Sentinel lymph node biopsy in patients with thick primary cutaneous melanoma: patterns of use and underuse utilizing a population-based model.

ISRN Dermatology Pub Date : 2013-01-01 Epub Date: 2013-01-10 DOI:10.1155/2013/315609
Steve R Martinez, Dhruvil R Shah, Anthony D Yang, Robert J Canter, Emanual Maverakis
{"title":"Sentinel lymph node biopsy in patients with thick primary cutaneous melanoma: patterns of use and underuse utilizing a population-based model.","authors":"Steve R Martinez,&nbsp;Dhruvil R Shah,&nbsp;Anthony D Yang,&nbsp;Robert J Canter,&nbsp;Emanual Maverakis","doi":"10.1155/2013/315609","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Background. Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) for thick cutaneous melanoma is supported by national guidelines. We report on factors associated with the use and underuse of SLNB for thick primary cutaneous melanoma. Methods. The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database was queried for patients who underwent surgery for thick primary cutaneous melanoma from 2004 to 2008. We used multivariate logistic regression models to predict use of SLNB. Results. Among 1,981 patients, 833 (41.8%) did not undergo SLNB. Patients with primary melanomas of the arm (OR 2.07, CI 1.56-2.75; P < 0.001), leg (OR 2.40, CI 1.70-3.40; P < 0.001), and trunk (OR 1.82, CI 1.38-2.40; P < 0.001) had an increased likelihood of receiving a SLNB, as did those with desmoplastic histology (OR 1.47, CI 1.11-1.96; P = 0.008). A decreased likelihood of receiving SLNB was noted for advancing age ≥ 60 years (age 60 to 69: OR 0.58, CI 0.33-0.99, P = 0.047; age 70 to 79: OR 0.32, CI 0.19-0.54, P < 0.001; age 80 or more: OR 0.10, CI 0.06-0.16, P < 0.001) and unknown race/ethnicity (OR 0.21, CI 0.07-0.62; P = 0.005). Conclusions. In particular, elderly patients are less likely to receive SLNB. Further research is needed to assess whether use of SLNB in this population is detrimental or beneficial.</p>","PeriodicalId":14682,"journal":{"name":"ISRN Dermatology","volume":"2013 ","pages":"315609"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2013/315609","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ISRN Dermatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/315609","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2013/1/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Background. Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) for thick cutaneous melanoma is supported by national guidelines. We report on factors associated with the use and underuse of SLNB for thick primary cutaneous melanoma. Methods. The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database was queried for patients who underwent surgery for thick primary cutaneous melanoma from 2004 to 2008. We used multivariate logistic regression models to predict use of SLNB. Results. Among 1,981 patients, 833 (41.8%) did not undergo SLNB. Patients with primary melanomas of the arm (OR 2.07, CI 1.56-2.75; P < 0.001), leg (OR 2.40, CI 1.70-3.40; P < 0.001), and trunk (OR 1.82, CI 1.38-2.40; P < 0.001) had an increased likelihood of receiving a SLNB, as did those with desmoplastic histology (OR 1.47, CI 1.11-1.96; P = 0.008). A decreased likelihood of receiving SLNB was noted for advancing age ≥ 60 years (age 60 to 69: OR 0.58, CI 0.33-0.99, P = 0.047; age 70 to 79: OR 0.32, CI 0.19-0.54, P < 0.001; age 80 or more: OR 0.10, CI 0.06-0.16, P < 0.001) and unknown race/ethnicity (OR 0.21, CI 0.07-0.62; P = 0.005). Conclusions. In particular, elderly patients are less likely to receive SLNB. Further research is needed to assess whether use of SLNB in this population is detrimental or beneficial.

原发性厚皮肤黑色素瘤患者的前哨淋巴结活检:利用基于人群的模型的使用模式和未充分使用。
背景。前哨淋巴结活检(SLNB)厚皮肤黑色素瘤是支持国家指南。我们报道与SLNB治疗原发性厚皮肤黑色素瘤的使用和未充分使用相关的因素。方法。对2004年至2008年接受过原发性厚皮肤黑色素瘤手术的患者的监测、流行病学和最终结果数据库进行了查询。我们使用多元逻辑回归模型来预测SLNB的使用。结果。1981例患者中,833例(41.8%)未行SLNB。手臂原发性黑色素瘤患者(OR 2.07, CI 1.56-2.75;P < 0.001),组(OR 2.40, CI 1.70-3.40;P < 0.001),主干(OR 1.82, CI 1.38-2.40;P < 0.001)的患者接受SLNB的可能性增加,有结缔组织增生组织学的患者也是如此(OR 1.47, CI 1.11-1.96;P = 0.008)。年龄≥60岁的患者接受SLNB的可能性降低(60 - 69岁:OR 0.58, CI 0.33-0.99, P = 0.047;70 ~ 79岁:OR 0.32, CI 0.19 ~ 0.54, P < 0.001;80岁或以上:or 0.10, CI 0.06-0.16, P < 0.001)和未知种族/民族(or 0.21, CI 0.07-0.62;P = 0.005)。结论。特别是老年患者接受SLNB的可能性较小。需要进一步的研究来评估在这一人群中使用SLNB是有害还是有益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信