Distance perception in mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI).

Optometry Pub Date : 2012-04-30
Kenneth J Ciuffreda, Naveen K Yadav, Esther Han, Diana P Ludlam, Angela Peddle, Paul Hulse, Suzanne Walter, Jennifer Han
{"title":"Distance perception in mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI).","authors":"Kenneth J Ciuffreda,&nbsp;Naveen K Yadav,&nbsp;Esther Han,&nbsp;Diana P Ludlam,&nbsp;Angela Peddle,&nbsp;Paul Hulse,&nbsp;Suzanne Walter,&nbsp;Jennifer Han","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The purpose of this study was to assess monocular and binocular distance perception, and stereoacuity, in individuals with mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) who reported the symptom of \"poor depth perception\";</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Ten patients with mTBI were tested and compared with ten visually-normal asymptomatic individuals in the following areas: perceived distance, stereoacuity at distance (3 meters) and near (40 cm), and a 9-item 5-point rating-scale questionnaire related to distance perception. Distance perception was assessed under monocular and binocular viewing conditions in both clustered and isolated static environments. Magnitude estimation was used to obtain the distance perception response function of physical versus perceived distance using common objects positioned at distances of 0.77 to 12.84 meters.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean distance perception response function slopes were not significantly different in the two groups for any of the test conditions. Stereoacuity (sec arc) was slightly reduced at both near and distance in the individuals with mTBI (36 ± 24.58 and 84 ± 68.34, respectively) as compared with the normal subjects (20 ± 0 and 51 ± 9.93, respectively). The mTBI group mean symptom score was 3.24 ± 0.26 indicating a moderate problematic level;</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Similarity of the mean distance response functions in the mTBI group under monocular and binocular viewing conditions suggested that their misperception of distance was not due to a \"binocular vergence\" problem. Similarly, the slightly reduced stereoacuity in the mTBI group was not sufficient to explain their symptom of \"poor depth perception.\" Thus, it is speculated that this problem reflects a higher-level cortical perceptual phenomenon related to diffuse brain damage in areas dealing with visuo-spatial mapping.</p>","PeriodicalId":51265,"journal":{"name":"Optometry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Optometry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The purpose of this study was to assess monocular and binocular distance perception, and stereoacuity, in individuals with mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) who reported the symptom of "poor depth perception";

Methods: Ten patients with mTBI were tested and compared with ten visually-normal asymptomatic individuals in the following areas: perceived distance, stereoacuity at distance (3 meters) and near (40 cm), and a 9-item 5-point rating-scale questionnaire related to distance perception. Distance perception was assessed under monocular and binocular viewing conditions in both clustered and isolated static environments. Magnitude estimation was used to obtain the distance perception response function of physical versus perceived distance using common objects positioned at distances of 0.77 to 12.84 meters.

Results: The mean distance perception response function slopes were not significantly different in the two groups for any of the test conditions. Stereoacuity (sec arc) was slightly reduced at both near and distance in the individuals with mTBI (36 ± 24.58 and 84 ± 68.34, respectively) as compared with the normal subjects (20 ± 0 and 51 ± 9.93, respectively). The mTBI group mean symptom score was 3.24 ± 0.26 indicating a moderate problematic level;

Conclusions: Similarity of the mean distance response functions in the mTBI group under monocular and binocular viewing conditions suggested that their misperception of distance was not due to a "binocular vergence" problem. Similarly, the slightly reduced stereoacuity in the mTBI group was not sufficient to explain their symptom of "poor depth perception." Thus, it is speculated that this problem reflects a higher-level cortical perceptual phenomenon related to diffuse brain damage in areas dealing with visuo-spatial mapping.

轻度外伤性脑损伤(mTBI)的距离知觉。
背景:本研究的目的是评估轻度外伤性脑损伤(mTBI)患者的单眼和双眼距离感知和立体视敏度,这些患者报告了“深度感知差”的症状。方法:对10例mTBI患者进行了测试,并与10例视觉正常无症状的个体在以下方面进行了比较:感知距离、距离(3米)和距离(40厘米)的立体敏锐度,以及与距离感知相关的9项5分制问卷。在集群和孤立的静态环境下,在单目和双目观看条件下评估距离感知。利用距离为0.77至12.84米的常见物体,使用震级估计获得物理距离与感知距离的距离感知响应函数。结果:在任何测试条件下,两组的平均距离知觉反应函数斜率均无显著差异。与正常人(20±0和51±9.93)相比,mTBI患者在近距离和远距离的立体视灵敏度(秒弧)均略有降低(分别为36±24.58和84±68.34)。mTBI组平均症状评分为3.24±0.26,为中度问题;结论:mTBI组在单眼和双眼观看条件下的平均距离反应函数相似,提示其距离错觉并非由“双眼辐散”问题引起。同样,mTBI组的立体视敏度轻微下降也不足以解释他们“深度感知差”的症状。因此,我们推测这个问题反映了一种与处理视觉空间映射区域的弥漫性脑损伤相关的更高层次的皮层感知现象。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Optometry
Optometry OPHTHALMOLOGY-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信