Individual saturated and monounsaturated fatty acids trigger distinct transcriptional networks in differentiated 3T3-L1 preadipocytes.

Q Agricultural and Biological Sciences
Journal of Nutrigenetics and Nutrigenomics Pub Date : 2013-01-01 Epub Date: 2013-02-06 DOI:10.1159/000345913
Brittany Shaw, Samuel Lambert, Monica H T Wong, Jessica C Ralston, Carolina Stryjecki, David M Mutch
{"title":"Individual saturated and monounsaturated fatty acids trigger distinct transcriptional networks in differentiated 3T3-L1 preadipocytes.","authors":"Brittany Shaw,&nbsp;Samuel Lambert,&nbsp;Monica H T Wong,&nbsp;Jessica C Ralston,&nbsp;Carolina Stryjecki,&nbsp;David M Mutch","doi":"10.1159/000345913","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/aims: </strong>Saturated fatty acids (SFA) are widely thought to induce inflammation in adipose tissue (AT), while monounsaturated fatty acids (MUFA) are purported to have the opposite effect; however, it is unclear if individual SFA and MUFA behave similarly. Our goal was to examine adipocyte transcriptional networks regulated by individual SFA (palmitic acid, PA; stearic acid, SA) and MUFA (palmitoleic acid, PMA; oleic acid, OA).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Differentiated preadipocytes were treated with either 250 µM PA, SA, PMA, or OA for 48 h. Gene expression was analyzed using microarrays and real-time RT-PCR. Data were compared with those of a previous study reporting AT gene expression in humans following the consumption of SFA- or MUFA-enriched diets.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Individual fatty acid treatments had significant effects on adipocyte gene expression. Functional analyses revealed that PA induced the TLR signalling pathway, while PMA had the opposite effect. SA and OA had similar effects, with increases in key metabolic pathways including mTOR and PPAR signalling and a reduction in TLR signalling. Ccl5 was validated as a candidate gene that may mediate the differential inflammatory effects of SFA and MUFA in AT.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Individual SFA and MUFA trigger distinct transcriptional responses in differentiated preadipocytes, with inflammatory and metabolic pathways particularly sensitive to these fatty acids.</p>","PeriodicalId":54779,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nutrigenetics and Nutrigenomics","volume":"6 1","pages":"1-15"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1159/000345913","citationCount":"48","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nutrigenetics and Nutrigenomics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000345913","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2013/2/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 48

Abstract

Background/aims: Saturated fatty acids (SFA) are widely thought to induce inflammation in adipose tissue (AT), while monounsaturated fatty acids (MUFA) are purported to have the opposite effect; however, it is unclear if individual SFA and MUFA behave similarly. Our goal was to examine adipocyte transcriptional networks regulated by individual SFA (palmitic acid, PA; stearic acid, SA) and MUFA (palmitoleic acid, PMA; oleic acid, OA).

Methods: Differentiated preadipocytes were treated with either 250 µM PA, SA, PMA, or OA for 48 h. Gene expression was analyzed using microarrays and real-time RT-PCR. Data were compared with those of a previous study reporting AT gene expression in humans following the consumption of SFA- or MUFA-enriched diets.

Results: Individual fatty acid treatments had significant effects on adipocyte gene expression. Functional analyses revealed that PA induced the TLR signalling pathway, while PMA had the opposite effect. SA and OA had similar effects, with increases in key metabolic pathways including mTOR and PPAR signalling and a reduction in TLR signalling. Ccl5 was validated as a candidate gene that may mediate the differential inflammatory effects of SFA and MUFA in AT.

Conclusions: Individual SFA and MUFA trigger distinct transcriptional responses in differentiated preadipocytes, with inflammatory and metabolic pathways particularly sensitive to these fatty acids.

单个饱和脂肪酸和单不饱和脂肪酸在分化的3T3-L1前脂肪细胞中触发不同的转录网络。
背景/目的:饱和脂肪酸(SFA)被广泛认为会诱发脂肪组织(AT)的炎症,而单不饱和脂肪酸(MUFA)则被认为具有相反的作用;然而,尚不清楚单个SFA和MUFA的行为是否相似。我们的目的是研究由单个SFA(棕榈酸,PA;硬脂酸(SA)和棕榈油酸(PMA);油酸,OA)。方法:分别用250µM PA、SA、PMA或OA处理分化的前脂肪细胞48 h,采用微阵列和实时RT-PCR分析基因表达。数据与先前的一项研究进行了比较,该研究报告了食用富含SFA或mufa的饮食后人类AT基因表达的情况。结果:不同脂肪酸处理对脂肪细胞基因表达有显著影响。功能分析显示,PA诱导TLR信号通路,而PMA则相反。SA和OA具有相似的作用,包括mTOR和PPAR信号在内的关键代谢途径增加,TLR信号减少。Ccl5被证实是一个候选基因,可能介导SFA和MUFA在AT中的不同炎症作用。结论:单个SFA和MUFA在分化的前脂肪细胞中触发不同的转录反应,炎症和代谢途径对这些脂肪酸特别敏感。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Nutrigenetics and Nutrigenomics
Journal of Nutrigenetics and Nutrigenomics GENETICS & HEREDITY-NUTRITION & DIETETICS
CiteScore
1.86
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The emerging field of nutrigenetics and nutrigenomics is rapidly gaining importance, and this new international journal has been established to meet the needs of the investigators for a high-quality platform for their research. Endorsed by the recently founded "International Society of Nutrigenetics/Nutrigenomics", the ‘Journal of Nutrigenetics and Nutrigenomics’ welcomes contributions not only investigating the role of genetic variation in response to diet and that of nutrients in the regulation of gene expression, but is also open for articles covering all aspects of gene-environment interactions in the determination of health and disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信