Everolimus in metastatic renal cell carcinoma after failure of initial vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (VEGFr-TKI) therapy: results of an interim analysis of a non-interventional study.
Lothar Bergmann, Peter J Goebell, Ulrich Kube, Manfred Kindler, Edwin Herrmann, Jan Janssen, Joerg Schmitz, Steffen Weikert, Gabriel Steiner, Andreas Jakob, Michael D Staehler, Thomas Steiner, Friedrich Overkamp, Michael Albrecht, Gernot Guderian, Christian Doehn
{"title":"Everolimus in metastatic renal cell carcinoma after failure of initial vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (VEGFr-TKI) therapy: results of an interim analysis of a non-interventional study.","authors":"Lothar Bergmann, Peter J Goebell, Ulrich Kube, Manfred Kindler, Edwin Herrmann, Jan Janssen, Joerg Schmitz, Steffen Weikert, Gabriel Steiner, Andreas Jakob, Michael D Staehler, Thomas Steiner, Friedrich Overkamp, Michael Albrecht, Gernot Guderian, Christian Doehn","doi":"10.1159/000348522","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Everolimus is approved for treatment of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-refractory patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). Clinical trials rarely mirror treatment reality. Thus, a broader evaluation of everolimus is valuable for routine use.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>A German multicenter non-interventional study documented mRCC patients starting everolimus after failure of initial VEGF-targeted therapy. Primary endpoint was effectiveness, defined as time to progression (TTP) according to investigator assessment (time from first dose to progression).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 382 documented patients, 196 were included in this interim analysis. In the efficacy population (n = 165), median TTP was 7.0 months (95% confidence interval (CI) 5.1-9.0). Among patients with < or ≥ 6 months of previous VEGF-targeted therapy, median TTP was 6.6 months (95% CI 3.8-not estimable) and 7.4 months (95% CI 4.6-9.6), respectively. Most common adverse events were anemia (13%) and dyspnea (14%). Physicians assessed high tolerance and documented high adherence to everolimus therapy (approximately 97%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In routine clinical practice, everolimus is effective, as measured by median TTP (longer than median progression-free survival in RECORD-1 trial), and well tolerated. Our results support everolimus use in anti-VEGF-refractory patients with mRCC.</p>","PeriodicalId":19684,"journal":{"name":"Onkologie","volume":"36 3","pages":"95-100"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2013-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1159/000348522","citationCount":"16","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Onkologie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000348522","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2013/2/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16
Abstract
Background: Everolimus is approved for treatment of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-refractory patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). Clinical trials rarely mirror treatment reality. Thus, a broader evaluation of everolimus is valuable for routine use.
Patients and methods: A German multicenter non-interventional study documented mRCC patients starting everolimus after failure of initial VEGF-targeted therapy. Primary endpoint was effectiveness, defined as time to progression (TTP) according to investigator assessment (time from first dose to progression).
Results: Of 382 documented patients, 196 were included in this interim analysis. In the efficacy population (n = 165), median TTP was 7.0 months (95% confidence interval (CI) 5.1-9.0). Among patients with < or ≥ 6 months of previous VEGF-targeted therapy, median TTP was 6.6 months (95% CI 3.8-not estimable) and 7.4 months (95% CI 4.6-9.6), respectively. Most common adverse events were anemia (13%) and dyspnea (14%). Physicians assessed high tolerance and documented high adherence to everolimus therapy (approximately 97%).
Conclusion: In routine clinical practice, everolimus is effective, as measured by median TTP (longer than median progression-free survival in RECORD-1 trial), and well tolerated. Our results support everolimus use in anti-VEGF-refractory patients with mRCC.
背景:依维莫司被批准用于治疗抗血管内皮生长因子(VEGF)难治性转移性肾细胞癌(mRCC)患者。临床试验很少反映治疗的实际情况。因此,更广泛的评价依维莫司是有价值的常规使用。患者和方法:一项德国多中心非介入性研究记录了mRCC患者在初始vegf靶向治疗失败后开始使用依维莫司。主要终点是疗效,定义为根据研究者评估的进展时间(从首次给药到进展的时间)。结果:在382例记录在案的患者中,有196例纳入了中期分析。在有效人群(n = 165)中,中位TTP为7.0个月(95%可信区间(CI) 5.1-9.0)。在既往接受vegf靶向治疗<或≥6个月的患者中,中位TTP分别为6.6个月(95% CI 3.8-不可估计)和7.4个月(95% CI 4.6-9.6)。最常见的不良事件是贫血(13%)和呼吸困难(14%)。医生评估了依维莫司治疗的高耐受性和高依从性(约97%)。结论:在常规临床实践中,依维莫司是有效的,以中位TTP(在RECORD-1试验中比中位无进展生存期更长)来衡量,并且耐受性良好。我们的结果支持依维莫司用于抗vegf难治性mRCC患者。