Do high frequency ultrasound images support clinical skin assessment?

ISRN nursing Pub Date : 2013-01-01 Epub Date: 2013-02-21 DOI:10.1155/2013/314248
Alison P Porter-Armstrong, Catherine Adams, Anne S Moorhead, Jeannie Donnelly, Jane Nixon, Daniel L Bader, Courtney Lyder, May D Stinson
{"title":"Do high frequency ultrasound images support clinical skin assessment?","authors":"Alison P Porter-Armstrong,&nbsp;Catherine Adams,&nbsp;Anne S Moorhead,&nbsp;Jeannie Donnelly,&nbsp;Jane Nixon,&nbsp;Daniel L Bader,&nbsp;Courtney Lyder,&nbsp;May D Stinson","doi":"10.1155/2013/314248","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>High frequency ultrasound imaging has been reported as a potential method of identifying the suspected tissue damage in patients \"at risk\" of pressure ulceration. The aim of this study was to explore whether ultrasound images supported the clinical skin assessment in an inpatient population through identification of subcutaneous tissue damage. Skin on the heels and/or sacral coccygeal area of fifty vascular surgery inpatients was assessed clinically by tissue viability nurses and with ultrasound pre operatively and at least every other day until discharge. Images were compared to routine clinical skin assessment outcomes. Qualitative classification of ultrasound images did not match outcomes yielded through the clinical skin assessment. Images corresponding to 16 participants were classified as subgroup 3 damage at the heels (equivalent to grade 2 pressure ulceration); clinical skin assessment rated no heels as greater than grade 1a (blanching erythema). Conversely, all images captured of the sacral coccygeal area were classified as normal; the clinical skin assessment rated two participants as grade 1b (non-blanching erythema). Ultrasound imaging is a potentially useful adjunct to the clinical skin assessment in providing information about the underlying tissue. However, further longitudinal clinical assessment is required to characterise images against actual and \"staged\" pressure ulceration.</p>","PeriodicalId":89398,"journal":{"name":"ISRN nursing","volume":"2013 ","pages":"314248"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2013/314248","citationCount":"16","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ISRN nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/314248","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2013/2/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16

Abstract

High frequency ultrasound imaging has been reported as a potential method of identifying the suspected tissue damage in patients "at risk" of pressure ulceration. The aim of this study was to explore whether ultrasound images supported the clinical skin assessment in an inpatient population through identification of subcutaneous tissue damage. Skin on the heels and/or sacral coccygeal area of fifty vascular surgery inpatients was assessed clinically by tissue viability nurses and with ultrasound pre operatively and at least every other day until discharge. Images were compared to routine clinical skin assessment outcomes. Qualitative classification of ultrasound images did not match outcomes yielded through the clinical skin assessment. Images corresponding to 16 participants were classified as subgroup 3 damage at the heels (equivalent to grade 2 pressure ulceration); clinical skin assessment rated no heels as greater than grade 1a (blanching erythema). Conversely, all images captured of the sacral coccygeal area were classified as normal; the clinical skin assessment rated two participants as grade 1b (non-blanching erythema). Ultrasound imaging is a potentially useful adjunct to the clinical skin assessment in providing information about the underlying tissue. However, further longitudinal clinical assessment is required to characterise images against actual and "staged" pressure ulceration.

Abstract Image

高频超声图像是否支持临床皮肤评估?
据报道,高频超声成像是一种潜在的方法,可以识别“有风险”的压疮患者的可疑组织损伤。本研究的目的是探讨超声图像是否通过识别皮下组织损伤来支持住院患者的临床皮肤评估。对50例血管外科住院患者的足跟和(或)骶骨尾骨区皮肤进行术前和至少每隔一天超声检查。将图像与常规临床皮肤评估结果进行比较。超声图像的定性分类与临床皮肤评估结果不匹配。16名参与者对应的图像被分类为3亚组,脚跟损伤(相当于2级压性溃疡);临床皮肤评估认为无鞋跟大于1a级(漂白红斑)。相反,所有捕获的骶骨尾骨区域的图像都被归类为正常;临床皮肤评估将两名参与者评为1b级(非漂白性红斑)。超声成像是一种潜在的有用的辅助临床皮肤评估,提供有关底层组织的信息。然而,需要进一步的纵向临床评估来描述实际和“分期”压疮的图像特征。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书