When Conventional Heart Failure Therapy is Not Enough: Angiotensin Receptor Blocker, Direct Renin Inhibitor, or Aldosterone Antagonist?

Sripal Bangalore MD, MHA, Sunil Kumar MD, Franz H. Messerli MD
{"title":"When Conventional Heart Failure Therapy is Not Enough: Angiotensin Receptor Blocker, Direct Renin Inhibitor, or Aldosterone Antagonist?","authors":"Sripal Bangalore MD, MHA,&nbsp;Sunil Kumar MD,&nbsp;Franz H. Messerli MD","doi":"10.1111/chf.12011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In patients on conventional heart failure therapy including angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, the addition of angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs), direct renin inhibitors (DRIs), or aldosterone antagonists are therapeutic options to further reduce the risk of cardiovascular events. However, whether one is preferable over the other is not known. PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases were searched for randomized clinical trials (RCTs), until March 2011, of trials testing either an ARB, DRI, or an aldosterone antagonist in patients with heart failure who were on conventional heart failure therapy with follow-up of at least 3 months. Efficacy (death, cardiovascular death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, heart failure hospitalization and composite of cardiovascular death or heart failure hospitalization) and safety (hyperkalemia, hypotension, renal failure) outcomes were compared. The authors identified 16 RCTs involving 31,429 participants that satisfied the inclusion criteria. When compared with placebo (reference rate ratio [RR] of 1), aldosterone antagonists reduced the rate of death (RR, 0.79; 95% credibility interval [CrI], 0.66–0.98), cardiovascular death (RR, 0.78; 95% CrI, 0.65–0.93), heart failure hospitalization (RR, 0.74; 95% CrI, 0.55–0.94), and the composite of cardiovascular death or heart failure hospitalization (RR, 0.73; 95% CrI, 0.55–0.90) with no difference for other efficacy outcomes. However, ARBs and DRIs did not result in any significant reduction in the rate of any of the efficacy outcomes when compared with placebo. When compared with placebo (RR=1), ARBs increased the rate of hyperkalemia (138% increase), renal failure (126% increase), and hypotension (63% increase). Similarly, aldosterone antagonists resulted in a 110% increase in hyperkalemia and DRIs with a 98% increase in hypotension. In patients with heart failure and reduced systolic function on conventional heart failure medications, the risk benefit ratio favors the addition of aldosterone antagonists over ARBs or DRIs.</p>","PeriodicalId":83668,"journal":{"name":"Congestive heart failure (Greenwich, Conn.)","volume":"19 3","pages":"107-115"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/chf.12011","citationCount":"21","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Congestive heart failure (Greenwich, Conn.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/chf.12011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 21

Abstract

In patients on conventional heart failure therapy including angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, the addition of angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs), direct renin inhibitors (DRIs), or aldosterone antagonists are therapeutic options to further reduce the risk of cardiovascular events. However, whether one is preferable over the other is not known. PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases were searched for randomized clinical trials (RCTs), until March 2011, of trials testing either an ARB, DRI, or an aldosterone antagonist in patients with heart failure who were on conventional heart failure therapy with follow-up of at least 3 months. Efficacy (death, cardiovascular death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, heart failure hospitalization and composite of cardiovascular death or heart failure hospitalization) and safety (hyperkalemia, hypotension, renal failure) outcomes were compared. The authors identified 16 RCTs involving 31,429 participants that satisfied the inclusion criteria. When compared with placebo (reference rate ratio [RR] of 1), aldosterone antagonists reduced the rate of death (RR, 0.79; 95% credibility interval [CrI], 0.66–0.98), cardiovascular death (RR, 0.78; 95% CrI, 0.65–0.93), heart failure hospitalization (RR, 0.74; 95% CrI, 0.55–0.94), and the composite of cardiovascular death or heart failure hospitalization (RR, 0.73; 95% CrI, 0.55–0.90) with no difference for other efficacy outcomes. However, ARBs and DRIs did not result in any significant reduction in the rate of any of the efficacy outcomes when compared with placebo. When compared with placebo (RR=1), ARBs increased the rate of hyperkalemia (138% increase), renal failure (126% increase), and hypotension (63% increase). Similarly, aldosterone antagonists resulted in a 110% increase in hyperkalemia and DRIs with a 98% increase in hypotension. In patients with heart failure and reduced systolic function on conventional heart failure medications, the risk benefit ratio favors the addition of aldosterone antagonists over ARBs or DRIs.

Abstract Image

当传统的心力衰竭治疗不够时:血管紧张素受体阻滞剂,直接肾素抑制剂,还是醛固酮拮抗剂?
在接受包括血管紧张素转换酶(ACE)抑制剂在内的常规心力衰竭治疗的患者中,增加血管紧张素受体阻滞剂(ARBs)、直接肾素抑制剂(DRIs)或醛固酮拮抗剂是进一步降低心血管事件风险的治疗选择。然而,其中一种是否优于另一种尚不清楚。我们检索了PubMed、EMBASE和Cochrane中央对照试验数据库,检索了截至2011年3月的随机临床试验(rct),这些试验对接受常规心力衰竭治疗的心力衰竭患者进行了ARB、DRI或醛固酮拮抗剂的测试,随访时间至少为3个月。比较疗效(死亡、心血管死亡、非致死性心肌梗死、心力衰竭住院以及心血管死亡或心力衰竭住院的复合)和安全性(高钾血症、低血压、肾功能衰竭)结局。作者确定了16项符合纳入标准的随机对照试验,涉及31429名参与者。与安慰剂相比(参考比率[RR]为1),醛固酮拮抗剂降低了死亡率(RR, 0.79;95%可信区间[CrI], 0.66-0.98),心血管死亡(RR, 0.78;95% CrI, 0.65-0.93),心力衰竭住院(RR, 0.74;95% CrI, 0.55-0.94),心血管死亡或心力衰竭住院的复合(RR, 0.73;95% CrI, 0.55-0.90),其他疗效结果无差异。然而,与安慰剂相比,arb和DRIs并没有导致任何疗效结果的显著降低。与安慰剂(RR=1)相比,ARBs增加了高钾血症(增加138%)、肾功能衰竭(增加126%)和低血压(增加63%)的发生率。同样,醛固酮拮抗剂导致高钾血症和dri增加110%,低血压增加98%。在使用常规心力衰竭药物治疗心力衰竭和收缩功能降低的患者中,风险收益比倾向于添加醛固酮拮抗剂而不是arb或DRIs。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书