[Improved methodology for quantitative determination of thiabendazole].

Q4 Medicine
Noriko Furusho, Noriko Otsuki, Takashi Ohtsuki, Chiye Tatebe-Sasaki, Kyoko Sato, Hiroshi Akiyama, Yoko Kawamura
{"title":"[Improved methodology for quantitative determination of thiabendazole].","authors":"Noriko Furusho,&nbsp;Noriko Otsuki,&nbsp;Takashi Ohtsuki,&nbsp;Chiye Tatebe-Sasaki,&nbsp;Kyoko Sato,&nbsp;Hiroshi Akiyama,&nbsp;Yoko Kawamura","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The method prescribed in the 8th edition of Japan's Specifications and Standards for Food Additives (JSSFA) for the quantitative analysis of thiabendazole was improved by eliminating the use of toxic reagents such as mercuric acetate and chromium trioxide. For exclusion of mercuric acetate, a nonaqueous titration was performed using four types of solvent systems, including acetic acid:acetic anhydride (1:5), acetic acid:acetic anhydride (3:7), acetic acid alone, and formic acid:acetic acid (1:10), that did not contain mercuric compounds. Because precipitates were formed in titrations using acetic acid alone and formic acid:acetic acid (1:10), we considered that it was difficult to determine the purity using these solvent systems. However, it was confirmed that the purity of thiabendazole dissolved in the two acetic acid:acetic anhydride solvent systems can be determined using either a visual indicator or potentiometry. Specifically, the purity of thiabendazole was determined to be 99.9% (relative standard deviation (RSD) = 0.07%) for acetic acid:acetic anhydride (1:5) and 99.7% (RSD = 0.13%) for acetic acid:acetic anhydride (3:7) With respect to chromium trioxide, it was determined that chromium trioxide can be excluded using acetic acid, which conforms to the JIS K8001 standard for nonaqueous titrations. Therefore, in this study, an improved method for the quantitative determination of thiabendazole was developed without the use of toxic reagents.</p>","PeriodicalId":35462,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of National Institute of Health Sciences","volume":" 130","pages":"46-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin of National Institute of Health Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The method prescribed in the 8th edition of Japan's Specifications and Standards for Food Additives (JSSFA) for the quantitative analysis of thiabendazole was improved by eliminating the use of toxic reagents such as mercuric acetate and chromium trioxide. For exclusion of mercuric acetate, a nonaqueous titration was performed using four types of solvent systems, including acetic acid:acetic anhydride (1:5), acetic acid:acetic anhydride (3:7), acetic acid alone, and formic acid:acetic acid (1:10), that did not contain mercuric compounds. Because precipitates were formed in titrations using acetic acid alone and formic acid:acetic acid (1:10), we considered that it was difficult to determine the purity using these solvent systems. However, it was confirmed that the purity of thiabendazole dissolved in the two acetic acid:acetic anhydride solvent systems can be determined using either a visual indicator or potentiometry. Specifically, the purity of thiabendazole was determined to be 99.9% (relative standard deviation (RSD) = 0.07%) for acetic acid:acetic anhydride (1:5) and 99.7% (RSD = 0.13%) for acetic acid:acetic anhydride (3:7) With respect to chromium trioxide, it was determined that chromium trioxide can be excluded using acetic acid, which conforms to the JIS K8001 standard for nonaqueous titrations. Therefore, in this study, an improved method for the quantitative determination of thiabendazole was developed without the use of toxic reagents.

噻苯达唑定量测定方法的改进。
通过取消醋酸汞、三氧化二铬等有毒试剂的使用,改进了日本第8版食品添加剂规范标准(JSSFA)中噻苯达唑定量分析的方法。为了排除醋酸汞,使用四种类型的溶剂体系进行非水滴定,包括醋酸:乙酸酐(1:5),醋酸:乙酸酐(3:7),醋酸单独,甲酸:乙酸(1:10),不含汞化合物。因为沉淀是在单独使用乙酸和甲酸:乙酸(1:10)滴定时形成的,我们认为使用这些溶剂体系很难确定纯度。然而,证实了噻苯达唑溶解在两种乙酸:乙酸酐溶剂体系中的纯度可以用目测指示剂或电位法测定。其中,对乙酸:乙酸酐(1:5)测定噻苯达唑的纯度为99.9%(相对标准偏差(RSD) = 0.07%),对乙酸:乙酸酐(3:7)测定噻苯达唑的纯度为99.7%(相对标准偏差(RSD) = 0.13%)。对三氧化铬测定醋酸可排除三氧化铬,符合JIS K8001非水滴定标准。因此,本研究在不使用有毒试剂的情况下,建立了一种改进的噻苯达唑定量测定方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信