The Social Attribution Task-Multiple Choice (SAT-MC): A Psychometric and Equivalence Study of an Alternate Form.

ISRN Psychiatry Pub Date : 2013-06-20 Print Date: 2013-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2013/830825
Jason K Johannesen, Jessica B Lurie, Joanna M Fiszdon, Morris D Bell
{"title":"The Social Attribution Task-Multiple Choice (SAT-MC): A Psychometric and Equivalence Study of an Alternate Form.","authors":"Jason K Johannesen,&nbsp;Jessica B Lurie,&nbsp;Joanna M Fiszdon,&nbsp;Morris D Bell","doi":"10.1155/2013/830825","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Social Attribution Task-Multiple Choice (SAT-MC) uses a 64-second video of geometric shapes set in motion to portray themes of social relatedness and intentions. Considered a test of \"Theory of Mind,\" the SAT-MC assesses implicit social attribution formation while reducing verbal and basic cognitive demands required of other common measures. We present a comparability analysis of the SAT-MC and the new SAT-MC-II, an alternate form created for repeat testing, in a university sample (n = 92). Score distributions and patterns of association with external validation measures were nearly identical between the two forms, with convergent and discriminant validity supported by association with affect recognition ability and lack of association with basic visual reasoning. Internal consistency of the SAT-MC-II was superior (alpha = .81) to the SAT-MC (alpha = .56). Results support the use of SAT-MC and new SAT-MC-II as equivalent test forms. Demonstrating relatively higher association to social cognitive than basic cognitive abilities, the SAT-MC may provide enhanced sensitivity as an outcome measure of social cognitive intervention trials. </p>","PeriodicalId":14749,"journal":{"name":"ISRN Psychiatry","volume":"2013 ","pages":"830825"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2013/830825","citationCount":"15","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ISRN Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/830825","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2013/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Print","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

Abstract

The Social Attribution Task-Multiple Choice (SAT-MC) uses a 64-second video of geometric shapes set in motion to portray themes of social relatedness and intentions. Considered a test of "Theory of Mind," the SAT-MC assesses implicit social attribution formation while reducing verbal and basic cognitive demands required of other common measures. We present a comparability analysis of the SAT-MC and the new SAT-MC-II, an alternate form created for repeat testing, in a university sample (n = 92). Score distributions and patterns of association with external validation measures were nearly identical between the two forms, with convergent and discriminant validity supported by association with affect recognition ability and lack of association with basic visual reasoning. Internal consistency of the SAT-MC-II was superior (alpha = .81) to the SAT-MC (alpha = .56). Results support the use of SAT-MC and new SAT-MC-II as equivalent test forms. Demonstrating relatively higher association to social cognitive than basic cognitive abilities, the SAT-MC may provide enhanced sensitivity as an outcome measure of social cognitive intervention trials.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

社会归因任务-选择题(SAT-MC):一种替代形式的心理测量学和等价性研究。
社会归因选择题(SAT-MC)使用一段64秒的几何图形视频来描绘社会关系和意图的主题。被认为是“心理理论”的测试,SAT-MC评估内隐社会归因形成,同时减少其他常见测试所需的言语和基本认知要求。我们在大学样本(n = 92)中对SAT-MC和新的SAT-MC- ii(为重复测试而创建的替代表格)进行了可比性分析。两种形式的得分分布和与外部验证措施的关联模式几乎相同,具有收敛效度和判别效度,与情感识别能力的关联支持,缺乏与基本视觉推理的关联。SAT-MC- ii的内部一致性(alpha = 0.81)优于SAT-MC (alpha = 0.56)。结果支持使用SAT-MC和新的SAT-MC- ii作为等效的测试形式。与基本认知能力相比,SAT-MC与社会认知能力的相关性相对较高,因此可以作为社会认知干预试验的结果测量指标,提供更高的敏感性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信