Enhancement of ovarian malignancy on clinical contrast enhanced MRI studies.

ISRN obstetrics and gynecology Pub Date : 2013-01-01 Epub Date: 2013-02-13 DOI:10.1155/2013/979345
Harpreet K Pannu, Weining Ma, Emily Craig Zabor, Chaya S Moskowitz, Richard R Barakat, Hedvig Hricak
{"title":"Enhancement of ovarian malignancy on clinical contrast enhanced MRI studies.","authors":"Harpreet K Pannu,&nbsp;Weining Ma,&nbsp;Emily Craig Zabor,&nbsp;Chaya S Moskowitz,&nbsp;Richard R Barakat,&nbsp;Hedvig Hricak","doi":"10.1155/2013/979345","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Purpose. To assess if there is a significant difference in enhancement of high grade serous carcinoma of the ovary compared with other ovarian malignancies on clinically performed contrast enhanced MRI studies. Methods. In this institutional-review-board-approved study, two radiologists reviewed contrast enhanced MRI scans in 37 patients with ovarian cancer. Readers measured the signal intensity (SI) of ovarian mass and gluteal fat pre- and postcontrast administration. Percentage enhancement (PE) was calculated as [(post-pre)/precontrast SI] × 100. Results. Pathology revealed 19 patients with unilateral and 18 patients with bilateral malignancies for a total of 55 malignant ovaries-high grade serous carcinoma in 25/55 ovaries (45%), other epithelial carcinomas in 12 ovaries (22%), nonepithelial cancers in 8 ovaries (14%), and borderline tumors in 10 ovaries (18%). Enhancement of high grade serous carcinoma was not significantly different from other invasive ovarian malignancies (Reader 1 P = 0.865; Reader 2 P = 0.353). Enhancement of invasive ovarian malignancies was more than borderline tumors but did not reach statistical significance (Reader 1P = 0.102; Reader 2 P = 0.072). Conclusion. On clinically performed contrast enhanced MRI studies, enhancement of high grade serous ovarian carcinoma is not significantly different from other ovarian malignancies.</p>","PeriodicalId":73520,"journal":{"name":"ISRN obstetrics and gynecology","volume":"2013 ","pages":"979345"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2013/979345","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ISRN obstetrics and gynecology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/979345","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2013/2/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Purpose. To assess if there is a significant difference in enhancement of high grade serous carcinoma of the ovary compared with other ovarian malignancies on clinically performed contrast enhanced MRI studies. Methods. In this institutional-review-board-approved study, two radiologists reviewed contrast enhanced MRI scans in 37 patients with ovarian cancer. Readers measured the signal intensity (SI) of ovarian mass and gluteal fat pre- and postcontrast administration. Percentage enhancement (PE) was calculated as [(post-pre)/precontrast SI] × 100. Results. Pathology revealed 19 patients with unilateral and 18 patients with bilateral malignancies for a total of 55 malignant ovaries-high grade serous carcinoma in 25/55 ovaries (45%), other epithelial carcinomas in 12 ovaries (22%), nonepithelial cancers in 8 ovaries (14%), and borderline tumors in 10 ovaries (18%). Enhancement of high grade serous carcinoma was not significantly different from other invasive ovarian malignancies (Reader 1 P = 0.865; Reader 2 P = 0.353). Enhancement of invasive ovarian malignancies was more than borderline tumors but did not reach statistical significance (Reader 1P = 0.102; Reader 2 P = 0.072). Conclusion. On clinically performed contrast enhanced MRI studies, enhancement of high grade serous ovarian carcinoma is not significantly different from other ovarian malignancies.

卵巢恶性肿瘤的临床增强MRI检查。
目的。目的:评估高级别卵巢浆液性癌与其他卵巢恶性肿瘤在临床MRI增强检查中的增强效果是否有显著差异。方法。在这项机构审查委员会批准的研究中,两名放射科医生对37名卵巢癌患者进行了对比增强MRI扫描。阅读者测量对比前后卵巢肿块和臀脂肪的信号强度(SI)。百分比增强(PE)计算为[(pre - post)/pre - contrast SI] × 100。结果。病理显示单侧恶性肿瘤19例,双侧恶性肿瘤18例,共55个卵巢,其中25/55卵巢高级别浆液性癌(45%),其他上皮性癌12例(22%),非上皮性癌8例(14%),交界性肿瘤10例(18%)。高级别浆液性癌的增强与其他浸润性卵巢恶性肿瘤无显著差异(P = 0.865;P = 0.353)。浸润性卵巢恶性肿瘤的增强高于交界性卵巢恶性肿瘤,但差异无统计学意义(p = 0.102;P = 0.072)。结论。在临床进行的对比增强MRI研究中,高级别浆液性卵巢癌的增强与其他卵巢恶性肿瘤没有显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信