possible citations, three cohort studies (class of evidence III) met our inclusion criteria and form the basis for this report. The risk of subsequent lumbar disc degeneration following standard discectomy was significantly greater compared with both microdiscectomy (48.7% vs 9.1%) and asymptomatic controls (90% vs 68%) in two studies with mean follow-ups of 5.5 and 25.3 years, respectively. Following conservative care for first-time HNP in the third study, the risk of progression of lumbar disc degeneration was 47.6% over the first 2 years of follow-up and 95.2% over the next 6 years of follow-up. In the same study, the risk of lumbar disc degeneration was shown to increase incrementally over the course of the 8-year follow-up, with all patients showing signs of degeneration at final examination.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong> Standard discectomy in first-time lumbar HNP may increase the risk of subsequent same-level lumbar disc degeneration compared with microdiscectomy as seen in one low-quality study. However, disc degeneration is likely a natural, temporal consequence following HNP, as demonstrated in a second low-quality study. The overall strength of evidence for the conclusions is very low.</p>","PeriodicalId":89675,"journal":{"name":"Evidence-based spine-care journal","volume":"3 4","pages":"33-40"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1055/s-0032-1328141","citationCount":"23","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evidence-based spine-care journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0032-1328141","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 23

Abstract

Study design:  Systematic review.

Study rationale:  Disc degeneration is a common process starting early in life. Often disc herniation is an early step in disc degeneration, which may cause pain or stenosis. How quickly this subsequent disc degeneration occurs following a disc herniation and subsequent surgical treatment and whether certain spinal procedures increase the rate of degeneration remain unclear.

Objectives:  To investigate the risk of subsequent radiographic disc degeneration following discectomy, discography, and conservative care in patients with a first-time diagnosed herniated nucleus pulpous (HNP) and to ascertain whether this risk in these defined groups changes over time.

Methods:  A systematic review of pertinent articles published up to June 2012. Key articles were searched to identify studies evaluating the risk of subsequent radiographic disc degeneration following treatment for HNP. Studies that included patients undergoing secondary surgery for disc herniation or that did not use a validated classification system to measure the severity of disc degeneration were excluded. Two independent reviewers assessed the strength of evidence using the GRADE criteria and disagreements were resolved by consensus.

Results:  From a total of 147 possible citations, three cohort studies (class of evidence III) met our inclusion criteria and form the basis for this report. The risk of subsequent lumbar disc degeneration following standard discectomy was significantly greater compared with both microdiscectomy (48.7% vs 9.1%) and asymptomatic controls (90% vs 68%) in two studies with mean follow-ups of 5.5 and 25.3 years, respectively. Following conservative care for first-time HNP in the third study, the risk of progression of lumbar disc degeneration was 47.6% over the first 2 years of follow-up and 95.2% over the next 6 years of follow-up. In the same study, the risk of lumbar disc degeneration was shown to increase incrementally over the course of the 8-year follow-up, with all patients showing signs of degeneration at final examination.

Conclusion:  Standard discectomy in first-time lumbar HNP may increase the risk of subsequent same-level lumbar disc degeneration compared with microdiscectomy as seen in one low-quality study. However, disc degeneration is likely a natural, temporal consequence following HNP, as demonstrated in a second low-quality study. The overall strength of evidence for the conclusions is very low.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

椎间盘突出后的椎间盘退变:我们是否加速了这个过程?
研究设计:系统评价。研究理由:椎间盘退变是一种常见的过程,开始于生命早期。椎间盘突出通常是椎间盘退变的早期阶段,可能引起疼痛或狭窄。椎间盘突出和随后的手术治疗后椎间盘退变发生的速度有多快,以及某些脊柱手术是否会增加退变率尚不清楚。目的:探讨首次诊断为髓核突出(HNP)的患者在椎间盘切除术、椎间盘造影和保守治疗后,放射学椎间盘退变的风险,并确定这些定义组的风险是否随时间变化。方法:系统回顾截至2012年6月发表的相关文章。检索关键文章以确定评估HNP治疗后继发影像学椎间盘退变风险的研究。排除了接受椎间盘突出二次手术的患者或未使用有效分类系统来测量椎间盘退变严重程度的研究。两名独立审稿人使用GRADE标准评估证据的强度,分歧通过共识解决。结果:从总共147篇可能的引用中,有3篇队列研究(III级证据)符合我们的纳入标准,构成了本报告的基础。在两项平均随访时间分别为5.5年和25.3年的研究中,标准椎间盘切除术后腰椎间盘退变的风险明显高于微椎间盘切除术(48.7% vs 9.1%)和无症状对照组(90% vs 68%)。在第三项研究中,对首次HNP进行保守治疗后,前2年随访期间腰椎间盘退变进展的风险为47.6%,后6年随访期间为95.2%。在同一项研究中,在8年的随访过程中,腰椎间盘退变的风险逐渐增加,所有患者在最终检查时都表现出退变的迹象。结论:在一项低质量的研究中发现,与显微椎间盘切除术相比,首次腰椎HNP的标准椎间盘切除术可能增加随后同一级别腰椎间盘退变的风险。然而,椎间盘退变可能是HNP后自然的、暂时的后果,正如第二项低质量研究所证明的那样。这些结论的总体证据强度非常低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信