A comparison of item response theory-based methods for examining differential item functioning in object naming test by language of assessment among older Latinos.

Frances M Yang, Kevin C Heslin, Kala M Mehta, Cheng-Wu Yang, Katja Ocepek-Welikson, Marjorie Kleinman, Leo S Morales, Ron D Hays, Anita L Stewart, Dan Mungas, Richard N Jones, Jeanne A Teresi
{"title":"A comparison of item response theory-based methods for examining differential item functioning in object naming test by language of assessment among older Latinos.","authors":"Frances M Yang, Kevin C Heslin, Kala M Mehta, Cheng-Wu Yang, Katja Ocepek-Welikson, Marjorie Kleinman, Leo S Morales, Ron D Hays, Anita L Stewart, Dan Mungas, Richard N Jones, Jeanne A Teresi","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Object naming tests are commonly included in neuropsychological test batteries. <i>Differential item functioning</i> (DIF) in these tests due to cultural and language differences may compromise the validity of cognitive measures in diverse populations. We evaluated 26 object naming items for DIF due to Spanish and English language translations among Latinos (<i>n</i>=1,159), mean age of 70.5 years old (Standard Deviation (<i>SD</i>)±7.2), using the following four <i>item response theory</i>-based approaches: <i>Mplus/Multiple Indicator, Multiple Causes</i> (Mplus/MIMIC; Muthén & Muthén, 1998-2011), <i>Item Response Theory Likelihood Ratio Differential Item Functioning</i> (IRTLRDIF/MULTILOG; Thissen, 1991, 2001), difwithpar/Parscale (Crane, Gibbons, Jolley, & van Belle, 2006; Muraki & Bock, 2003), and Differential Functioning of Items and Tests/MULTILOG (DFIT/MULTILOG; Flowers, Oshima, & Raju, 1999; Thissen, 1991). Overall, there was moderate to near perfect agreement across methods. Fourteen items were found to exhibit DIF and 5 items observed consistently across all methods, which were more likely to be answered correctly by individuals tested in Spanish after controlling for overall ability.</p>","PeriodicalId":89843,"journal":{"name":"Psychological test and assessment modeling","volume":"53 4","pages":"440-460"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3588164/pdf/nihms351228.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychological test and assessment modeling","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Object naming tests are commonly included in neuropsychological test batteries. Differential item functioning (DIF) in these tests due to cultural and language differences may compromise the validity of cognitive measures in diverse populations. We evaluated 26 object naming items for DIF due to Spanish and English language translations among Latinos (n=1,159), mean age of 70.5 years old (Standard Deviation (SD)±7.2), using the following four item response theory-based approaches: Mplus/Multiple Indicator, Multiple Causes (Mplus/MIMIC; Muthén & Muthén, 1998-2011), Item Response Theory Likelihood Ratio Differential Item Functioning (IRTLRDIF/MULTILOG; Thissen, 1991, 2001), difwithpar/Parscale (Crane, Gibbons, Jolley, & van Belle, 2006; Muraki & Bock, 2003), and Differential Functioning of Items and Tests/MULTILOG (DFIT/MULTILOG; Flowers, Oshima, & Raju, 1999; Thissen, 1991). Overall, there was moderate to near perfect agreement across methods. Fourteen items were found to exhibit DIF and 5 items observed consistently across all methods, which were more likely to be answered correctly by individuals tested in Spanish after controlling for overall ability.

基于项目反应理论的老年拉美裔对象命名测试中项目功能差异评估方法的比较。
物体命名测试通常包括在神经心理学测试组中。由于文化和语言差异,这些测试中的差异项目功能(DIF)可能会损害认知测量在不同人群中的有效性。我们评估了26个因西班牙语和英语翻译导致的DIF的对象命名项目(n= 1159),平均年龄70.5岁(标准差(SD)±7.2),采用以下四种基于项目反应理论的方法:Mplus/多指标,多原因(Mplus/MIMIC;项目反应理论似然比差分项目功能(IRTLRDIF/MULTILOG);蒂森,1991年,2001年),difwithpar/Parscale (Crane, Gibbons, Jolley, & van Belle, 2006年;Muraki & Bock, 2003),以及项目和测试/MULTILOG的微分功能(DFIT/MULTILOG;花,大岛和拉州,1999;Thissen, 1991)。总体而言,各种方法之间存在中度至近乎完美的一致性。发现14个项目表现出DIF, 5个项目在所有方法中观察到一致,在控制整体能力后,用西班牙语测试的个体更有可能正确回答。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书