Multicity study of air pollution and mortality in Latin America (the ESCALA study).

Isabelle Romieu, Nelson Gouveia, Luis A Cifuentes, Antonio Ponce de Leon, Washington Junger, Jeanette Vera, Valentina Strappa, Magali Hurtado-Díaz, Victor Miranda-Soberanis, Leonora Rojas-Bracho, Luz Carbajal-Arroyo, Guadalupe Tzintzun-Cervantes
{"title":"Multicity study of air pollution and mortality in Latin America (the ESCALA study).","authors":"Isabelle Romieu,&nbsp;Nelson Gouveia,&nbsp;Luis A Cifuentes,&nbsp;Antonio Ponce de Leon,&nbsp;Washington Junger,&nbsp;Jeanette Vera,&nbsp;Valentina Strappa,&nbsp;Magali Hurtado-Díaz,&nbsp;Victor Miranda-Soberanis,&nbsp;Leonora Rojas-Bracho,&nbsp;Luz Carbajal-Arroyo,&nbsp;Guadalupe Tzintzun-Cervantes","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The ESCALA* project (Estudio de Salud y Contaminación del Aire en Latinoamérica) is an HEI-funded study that aims to examine the association between exposure to outdoor air pollution and mortality in nine Latin American cities, using a common analytic framework to obtain comparable and updated information on the effects of air pollution on several causes of death in different age groups. This report summarizes the work conducted between 2006 and 2009, describes the methodologic issues addressed during project development, and presents city-specific results of meta-analyses and meta-regression analyses.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The ESCALA project involved three teams of investigators responsible for collection and analysis of city-specific air pollution and mortality data from three different countries. The teams designed five different protocols to standardize the methods of data collection and analysis that would be used to evaluate the effects of air pollution on mortality (see Appendices B-F). By following the same protocols, the investigators could directly compare the results among cities. The analysis was conducted in two stages. The first stage included analyses of all-natural-cause and cause-specific mortality related to particulate matter < or = 10 pm in aerodynamic diameter (PM10) and to ozone (O3) in cities of Brazil, Chile, and México. Analyses for PM10 and O3 were also stratified by age group and O3 analyses were stratified by season. Generalized linear models (GLM) in Poisson regression were used to fit the time-series data. Time trends and seasonality were modeled using natural splines with 3, 6, 9, or 12 degrees of freedom (df) per year. Temperature and humidity were also modeled using natural splines, initially with 3 or 6 df, and then with degrees of freedom chosen on the basis of residual diagnostics (i.e., partial autocorrelation function [PACF], periodograms, and a Q-Q plot) (Appendix H, available on the HEI Web site). Indicator variables for day-of-week and holidays were used to account for short-term cyclic fluctuations. To assess the association between exposure to air pollution and risk of death, the PM10 and O3 data were fit using distributed lag models (DLMs). These models are based on findings indicating that the health effects associated with air pollutant concentrations on a given day may accumulate over several subsequent days. Each DLM measured the cumulative effect of a pollutant concentration on a given day (day 0) and that day's contribution to the effect of that pollutant on multiple subsequent (lagged) days. For this study, exposure lags of up to 3, 5, and 10 days were explored. However, only the results of the DLMs using a 3-day lag (DLM 0-3) are presented in this report because we found a decreasing association with mortality in various age-cause groups for increasing lag effects from 3 to 5 days for both PM10 and O3. The potential modifying effect of socioeconomic status (SES) on the association of PM10 or O3 concentration and mortality was also explored in four cities: Mexico City, Rio de Janeiro, São Paulo, and Santiago. The methodology for developing a common SES index is presented in the report. The second stage included meta-analyses and metaregression. During this stage, the associations between mortality and air pollution were compared among cities to evaluate the presence of heterogeneity and to explore city-level variables that might explain this heterogeneity. Meta-analyses were conducted to combine mortality effect estimates across cities and to evaluate the presence of heterogeneity among city results, whereas meta-regression models were used to explore variables that might explain the heterogeneity among cities in mortality risks associated with exposures to PM10 (but not to O3).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results of the mortality analyses are presented as risk percent changes (RPC) with a 95% confidence interval (CI). RPC is the increase in mortality risk associated with an increase of 10 microg/m3 in the 24-hour average concentration of PM10 or in the daily maximum 8-hour moving average concentration of O3. Most of the results for PM10 were positive and statistically significant, showing an increased risk of mortality with increased ambient concentrations. Results for O3 also showed a statistically significant increase in mortality in the cities with available data. With the distributed lag model, DLM 0-3, PM10 ambient concentrations were associated with an increased risk of mortality in all cities except Concepci6n and Temuco. In Mexico City and Santiago the RPC and 95% CIs were 1.02% (0.87 to 1.17) and 0.48% (0.35 to 0.61), respectively. PM10 was also significantly associated with increased mortality from cardiopulmonary, respiratory, cardiovascular, cerebrovascular-stroke, and chronic obstructive lung diseases (COPD) in most cities. The few nonsignificant effects generally were observed in the smallest cities (Concepción, Temuco, and Toluca). The percentage increases in mortality associated with ambient O3 concentrations were smaller than for those associated with PM10. All-natural-cause mortality was significantly related to O3 in Mexico City, Monterrey, São Paulo and Rio de Janeiro. Increased mortality risks for some specific causes were also observed in these cities and in Santiago. In the analyses stratified by season, different patterns in mortality and O3 were observed for cold and warm seasons. Risk estimates for the warm season were larger and significant for several causes of death in São Paulo and Rio de Janeiro. Risk estimates for the cold season were larger and significant for some causes of death in Mexico City, Monterrey, and Toluca. In an analysis stratified by SES, the all-natural-cause mortality risk in Mexico City was larger for people with a medium SES; however we observed that the risk of mortality related to respiratory causes was larger among people with a low SES, while the risk of mortality related to cardiovascular and cerebrovascular-stroke causes was larger among people with medium or high SES. In São Paulo, the all-natural-cause mortality risk was larger in people with a high SES, while in Rio de Janeiro the all-natural-cause mortality risk was larger in people with a low SES. In both Brazilian cities, the risks of mortality were larger for respiratory causes, especially for the low- and high-SES groups. In Santiago, all-natural-cause mortality risk did not vary with level of SES; however, people with a low SES had a higher respiratory mortality risk, particularly for COPD. People with a medium SES had larger risks of mortality from cardiovascular and cerebrovascular-stroke disease. The effect of ambient PM10 concentrations on infant and child mortality from respiratory causes and lower respiratory infection (LRI) was studied only for Mexico City, Santiago, and São Paulo. Significant increased mortality risk from these causes was observed in both Santiago (in infants and older children) and Mexico City (only in infants). For O3, an increased mortality risk was observed in Mexico City (in infants and older children) and in São Paulo (only in infants during the warm season). The results of the meta-analyses confirmed the positive and statistically significant association between PM10 and all-natural-cause mortality (RPC = 0.77% [95% CI: 0.60 to 1.00]) using the random-effects model. For mortality from specific causes, the percentage increase in mortality ranged from 0.72% (0.54 to 0.89) for cardiovascular disease to 2.44% (1.36 to 3.59) for COPD, also using the random-effects model. For O3, significant positive associations were observed using the random-effects model for some causes, but not for all natural causes or for respiratory diseases in people 65 years or older (> or = 65 years), and not for COPD and cerebrovascular-stroke in the all-age and the > or = 65 age groups. The percentage increase in all-natural-cause mortality was 0.16% (-0.02 to 0.33). In the meta-regression analyses, variables that best explained heterogeneity in mortality risks among cities were the mean average of temperature in the warm season, population percentage of infants (< 1 year), population percentage of children at least 1 year old but < 5 years (i.e., 1-4 years), population percentage of people > or = 65 years, geographic density of PM10 monitors, annual average concentrations of PM10, and mortality rates for lung cancer.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The ESCALA project was undertaken to obtain information for assessing the effects of air pollutants on mortality in Latin America, where large populations are exposed to relatively high levels of ambient air pollution. An important goal was to provide evidence that could inform policies for controlling air pollution in Latin America. This project included the development of standardized protocols for data collection and for statistical analyses as well as statistical analytic programs (routines developed in R by the ESCALA team) to insure comparability of results. The analytic approach and statistical programming developed within this project should be of value for researchers carrying out single-city analyses and should facilitate the inclusion of additional Latin American cities within the ESCALA multicity project. Our analyses confirm what has been observed in other parts of the world regarding the effects of ambient PM10 and 03 concentrations on daily mortality. They also suggest that SES plays a role in the susceptibility of a population to air pollution; people with a lower SES appeared to have an increased risk of death from respiratory causes, particularly COPD. Compared with the general population, infants and young children appeared to be more susceptible to both PM10 and O3, although an increased risk of mortality was not observed in these age groups in all cities. (ABSTRACT TRUNCATED)</p>","PeriodicalId":74687,"journal":{"name":"Research report (Health Effects Institute)","volume":" 171","pages":"5-86"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research report (Health Effects Institute)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The ESCALA* project (Estudio de Salud y Contaminación del Aire en Latinoamérica) is an HEI-funded study that aims to examine the association between exposure to outdoor air pollution and mortality in nine Latin American cities, using a common analytic framework to obtain comparable and updated information on the effects of air pollution on several causes of death in different age groups. This report summarizes the work conducted between 2006 and 2009, describes the methodologic issues addressed during project development, and presents city-specific results of meta-analyses and meta-regression analyses.

Methods: The ESCALA project involved three teams of investigators responsible for collection and analysis of city-specific air pollution and mortality data from three different countries. The teams designed five different protocols to standardize the methods of data collection and analysis that would be used to evaluate the effects of air pollution on mortality (see Appendices B-F). By following the same protocols, the investigators could directly compare the results among cities. The analysis was conducted in two stages. The first stage included analyses of all-natural-cause and cause-specific mortality related to particulate matter < or = 10 pm in aerodynamic diameter (PM10) and to ozone (O3) in cities of Brazil, Chile, and México. Analyses for PM10 and O3 were also stratified by age group and O3 analyses were stratified by season. Generalized linear models (GLM) in Poisson regression were used to fit the time-series data. Time trends and seasonality were modeled using natural splines with 3, 6, 9, or 12 degrees of freedom (df) per year. Temperature and humidity were also modeled using natural splines, initially with 3 or 6 df, and then with degrees of freedom chosen on the basis of residual diagnostics (i.e., partial autocorrelation function [PACF], periodograms, and a Q-Q plot) (Appendix H, available on the HEI Web site). Indicator variables for day-of-week and holidays were used to account for short-term cyclic fluctuations. To assess the association between exposure to air pollution and risk of death, the PM10 and O3 data were fit using distributed lag models (DLMs). These models are based on findings indicating that the health effects associated with air pollutant concentrations on a given day may accumulate over several subsequent days. Each DLM measured the cumulative effect of a pollutant concentration on a given day (day 0) and that day's contribution to the effect of that pollutant on multiple subsequent (lagged) days. For this study, exposure lags of up to 3, 5, and 10 days were explored. However, only the results of the DLMs using a 3-day lag (DLM 0-3) are presented in this report because we found a decreasing association with mortality in various age-cause groups for increasing lag effects from 3 to 5 days for both PM10 and O3. The potential modifying effect of socioeconomic status (SES) on the association of PM10 or O3 concentration and mortality was also explored in four cities: Mexico City, Rio de Janeiro, São Paulo, and Santiago. The methodology for developing a common SES index is presented in the report. The second stage included meta-analyses and metaregression. During this stage, the associations between mortality and air pollution were compared among cities to evaluate the presence of heterogeneity and to explore city-level variables that might explain this heterogeneity. Meta-analyses were conducted to combine mortality effect estimates across cities and to evaluate the presence of heterogeneity among city results, whereas meta-regression models were used to explore variables that might explain the heterogeneity among cities in mortality risks associated with exposures to PM10 (but not to O3).

Results: The results of the mortality analyses are presented as risk percent changes (RPC) with a 95% confidence interval (CI). RPC is the increase in mortality risk associated with an increase of 10 microg/m3 in the 24-hour average concentration of PM10 or in the daily maximum 8-hour moving average concentration of O3. Most of the results for PM10 were positive and statistically significant, showing an increased risk of mortality with increased ambient concentrations. Results for O3 also showed a statistically significant increase in mortality in the cities with available data. With the distributed lag model, DLM 0-3, PM10 ambient concentrations were associated with an increased risk of mortality in all cities except Concepci6n and Temuco. In Mexico City and Santiago the RPC and 95% CIs were 1.02% (0.87 to 1.17) and 0.48% (0.35 to 0.61), respectively. PM10 was also significantly associated with increased mortality from cardiopulmonary, respiratory, cardiovascular, cerebrovascular-stroke, and chronic obstructive lung diseases (COPD) in most cities. The few nonsignificant effects generally were observed in the smallest cities (Concepción, Temuco, and Toluca). The percentage increases in mortality associated with ambient O3 concentrations were smaller than for those associated with PM10. All-natural-cause mortality was significantly related to O3 in Mexico City, Monterrey, São Paulo and Rio de Janeiro. Increased mortality risks for some specific causes were also observed in these cities and in Santiago. In the analyses stratified by season, different patterns in mortality and O3 were observed for cold and warm seasons. Risk estimates for the warm season were larger and significant for several causes of death in São Paulo and Rio de Janeiro. Risk estimates for the cold season were larger and significant for some causes of death in Mexico City, Monterrey, and Toluca. In an analysis stratified by SES, the all-natural-cause mortality risk in Mexico City was larger for people with a medium SES; however we observed that the risk of mortality related to respiratory causes was larger among people with a low SES, while the risk of mortality related to cardiovascular and cerebrovascular-stroke causes was larger among people with medium or high SES. In São Paulo, the all-natural-cause mortality risk was larger in people with a high SES, while in Rio de Janeiro the all-natural-cause mortality risk was larger in people with a low SES. In both Brazilian cities, the risks of mortality were larger for respiratory causes, especially for the low- and high-SES groups. In Santiago, all-natural-cause mortality risk did not vary with level of SES; however, people with a low SES had a higher respiratory mortality risk, particularly for COPD. People with a medium SES had larger risks of mortality from cardiovascular and cerebrovascular-stroke disease. The effect of ambient PM10 concentrations on infant and child mortality from respiratory causes and lower respiratory infection (LRI) was studied only for Mexico City, Santiago, and São Paulo. Significant increased mortality risk from these causes was observed in both Santiago (in infants and older children) and Mexico City (only in infants). For O3, an increased mortality risk was observed in Mexico City (in infants and older children) and in São Paulo (only in infants during the warm season). The results of the meta-analyses confirmed the positive and statistically significant association between PM10 and all-natural-cause mortality (RPC = 0.77% [95% CI: 0.60 to 1.00]) using the random-effects model. For mortality from specific causes, the percentage increase in mortality ranged from 0.72% (0.54 to 0.89) for cardiovascular disease to 2.44% (1.36 to 3.59) for COPD, also using the random-effects model. For O3, significant positive associations were observed using the random-effects model for some causes, but not for all natural causes or for respiratory diseases in people 65 years or older (> or = 65 years), and not for COPD and cerebrovascular-stroke in the all-age and the > or = 65 age groups. The percentage increase in all-natural-cause mortality was 0.16% (-0.02 to 0.33). In the meta-regression analyses, variables that best explained heterogeneity in mortality risks among cities were the mean average of temperature in the warm season, population percentage of infants (< 1 year), population percentage of children at least 1 year old but < 5 years (i.e., 1-4 years), population percentage of people > or = 65 years, geographic density of PM10 monitors, annual average concentrations of PM10, and mortality rates for lung cancer.

Conclusions: The ESCALA project was undertaken to obtain information for assessing the effects of air pollutants on mortality in Latin America, where large populations are exposed to relatively high levels of ambient air pollution. An important goal was to provide evidence that could inform policies for controlling air pollution in Latin America. This project included the development of standardized protocols for data collection and for statistical analyses as well as statistical analytic programs (routines developed in R by the ESCALA team) to insure comparability of results. The analytic approach and statistical programming developed within this project should be of value for researchers carrying out single-city analyses and should facilitate the inclusion of additional Latin American cities within the ESCALA multicity project. Our analyses confirm what has been observed in other parts of the world regarding the effects of ambient PM10 and 03 concentrations on daily mortality. They also suggest that SES plays a role in the susceptibility of a population to air pollution; people with a lower SES appeared to have an increased risk of death from respiratory causes, particularly COPD. Compared with the general population, infants and young children appeared to be more susceptible to both PM10 and O3, although an increased risk of mortality was not observed in these age groups in all cities. (ABSTRACT TRUNCATED)

拉丁美洲空气污染和死亡率多城市研究(ESCALA研究)。
简介:ESCALA*项目(Estudio de Salud y Contaminación del Aire en latinoamacriica)是卫生组织资助的一项研究,目的是研究拉丁美洲九个城市暴露于室外空气污染与死亡率之间的关系,使用一个共同的分析框架获得空气污染对不同年龄组几种死亡原因影响的可比较和最新信息。本报告总结了2006年至2009年间开展的工作,描述了项目开发过程中解决的方法问题,并介绍了元分析和元回归分析的具体城市结果。方法:ESCALA项目涉及三个调查小组,负责收集和分析来自三个不同国家的城市特定空气污染和死亡率数据。这些小组设计了五种不同的规程,使用于评估空气污染对死亡率影响的数据收集和分析方法标准化(见附录B-F)。通过遵循相同的协议,调查人员可以直接比较城市之间的结果。分析分两个阶段进行。第一阶段包括分析巴西、智利和墨西哥城市空气动力学直径<或= 10pm的颗粒物(PM10)和臭氧(O3)的自然原因和特定原因死亡率。PM10和O3的分析也按年龄组分层,O3的分析按季节分层。采用泊松回归中的广义线性模型(GLM)拟合时间序列数据。时间趋势和季节性使用每年3,6,9或12个自由度(df)的自然样条曲线建模。温度和湿度也使用自然样条进行建模,最初使用3或6 df,然后根据残差诊断(即部分自相关函数[PACF],周期图和Q-Q图)选择自由度(附录H,可在HEI网站上获得)。使用星期和假日的指标变量来说明短期周期波动。为了评估暴露于空气污染与死亡风险之间的关系,使用分布滞后模型(DLMs)拟合PM10和O3数据。这些模型所依据的研究结果表明,与某一天的空气污染物浓度有关的健康影响可能在随后几天累积。每个DLM测量某一天(第0天)污染物浓度的累积效应,以及该日对该污染物在随后多个(滞后)天的影响的贡献。在这项研究中,研究人员探索了长达3天、5天和10天的暴露滞后。然而,本报告只给出了使用3天滞后的DLM (DLM 0-3)的结果,因为我们发现,在不同年龄原因组中,PM10和O3的滞后效应从3天增加到5天,与死亡率的相关性降低。在四个城市:墨西哥城、里约热内卢、圣保罗和圣地亚哥,还探讨了社会经济地位(SES)对PM10或O3浓度与死亡率之间关系的潜在调节作用。报告中介绍了制定共同社会经济状况指数的方法。第二阶段包括meta分析和meta回归。在这一阶段,死亡率和空气污染之间的联系在城市之间进行比较,以评估异质性的存在,并探索可能解释这种异质性的城市层面变量。我们进行了荟萃分析,以综合各城市的死亡率影响估计,并评估各城市结果之间存在的异质性,而荟萃回归模型则用于探索可能解释各城市与PM10(但不包括O3)暴露相关的死亡率风险异质性的变量。结果:死亡率分析结果以95%置信区间(CI)的风险百分比变化(RPC)表示。RPC是指与PM10 24小时平均浓度或O3每日最大8小时移动平均浓度增加10微克/立方米相关的死亡风险增加。PM10的大多数结果呈阳性,具有统计学意义,表明随着环境浓度的增加,死亡风险增加。O3的结果也显示,在有数据的城市中,死亡率在统计上显著增加。在分布滞后模型中,除康塞普西恩和特穆科外,所有城市的DLM 0-3、PM10浓度均与死亡风险增加相关。墨西哥城和圣地亚哥的RPC和95% ci分别为1.02%(0.87 ~ 1.17)和0.48%(0.35 ~ 0.61)。在大多数城市,PM10还与心肺、呼吸、心脑血管中风和慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)的死亡率增加显著相关。在最小的城市(Concepción, Temuco和Toluca)通常观察到一些不显著的影响。 与环境O3浓度相关的死亡率增加百分比小于与PM10相关的死亡率增加百分比。在墨西哥城、蒙特雷、<s:1>圣保罗和里约热内卢,全自然原因死亡率与O3显著相关。在这些城市和圣地亚哥,还观察到某些特定原因造成的死亡风险增加。在按季节分层的分析中,冷季和暖季的死亡率和O3有不同的模式。在圣保罗和里约热内卢,暖季的风险估计更大,对几种死因的影响也更大。对于墨西哥城、蒙特雷和托卢卡的一些死亡原因来说,寒冷季节的风险估计更大,而且意义重大。在一项按社会地位分层的分析中,墨西哥城中等社会地位人群的全自然原因死亡风险更大;然而,我们观察到,低经济地位人群与呼吸系统原因相关的死亡率风险更大,而中等或高经济地位人群与心脑血管中风原因相关的死亡率风险更大。在圣保罗,社会经济地位高的人的全自然原因死亡风险更大,而在里约热内卢,社会经济地位低的人的全自然原因死亡风险更大。在这两个巴西城市中,呼吸系统疾病的死亡率更高,尤其是低经济地位和高经济地位人群。在圣地亚哥,全自然原因死亡风险不随SES水平而变化;然而,社会经济地位低的人有更高的呼吸系统死亡风险,尤其是慢性阻塞性肺病。中等SES的人死于心脑血管中风的风险更大。环境PM10浓度对因呼吸道原因和下呼吸道感染(LRI)导致的婴儿和儿童死亡率的影响仅在墨西哥城、圣地亚哥和<s:1>圣保罗进行了研究。在圣地亚哥(婴儿和年龄较大的儿童)和墨西哥城(仅婴儿)均观察到这些原因导致的死亡风险显著增加。对于臭氧,在墨西哥城(婴儿和年龄较大的儿童)和<s:1>圣保罗(仅在温暖季节的婴儿中)观察到死亡风险增加。meta分析结果证实,采用随机效应模型,PM10与全自然原因死亡率之间存在统计学上显著的正相关(RPC = 0.77% [95% CI: 0.60 ~ 1.00])。对于特定原因的死亡率,同样使用随机效应模型,心血管疾病的死亡率增加百分比为0.72% (0.54 - 0.89),COPD的死亡率增加百分比为2.44%(1.36 - 3.59)。对于O3,使用随机效应模型对某些原因观察到显著的正相关,但对所有自然原因或65岁及以上(>或= 65岁)人群的呼吸系统疾病没有观察到显著的正相关,对全年龄和>或= 65岁年龄组的COPD和脑血管卒中没有观察到显著的正相关。全自然原因死亡率增加了0.16%(-0.02 ~ 0.33%)。在meta回归分析中,最能解释城市间死亡率风险异质性的变量是暖季平均气温、婴儿(< 1岁)人口百分比、至少1岁但< 5岁(即1-4岁)儿童的人口百分比、>或= 65岁人口百分比、PM10监测仪的地理密度、PM10年平均浓度和肺癌死亡率。结论:开展ESCALA项目是为了获取资料,以评估空气污染物对拉丁美洲死亡率的影响,因为拉丁美洲有大量人口暴露在相对较高水平的环境空气污染中。一个重要的目标是提供证据,为拉丁美洲控制空气污染的政策提供信息。该项目包括制定数据收集和统计分析的标准化协议,以及统计分析程序(ESCALA团队用R语言开发的例程),以确保结果的可比性。在这个项目内制定的分析方法和统计方案对进行单一城市分析的研究人员应具有价值,并应有助于将更多的拉丁美洲城市纳入拉美经委会多城市项目。我们的分析证实了在世界其他地区观察到的环境PM10和03浓度对每日死亡率的影响。他们还认为SES在人群对空气污染的易感性中起作用;社会经济地位较低的人死于呼吸系统疾病的风险似乎更高,尤其是慢性阻塞性肺病。与一般人群相比,婴儿和幼儿似乎更容易受到PM10和O3的影响,尽管在所有城市的这些年龄组中没有观察到死亡风险增加。(抽象截断)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信