Race adjustment for estimating glomerular filtration rate is not always necessary.

Nephron Extra Pub Date : 2012-01-01 Epub Date: 2012-12-01 DOI:10.1159/000343899
Juliana A Zanocco, Sonia K Nishida, Michelle Tiveron Passos, Amélia Rodrigues Pereira, Marcelo S Silva, Aparecido B Pereira, Gianna Mastroianni Kirsztajn
{"title":"Race adjustment for estimating glomerular filtration rate is not always necessary.","authors":"Juliana A Zanocco,&nbsp;Sonia K Nishida,&nbsp;Michelle Tiveron Passos,&nbsp;Amélia Rodrigues Pereira,&nbsp;Marcelo S Silva,&nbsp;Aparecido B Pereira,&nbsp;Gianna Mastroianni Kirsztajn","doi":"10.1159/000343899","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) is very important in clinical practice, although it is not adequately tested in different populations. We aimed at establishing the best eGFR formulas for a Brazilian population with emphasis on the need for race correction.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We evaluated 202 individuals with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and 42 without previously known renal lesions that were additionally screened by urinalysis. Serum creatinine and plasma clearance of iohexol were measured in all cases. GFR was estimated by the Mayo Clinic, abbreviated Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) and Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) formulas, and creatinine clearance was estimated by the Cockcroft-Gault (CG) formula. Plasma clearance of iohexol was used as the gold standard for GFR determination and for the development of a Brazilian formula (BreGFR).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Measured and estimated GFR were compared in 244 individuals, 57% female, with a mean age of 41 years (range 18-82). Estimates of intraclass correlation coefficients among the plasma clearance of iohexol and eGFR formulas were all significant (p < 0.001) and corresponded to the following scores: CG 0.730; obesity-adjusted CG 0.789; Mayo Clinic 0.804; MDRD 0.848; MDRD1 (without race adjustment) 0.846; CKD-EPI 0.869; CKD-EPI1 (without race adjustment) 0.876, and BreGFR 0.844.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>All cited eGFR formulas showed a good correlation with the plasma clearance of iohexol in the healthy and diseased conditions. The formulas that best detected reduced eGFR were the BreGFR, CKD-EPI, and CKD-EPI1 formulas. Notably, the race correction included in the MDRD and CKD-EPI formulas was not necessary for this population, as it did not contribute to more accurate results.</p>","PeriodicalId":56356,"journal":{"name":"Nephron Extra","volume":"2 1","pages":"293-302"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1159/000343899","citationCount":"50","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nephron Extra","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000343899","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2012/12/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 50

Abstract

Background: Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) is very important in clinical practice, although it is not adequately tested in different populations. We aimed at establishing the best eGFR formulas for a Brazilian population with emphasis on the need for race correction.

Methods: We evaluated 202 individuals with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and 42 without previously known renal lesions that were additionally screened by urinalysis. Serum creatinine and plasma clearance of iohexol were measured in all cases. GFR was estimated by the Mayo Clinic, abbreviated Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) and Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) formulas, and creatinine clearance was estimated by the Cockcroft-Gault (CG) formula. Plasma clearance of iohexol was used as the gold standard for GFR determination and for the development of a Brazilian formula (BreGFR).

Results: Measured and estimated GFR were compared in 244 individuals, 57% female, with a mean age of 41 years (range 18-82). Estimates of intraclass correlation coefficients among the plasma clearance of iohexol and eGFR formulas were all significant (p < 0.001) and corresponded to the following scores: CG 0.730; obesity-adjusted CG 0.789; Mayo Clinic 0.804; MDRD 0.848; MDRD1 (without race adjustment) 0.846; CKD-EPI 0.869; CKD-EPI1 (without race adjustment) 0.876, and BreGFR 0.844.

Conclusions: All cited eGFR formulas showed a good correlation with the plasma clearance of iohexol in the healthy and diseased conditions. The formulas that best detected reduced eGFR were the BreGFR, CKD-EPI, and CKD-EPI1 formulas. Notably, the race correction included in the MDRD and CKD-EPI formulas was not necessary for this population, as it did not contribute to more accurate results.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

在估计肾小球滤过率时,种族调整并不总是必要的。
背景:估计肾小球滤过率(eGFR)在临床实践中非常重要,尽管它没有在不同人群中进行充分的测试。我们的目标是为巴西人口建立最佳的eGFR公式,并强调种族校正的必要性。方法:我们评估了202例慢性肾脏疾病(CKD)患者和42例以前没有已知肾脏病变的患者,这些患者通过尿液分析进行了额外筛选。所有病例均测定血清肌酐和血浆碘己醇清除率。GFR采用梅奥诊所(Mayo Clinic)、肾脏疾病饮食改良(MDRD)和慢性肾脏疾病流行病学合作(CKD-EPI)公式估算,肌酐清除率采用Cockcroft-Gault (CG)公式估算。血浆碘己醇清除率作为GFR测定和巴西配方(BreGFR)开发的金标准。结果:244例患者的GFR测量值和估计值进行了比较,其中57%为女性,平均年龄41岁(18-82岁)。血浆碘醇清除率和eGFR公式之间的类内相关系数估计值均显著(p < 0.001),对应于以下评分:CG 0.730;肥胖校正CG 0.789;梅奥诊所0.804;MDRD 0.848;MDRD1(无竞态调整)0.846;CKD-EPI 0.869;CKD-EPI1(无种族调整)0.876,BreGFR 0.844。结论:所有引用的eGFR配方均与健康和患病人群血浆碘己醇清除率有良好的相关性。检测降低eGFR效果最好的配方是BreGFR、CKD-EPI和CKD-EPI1配方。值得注意的是,MDRD和CKD-EPI公式中包含的种族校正对于该人群来说是不必要的,因为它不能提供更准确的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: An open-access subjournal to Nephron. ''Nephron EXTRA'' publishes additional high-quality articles that cannot be published in the main journal ''Nephron'' due to space limitations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信