Measurements of treatment response in childhood acute leukemia.

The Korean Journal of Hematology Pub Date : 2012-12-01 Epub Date: 2012-12-24 DOI:10.5045/kjh.2012.47.4.245
Dario Campana, Elaine Coustan-Smith
{"title":"Measurements of treatment response in childhood acute leukemia.","authors":"Dario Campana,&nbsp;Elaine Coustan-Smith","doi":"10.5045/kjh.2012.47.4.245","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Measuring response to chemotherapy is a backbone of the clinical management of patients with acute leukemia. This task has historically relied on the ability to identify leukemic cells among normal bone marrow cells by their morphology. However, more accurate ways to identify leukemic cells have been developed, which allow their detection even when they are present in small numbers that would be impossible to be recognized by microscopic inspection. The levels of such minimal residual disease (MRD) are now widely used as parameters for risk assignment in acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) and increasingly so in acute myeloid leukemia (AML). However, different MRD monitoring methods may produce discrepant results. Moreover, results of morphologic examination may be in stark contradiction to MRD measurements, thus creating confusion and complicating treatment decisions. This review focusses on the relation between results of different approaches to measure response to treatment and define relapse in childhood acute leukemia.</p>","PeriodicalId":23001,"journal":{"name":"The Korean Journal of Hematology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.5045/kjh.2012.47.4.245","citationCount":"18","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Korean Journal of Hematology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5045/kjh.2012.47.4.245","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2012/12/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 18

Abstract

Measuring response to chemotherapy is a backbone of the clinical management of patients with acute leukemia. This task has historically relied on the ability to identify leukemic cells among normal bone marrow cells by their morphology. However, more accurate ways to identify leukemic cells have been developed, which allow their detection even when they are present in small numbers that would be impossible to be recognized by microscopic inspection. The levels of such minimal residual disease (MRD) are now widely used as parameters for risk assignment in acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) and increasingly so in acute myeloid leukemia (AML). However, different MRD monitoring methods may produce discrepant results. Moreover, results of morphologic examination may be in stark contradiction to MRD measurements, thus creating confusion and complicating treatment decisions. This review focusses on the relation between results of different approaches to measure response to treatment and define relapse in childhood acute leukemia.

儿童急性白血病治疗反应的测量。
对化疗反应的测量是急性白血病患者临床管理的支柱。这项任务历来依赖于通过形态学在正常骨髓细胞中识别白血病细胞的能力。然而,更准确地识别白血病细胞的方法已经开发出来,即使它们存在的数量很少,用显微镜检查是不可能识别出来的,也可以检测到它们。这种微小残留病(MRD)的水平现在被广泛用作急性淋巴细胞白血病(ALL)的风险分配参数,并且越来越多地用于急性髓性白血病(AML)。然而,不同的MRD监测方法可能会产生不同的结果。此外,形态学检查的结果可能与MRD测量结果完全矛盾,从而造成混淆和复杂的治疗决策。这篇综述的重点是不同方法的结果之间的关系,以衡量对治疗的反应和定义复发在儿童急性白血病。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信