Jasmine H Francis, Y Pierre Gobin, Aaron Nagiel, Ira J Dunkel, Nicole Kucine, Brian P Marr, Scott E Brodie, David H Abramson
{"title":"Thrombophilia in patients with retinoblastoma receiving ophthalmic artery chemosurgery.","authors":"Jasmine H Francis, Y Pierre Gobin, Aaron Nagiel, Ira J Dunkel, Nicole Kucine, Brian P Marr, Scott E Brodie, David H Abramson","doi":"10.1001/archophthalmol.2012.2284","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"vea, as in cases 2 and 3 in our series. In addition, on SD-OCT images from case 1, the lesions highly scatter and block OCT signal from penetrating to deeper retinal layers. In cases 2 and 3, conversely, the lesions are finer, are located along a thin portion of the inner fovea, and span the entire foveola. In cases 2 and 3, there is some evidence of partial PVD with vitreofoveal attachment on OCT. Although this OCT appearance occurs as a normal stage of PVD progression, it is possible that the white granules may form secondary to mild, persistent vitreofoveal traction. This is speculation, however, and it remains unclear why the granular opacities form. In summary, we describe SDOCT findings in 3 patients with white dot fovea. In this condition, hyperreflective granular material is visualized in the inner retinal layers of the fovea both clinically as well as on OCT. Darkly pigmented fundi seem to enhance visualization of the white foveal granules. It is unknown what the granules are composed of or what structure of the retina they represent, and further studies are needed to elucidate the pathogenesis, prevalence, and potential risk associations of white dot fovea.","PeriodicalId":8303,"journal":{"name":"Archives of ophthalmology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1001/archophthalmol.2012.2284","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/archophthalmol.2012.2284","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6
Abstract
vea, as in cases 2 and 3 in our series. In addition, on SD-OCT images from case 1, the lesions highly scatter and block OCT signal from penetrating to deeper retinal layers. In cases 2 and 3, conversely, the lesions are finer, are located along a thin portion of the inner fovea, and span the entire foveola. In cases 2 and 3, there is some evidence of partial PVD with vitreofoveal attachment on OCT. Although this OCT appearance occurs as a normal stage of PVD progression, it is possible that the white granules may form secondary to mild, persistent vitreofoveal traction. This is speculation, however, and it remains unclear why the granular opacities form. In summary, we describe SDOCT findings in 3 patients with white dot fovea. In this condition, hyperreflective granular material is visualized in the inner retinal layers of the fovea both clinically as well as on OCT. Darkly pigmented fundi seem to enhance visualization of the white foveal granules. It is unknown what the granules are composed of or what structure of the retina they represent, and further studies are needed to elucidate the pathogenesis, prevalence, and potential risk associations of white dot fovea.