Temporomandibular disorder pain after whiplash trauma: a systematic review.

Birgitta Häggman-Henrikson, Thomas List, Hans T Westergren, Susanna H Axelsson
{"title":"Temporomandibular disorder pain after whiplash trauma: a systematic review.","authors":"Birgitta Häggman-Henrikson,&nbsp;Thomas List,&nbsp;Hans T Westergren,&nbsp;Susanna H Axelsson","doi":"10.11607/jop.1027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>To assess, by systematic review of the literature, (1) the prevalence and incidence of temporomandibular disorder (TMD) pain after whiplash trauma, and (2) whether treatment modalities commonly used for TMD are equally effective in patients with solely TMD pain and those with TMD/whiplash-associated disorders (WAD) pain.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic literature search of the PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Bandolier databases was conducted from January 1966 through October 2012. The systematic search identified 125 articles. After an initial screening of abstracts, 45 articles were reviewed in full text. Two investigators evaluated the methodological quality of each identified study.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eight studies on prevalence/incidence of TMD pain in WAD and four studies on interventions in TMD pain and WAD met the inclusion criteria. The reported median prevalence of TMD pain after whiplash trauma was 23% (range 2.4% to 52%) and the incidence ranged from 4% to 34%. For healthy controls, the reported median prevalence was 3% (range 2.5% to 8%) and the incidence ranged from 4.7% to 7%. For patients with a combination of TMD pain and WAD, treatment modalities conventionally used for TMD, such as jaw exercises and occlusal splints, had less of an effect (median improvement rate of 48%, range 13% to 68%) compared to TMD patients without a whiplash injury (75%, range 51% to 91%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There is some evidence that prevalence and incidence of TMD pain is increased after whiplash trauma. The poorer treatment outcome suggests that TMD pain after whiplash trauma has a different pathophysiology compared to TMD pain localized to the facial region.</p>","PeriodicalId":16649,"journal":{"name":"Journal of orofacial pain","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.11607/jop.1027","citationCount":"41","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of orofacial pain","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11607/jop.1027","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 41

Abstract

Aims: To assess, by systematic review of the literature, (1) the prevalence and incidence of temporomandibular disorder (TMD) pain after whiplash trauma, and (2) whether treatment modalities commonly used for TMD are equally effective in patients with solely TMD pain and those with TMD/whiplash-associated disorders (WAD) pain.

Methods: A systematic literature search of the PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Bandolier databases was conducted from January 1966 through October 2012. The systematic search identified 125 articles. After an initial screening of abstracts, 45 articles were reviewed in full text. Two investigators evaluated the methodological quality of each identified study.

Results: Eight studies on prevalence/incidence of TMD pain in WAD and four studies on interventions in TMD pain and WAD met the inclusion criteria. The reported median prevalence of TMD pain after whiplash trauma was 23% (range 2.4% to 52%) and the incidence ranged from 4% to 34%. For healthy controls, the reported median prevalence was 3% (range 2.5% to 8%) and the incidence ranged from 4.7% to 7%. For patients with a combination of TMD pain and WAD, treatment modalities conventionally used for TMD, such as jaw exercises and occlusal splints, had less of an effect (median improvement rate of 48%, range 13% to 68%) compared to TMD patients without a whiplash injury (75%, range 51% to 91%).

Conclusion: There is some evidence that prevalence and incidence of TMD pain is increased after whiplash trauma. The poorer treatment outcome suggests that TMD pain after whiplash trauma has a different pathophysiology compared to TMD pain localized to the facial region.

鞭伤后颞下颌紊乱疼痛:系统回顾。
目的:通过对文献的系统回顾,评估(1)鞭扭伤后颞下颌紊乱(TMD)疼痛的患病率和发生率,以及(2)常用的TMD治疗方式对单纯TMD疼痛患者和TMD/鞭扭伤相关疾病(WAD)疼痛患者是否同样有效。方法:从1966年1月至2012年10月对PubMed、Cochrane Library和Bandolier数据库进行系统文献检索。系统检索确定了125篇文章。在对摘要进行初步筛选后,对45篇文章进行了全文审查。两名研究者评估了每项研究的方法学质量。结果:8项关于TMD疼痛在WAD中的患病率/发病率的研究和4项关于TMD疼痛和WAD干预措施的研究符合纳入标准。据报道,颈部扭伤后TMD疼痛的中位患病率为23%(范围为2.4%至52%),发病率为4%至34%。对于健康对照,报告的中位患病率为3%(范围为2.5%至8%),发病率为4.7%至7%。对于合并TMD疼痛和WAD的患者,常规用于TMD的治疗方式,如颌部运动和咬合夹板,与没有颈部扭伤的TMD患者(75%,51%至91%)相比,效果较小(中位改良率为48%,范围为13%至68%)。结论:有证据表明,颈部扭伤后TMD疼痛的患病率和发生率增加。较差的治疗结果表明,与局限于面部区域的TMD疼痛相比,颈部扭伤后的TMD疼痛具有不同的病理生理学。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of orofacial pain
Journal of orofacial pain 医学-牙科与口腔外科
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信