Impact of starting point and C2 nerve status on the safety and accuracy of C1 lateral mass screws: meta-analysis and review of the literature.

Q Medicine
Robert E Elliott, Omar Tanweer, Anthony Frempong-Boadu, Michael L Smith
{"title":"Impact of starting point and C2 nerve status on the safety and accuracy of C1 lateral mass screws: meta-analysis and review of the literature.","authors":"Robert E Elliott,&nbsp;Omar Tanweer,&nbsp;Anthony Frempong-Boadu,&nbsp;Michael L Smith","doi":"10.1097/BSD.0b013e3182898aa9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>Literature review and meta-analysis.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare clinical and radiographic outcomes of patients treated with C1 lateral mass screws (C1LMS), analyzing the impact of screw starting point and C2 nerve sectioning on malposition, vertebral artery injury (VAI), and C2 neuralgia and numbness.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>Various starting points have been suggested for C1LMS insertion. Some advocate sectioning the C2 nerve root to ease placement.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Online databases were searched for English language articles between 1994 and 2012 reporting on C1LMS. Forty-two studies describing 1471 patients instrumented with 2905 C1LMS met inclusion criteria. Three surgical techniques included posterior arch starting point and center of lateral mass with nerve root preservation or sacrifice.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All studies provided class III evidence. Three injuries to the vertebral artery occurred secondary to C1LMS insertion (0.1%) and 5 instances of clinically significant screw malpositions (0.2%). Postoperative imaging revealed 45 malpositioned screws (1.6%) without clinical consequences. Meta-analysis techniques demonstrated that sacrifice of the C2 nerve root caused greater postoperative numbness but less neuralgia and fewer screw malpositions. Similar rates of screw malposition and VAI arose with posterior arch screws and those starting below the arch with C2 nerve preservation, but the latter had greater numbness and pain.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A thorough understanding of atlantoaxial anatomy and modern surgical techniques renders the insertion of C1LMS safe and accurate. The incidence of clinically significant malpositioned screws or VAI is <0.5%. Sacrifice of the C2 nerve root did result in fewer malpositioned screws. Numbness occurred in 11% of patients, an outcome that may be unacceptable to certain patient populations, but neuropathic pain was nearly absent with nerve sectioning. C2 nerve preservation and retraction for C1 screw placement may have higher incidence of neuropathic pain. Posterior arch screws are a viable option for patients with arches that are of adequate height.</p>","PeriodicalId":50043,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Spinal Disorders & Techniques","volume":"28 5","pages":"171-85"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1097/BSD.0b013e3182898aa9","citationCount":"15","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Spinal Disorders & Techniques","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/BSD.0b013e3182898aa9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

Abstract

Study design: Literature review and meta-analysis.

Objective: To compare clinical and radiographic outcomes of patients treated with C1 lateral mass screws (C1LMS), analyzing the impact of screw starting point and C2 nerve sectioning on malposition, vertebral artery injury (VAI), and C2 neuralgia and numbness.

Background: Various starting points have been suggested for C1LMS insertion. Some advocate sectioning the C2 nerve root to ease placement.

Methods: Online databases were searched for English language articles between 1994 and 2012 reporting on C1LMS. Forty-two studies describing 1471 patients instrumented with 2905 C1LMS met inclusion criteria. Three surgical techniques included posterior arch starting point and center of lateral mass with nerve root preservation or sacrifice.

Results: All studies provided class III evidence. Three injuries to the vertebral artery occurred secondary to C1LMS insertion (0.1%) and 5 instances of clinically significant screw malpositions (0.2%). Postoperative imaging revealed 45 malpositioned screws (1.6%) without clinical consequences. Meta-analysis techniques demonstrated that sacrifice of the C2 nerve root caused greater postoperative numbness but less neuralgia and fewer screw malpositions. Similar rates of screw malposition and VAI arose with posterior arch screws and those starting below the arch with C2 nerve preservation, but the latter had greater numbness and pain.

Conclusion: A thorough understanding of atlantoaxial anatomy and modern surgical techniques renders the insertion of C1LMS safe and accurate. The incidence of clinically significant malpositioned screws or VAI is <0.5%. Sacrifice of the C2 nerve root did result in fewer malpositioned screws. Numbness occurred in 11% of patients, an outcome that may be unacceptable to certain patient populations, but neuropathic pain was nearly absent with nerve sectioning. C2 nerve preservation and retraction for C1 screw placement may have higher incidence of neuropathic pain. Posterior arch screws are a viable option for patients with arches that are of adequate height.

起始点和C2神经状态对C1侧块螺钉安全性和准确性的影响:meta分析和文献回顾。
研究设计:文献回顾和荟萃分析。目的:比较C1侧块螺钉(C1 lateral mass螺钉,C1LMS)患者的临床和影像学结果,分析螺钉起始点和C2神经切分对错位、椎动脉损伤(VAI)、C2神经痛和麻木的影响。背景:对于C1LMS的插入有不同的起始点。有些人主张切开C2神经根以方便放置。方法:检索在线数据库中1994 ~ 2012年有关C1LMS的英文文献。42项研究描述了1471例使用2905 C1LMS的患者符合纳入标准。三种手术方法包括后弓起始点和外侧肿块中心,保留或牺牲神经根。结果:所有研究均提供III级证据。3例椎动脉损伤继发于C1LMS插入(0.1%),5例临床显著螺钉错位(0.2%)。术后影像学显示45例螺钉错位(1.6%),无临床后果。荟萃分析技术表明,C2神经根的牺牲引起更大的术后麻木,但更少的神经痛和更少的螺钉错位。后弓螺钉和保留C2神经的弓以下螺钉的螺钉错位和VAI发生率相似,但后者有更大的麻木和疼痛。结论:充分了解寰枢解剖和现代外科技术,可以安全、准确地插入C1LMS。临床上显著的螺钉错位或VAI的发生率为
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.16
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Spinal Disorders & Techniques features peer-reviewed original articles on diagnosis, management, and surgery for spinal problems. Topics include degenerative disorders, spinal trauma, diagnostic anesthetic blocks, metastatic tumor spinal replacements, management of pain syndromes, and the use of imaging techniques in evaluating lumbar spine disorder. The journal also presents thoroughly documented case reports.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信