Anatomical landmarks of maxillary bifurcated first premolars and their influence on periodontal diagnosis and treatment.

Reem Dababneh, Rania Rodan
{"title":"Anatomical landmarks of maxillary bifurcated first premolars and their influence on periodontal diagnosis and treatment.","authors":"Reem Dababneh,&nbsp;Rania Rodan","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the anatomical landmarks of the roots of bifurcated maxillary first premolars and study their effect on the diagnosis and management of periodontal disease.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>One hundred sixty-five maxillary first premolars were selected. The frequency of single-, two-rooted, and three-rooted premolars was assessed, but only the dual-rooted were used for the purpose of this study. For each tooth, the following measurements were obtained using a micrometer caliper: buccal and palatal root length, mesial and distal root trunk length, crown length, and width of the furcation entrance. The types of root trunk were classified according to the ratio of root trunk height to root length into types A, B and C. Root trunk types A, B and C are defined as root trunks involving the cervical third or less, up to half of the length of the root, or greater than the apical half of the root, respectively. The presence of any root grooves and concavities, as well as bifurational ridges, was assessed. The crown to root ratio was calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 165 maxillary first premolar teeth retrieved, 100 (60.6%) were two-rooted, 62 (37.57%) were single-rooted, and three (1.81%) were triple-rooted. Type A root trunks comprised only 7% of the examined teeth, while types B and C had more or less comparable results (46% and 47% respectively). Type B was more common in distal root trunks while type C was dominant in mesial root trunks. Bifurcation ridges were observed in 37% of the teeth; the mean root trunk length was greater in teeth with bifurcation ridges than in teeth without (7.41 mm vs. 5.96 mm). Root grooves and concavities were found in 96% of the mesial aspects of the root, and in 57% of the palatal aspect of the buccal root. The mean width of the furcation entrance was 0.89 +/- 0.19 mm (range 0.39-1.28). The average crown to root ratio was 0.69:1.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Awareness of root surface anatomical variations may help the practitioner when assessing the diagnosis, treatment plan and prognosis of periodontally involved two-rooted maxillary premolars.</p>","PeriodicalId":17281,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the International Academy of Periodontology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the International Academy of Periodontology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To assess the anatomical landmarks of the roots of bifurcated maxillary first premolars and study their effect on the diagnosis and management of periodontal disease.

Methods: One hundred sixty-five maxillary first premolars were selected. The frequency of single-, two-rooted, and three-rooted premolars was assessed, but only the dual-rooted were used for the purpose of this study. For each tooth, the following measurements were obtained using a micrometer caliper: buccal and palatal root length, mesial and distal root trunk length, crown length, and width of the furcation entrance. The types of root trunk were classified according to the ratio of root trunk height to root length into types A, B and C. Root trunk types A, B and C are defined as root trunks involving the cervical third or less, up to half of the length of the root, or greater than the apical half of the root, respectively. The presence of any root grooves and concavities, as well as bifurational ridges, was assessed. The crown to root ratio was calculated.

Results: Of the 165 maxillary first premolar teeth retrieved, 100 (60.6%) were two-rooted, 62 (37.57%) were single-rooted, and three (1.81%) were triple-rooted. Type A root trunks comprised only 7% of the examined teeth, while types B and C had more or less comparable results (46% and 47% respectively). Type B was more common in distal root trunks while type C was dominant in mesial root trunks. Bifurcation ridges were observed in 37% of the teeth; the mean root trunk length was greater in teeth with bifurcation ridges than in teeth without (7.41 mm vs. 5.96 mm). Root grooves and concavities were found in 96% of the mesial aspects of the root, and in 57% of the palatal aspect of the buccal root. The mean width of the furcation entrance was 0.89 +/- 0.19 mm (range 0.39-1.28). The average crown to root ratio was 0.69:1.

Conclusion: Awareness of root surface anatomical variations may help the practitioner when assessing the diagnosis, treatment plan and prognosis of periodontally involved two-rooted maxillary premolars.

上颌分岔第一前磨牙的解剖标志及其对牙周诊断和治疗的影响。
目的:探讨上颌第一前磨牙分叉根的解剖标志及其在牙周病诊断和治疗中的作用。方法:选取上颌第一前磨牙165颗。我们评估了单根、双根和三根前磨牙的使用频率,但本研究仅使用双根前磨牙。对于每颗牙齿,使用千分尺测量以下数据:颊根和腭根长度,中根和远根干长度,冠长度和分叉入口宽度。根据根高与根长之比,将根干类型分为A、B、C三类。根干类型A、B、C三类分别定义为涉及颈部三分之一及以下、达根长一半或大于根尖一半的根干。评估任何根沟和凹陷以及分岔脊的存在。计算冠根比。结果:165颗上颌第一前磨牙中,双根100颗(60.6%),单根62颗(37.57%),三根3颗(1.81%)。A型牙根干只占检查牙齿的7%,而B型和C型的结果或多或少相似(分别为46%和47%)。B型多见于远端根干,C型多见于近端根干。37%的牙齿出现分叉嵴;有分叉嵴的牙齿比没有分叉嵴的牙齿的平均根干长度大(7.41 mm比5.96 mm)。根槽和凹在96%的根的中侧面,在57%的颊根的腭侧面。分叉口平均宽度为0.89±0.19 mm(范围0.39 ~ 1.28)。冠根比平均为0.69:1。结论:了解牙根面解剖变异有助于临床医师评估牙周病变双根上颌前磨牙的诊断、治疗方案和预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信