Challenges in Biomarker Discovery: Combining Expert Insights with Statistical Analysis of Complex Omics Data.

Jason E McDermott, Jing Wang, Hugh Mitchell, Bobbie-Jo Webb-Robertson, Ryan Hafen, John Ramey, Karin D Rodland
{"title":"Challenges in Biomarker Discovery: Combining Expert Insights with Statistical Analysis of Complex Omics Data.","authors":"Jason E McDermott,&nbsp;Jing Wang,&nbsp;Hugh Mitchell,&nbsp;Bobbie-Jo Webb-Robertson,&nbsp;Ryan Hafen,&nbsp;John Ramey,&nbsp;Karin D Rodland","doi":"10.1517/17530059.2012.718329","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>INTRODUCTION: The advent of high throughput technologies capable of comprehensive analysis of genes, transcripts, proteins and other significant biological molecules has provided an unprecedented opportunity for the identification of molecular markers of disease processes. However, it has simultaneously complicated the problem of extracting meaningful molecular signatures of biological processes from these complex datasets. The process of biomarker discovery and characterization provides opportunities for more sophisticated approaches to integrating purely statistical and expert knowledge-based approaches. AREAS COVERED: In this review we will present examples of current practices for biomarker discovery from complex omic datasets and the challenges that have been encountered in deriving valid and useful signatures of disease. We will then present a high-level review of data-driven (statistical) and knowledge-based methods applied to biomarker discovery, highlighting some current efforts to combine the two distinct approaches. EXPERT OPINION: Effective, reproducible and objective tools for combining data-driven and knowledge-based approaches to identify predictive signatures of disease are key to future success in the biomarker field. We will describe our recommendations for possible approaches to this problem including metrics for the evaluation of biomarkers.</p>","PeriodicalId":72996,"journal":{"name":"Expert opinion on medical diagnostics","volume":"7 1","pages":"37-51"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1517/17530059.2012.718329","citationCount":"161","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert opinion on medical diagnostics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1517/17530059.2012.718329","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 161

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The advent of high throughput technologies capable of comprehensive analysis of genes, transcripts, proteins and other significant biological molecules has provided an unprecedented opportunity for the identification of molecular markers of disease processes. However, it has simultaneously complicated the problem of extracting meaningful molecular signatures of biological processes from these complex datasets. The process of biomarker discovery and characterization provides opportunities for more sophisticated approaches to integrating purely statistical and expert knowledge-based approaches. AREAS COVERED: In this review we will present examples of current practices for biomarker discovery from complex omic datasets and the challenges that have been encountered in deriving valid and useful signatures of disease. We will then present a high-level review of data-driven (statistical) and knowledge-based methods applied to biomarker discovery, highlighting some current efforts to combine the two distinct approaches. EXPERT OPINION: Effective, reproducible and objective tools for combining data-driven and knowledge-based approaches to identify predictive signatures of disease are key to future success in the biomarker field. We will describe our recommendations for possible approaches to this problem including metrics for the evaluation of biomarkers.

生物标志物发现的挑战:结合专家见解和复杂组学数据的统计分析。
引言:能够全面分析基因、转录本、蛋白质和其他重要生物分子的高通量技术的出现,为鉴定疾病过程的分子标记提供了前所未有的机会。然而,它同时使从这些复杂的数据集中提取生物过程的有意义的分子特征的问题变得复杂。生物标志物的发现和表征过程为更复杂的方法提供了机会,以整合纯粹的统计和基于专家知识的方法。涵盖领域:在这篇综述中,我们将介绍从复杂的基因组数据集中发现生物标志物的当前实践的例子,以及在获得有效和有用的疾病特征方面遇到的挑战。然后,我们将对应用于生物标志物发现的数据驱动(统计)和基于知识的方法进行高级回顾,重点介绍目前将这两种不同方法结合起来的一些努力。专家意见:结合数据驱动和基于知识的方法来识别疾病预测特征的有效、可重复和客观的工具是生物标志物领域未来成功的关键。我们将描述我们对解决这个问题的可能方法的建议,包括评估生物标志物的指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信