Speech-language pathology findings in patients with mouth breathing: multidisciplinary diagnosis according to etiology.

Patrícia Junqueira, Irene Queiroz Marchesan, Luciana Regina de Oliveira, Emílio Ciccone, Leonardo Haddad, Maria Cândida Rizzo
{"title":"Speech-language pathology findings in patients with mouth breathing: multidisciplinary diagnosis according to etiology.","authors":"Patrícia Junqueira,&nbsp;Irene Queiroz Marchesan,&nbsp;Luciana Regina de Oliveira,&nbsp;Emílio Ciccone,&nbsp;Leonardo Haddad,&nbsp;Maria Cândida Rizzo","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The purpose of this study was to identify and compare the results of the findings from speech-language pathology evaluations for orofacial function including tongue and lip rest postures, tonus, articulation and speech, voice and language, chewing, and deglutition in children who had a history of mouth breathing. The diagnoses for mouth breathing included: allergic rhinitis, adenoidal hypertrophy, allergic rhinitis with adenoidal hypertrophy; and/or functional mouth breathing. This study was conducted with on 414 subjects of both genders, from 2 to 16-years old. A team consisting of 3 speech-language pathologists, 1 pediatrician, 1 allergist, and 1 otolaryngologist, evaluated the patients. Multidisciplinary clinical examinations were carried out (complete blood counting, X-rays, nasofibroscopy, audiometry). The two most commonly found etiologies were allergic rhinitis, followed by functional mouth breathing. Of the 414 patients in the study, 346 received a speech-language pathology evaluation. The most prevalent finding in this group of 346 subjects was the presence of orofacial myofunctional disorders. The most frequently orofacial myofunctional disorder identified in these subjects who also presented mouth breathing included: habitual open lips rest posture, low and forward tongue rest posture and lack of adequate muscle tone. There were also no statistically significant relationships identified between etiology and speech-language diagnosis. Therefore, the specific type of etiology of mouth breathing does not appear to contribute to the presence, type, or number of speech-language findings which may result from mouth breathing behavior.</p>","PeriodicalId":77635,"journal":{"name":"The International journal of orofacial myology : official publication of the International Association of Orofacial Myology","volume":"36 ","pages":"27-32"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The International journal of orofacial myology : official publication of the International Association of Orofacial Myology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to identify and compare the results of the findings from speech-language pathology evaluations for orofacial function including tongue and lip rest postures, tonus, articulation and speech, voice and language, chewing, and deglutition in children who had a history of mouth breathing. The diagnoses for mouth breathing included: allergic rhinitis, adenoidal hypertrophy, allergic rhinitis with adenoidal hypertrophy; and/or functional mouth breathing. This study was conducted with on 414 subjects of both genders, from 2 to 16-years old. A team consisting of 3 speech-language pathologists, 1 pediatrician, 1 allergist, and 1 otolaryngologist, evaluated the patients. Multidisciplinary clinical examinations were carried out (complete blood counting, X-rays, nasofibroscopy, audiometry). The two most commonly found etiologies were allergic rhinitis, followed by functional mouth breathing. Of the 414 patients in the study, 346 received a speech-language pathology evaluation. The most prevalent finding in this group of 346 subjects was the presence of orofacial myofunctional disorders. The most frequently orofacial myofunctional disorder identified in these subjects who also presented mouth breathing included: habitual open lips rest posture, low and forward tongue rest posture and lack of adequate muscle tone. There were also no statistically significant relationships identified between etiology and speech-language diagnosis. Therefore, the specific type of etiology of mouth breathing does not appear to contribute to the presence, type, or number of speech-language findings which may result from mouth breathing behavior.

口呼吸患者的语言病理表现:根据病因进行多学科诊断。
本研究的目的是识别和比较有口腔呼吸史的儿童的口面部功能的语言病理学评估结果,包括舌和唇的休息姿势、张力、发音和言语、声音和语言、咀嚼和吞咽。口腔呼吸诊断包括:变应性鼻炎、腺样体肥大、变应性鼻炎伴腺样体肥大;和/或功能性口腔呼吸。这项研究对414名2至16岁的男女受试者进行了调查。由3名语言病理学家、1名儿科医生、1名过敏症专家和1名耳鼻喉科医生组成的小组对患者进行了评估。进行多学科临床检查(全血计数、x线、鼻纤维镜、听力学)。两种最常见的病因是过敏性鼻炎,其次是功能性口腔呼吸。在这项研究的414名患者中,346名接受了语言病理学评估。在这组346名受试者中,最普遍的发现是存在口面肌功能障碍。在这些也有口呼吸的受试者中,最常见的口面部肌功能障碍包括:习惯性张开嘴唇休息姿势,舌头低放和向前休息姿势以及缺乏足够的肌肉张力。病因学和语言诊断之间也没有统计学上的显著关系。因此,口腔呼吸的特定病因类型似乎与口腔呼吸行为可能导致的言语语言发现的存在、类型或数量无关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信