Minority undergraduate programs intended to increase participation in biomedical careers.

Anne J MacLachlan
{"title":"Minority undergraduate programs intended to increase participation in biomedical careers.","authors":"Anne J MacLachlan","doi":"10.1002/msj.21350","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This article reviews a selection of undergraduate programs intended to increase successful minority participation in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics majors, potentially leading to biomedical careers. The object is to examine their structure, consider how well they address the issues of the target population, and assess the extent to which they have met/meet their goals. As a means of conducting this review, the first step is to examine the concepts used as the building blocks for program design. These concepts are found in a shared, yet often undefined, vocabulary used in most undergraduate programs for minority students. The hypothesis is that a shared vocabulary obscures a broad range of meaning and interpretation that has serious ramifications affecting student success. How these building blocks are understood and implemented strongly reflects the institution where the program is housed. The discussion further considers the nature of a number of programs created by the National Science Foundation and the National Institutes of Health specifically for underrepresented minority students and examines one program in detail, the University of California Berkeley's National Science Foundation Research Experience for Undergraduates Program in Molecular, Cell, and Evolutionary Biology. The characteristics of federally organized programs and the Research Experience for Undergraduates are contrasted with 2 very successful student-centered local programs based on a different conceptual model.</p>","PeriodicalId":51137,"journal":{"name":"Mount Sinai Journal of Medicine","volume":"79 6","pages":"769-81"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/msj.21350","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mount Sinai Journal of Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/msj.21350","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

This article reviews a selection of undergraduate programs intended to increase successful minority participation in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics majors, potentially leading to biomedical careers. The object is to examine their structure, consider how well they address the issues of the target population, and assess the extent to which they have met/meet their goals. As a means of conducting this review, the first step is to examine the concepts used as the building blocks for program design. These concepts are found in a shared, yet often undefined, vocabulary used in most undergraduate programs for minority students. The hypothesis is that a shared vocabulary obscures a broad range of meaning and interpretation that has serious ramifications affecting student success. How these building blocks are understood and implemented strongly reflects the institution where the program is housed. The discussion further considers the nature of a number of programs created by the National Science Foundation and the National Institutes of Health specifically for underrepresented minority students and examines one program in detail, the University of California Berkeley's National Science Foundation Research Experience for Undergraduates Program in Molecular, Cell, and Evolutionary Biology. The characteristics of federally organized programs and the Research Experience for Undergraduates are contrasted with 2 very successful student-centered local programs based on a different conceptual model.

少数民族本科课程旨在增加生物医学事业的参与。
这篇文章回顾了一些本科课程,旨在增加少数民族在科学、技术、工程和数学专业的成功参与,潜在地引导生物医学事业。目的是检查它们的结构,考虑它们如何很好地解决目标人群的问题,并评估它们达到目标的程度。作为进行此审查的一种方法,第一步是检查作为程序设计构建块的概念。在大多数面向少数民族学生的本科课程中,这些概念都是共享的,但往往是未定义的。假设是,一个共同的词汇掩盖了广泛的意义和解释,这对学生的成功有严重的影响。如何理解和实施这些构建模块强烈地反映了项目所在的机构。讨论进一步考虑了由美国国家科学基金会和美国国立卫生研究院专门为代表性不足的少数民族学生创建的一些项目的性质,并详细审查了一个项目,即加州大学伯克利分校的国家科学基金会本科生分子、细胞和进化生物学研究经验项目。联邦组织项目的特点和本科生研究经验与两个非常成功的基于不同概念模型的以学生为中心的地方项目进行了对比。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Mount Sinai Journal of Medicine
Mount Sinai Journal of Medicine 医学-医学:内科
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信