Atypical Antipsychotic Use and Parkinsonism in Dementia: Effects of Drug, Dose, and Sex

Connie Marras MD, PhD , Nathan Herrmann MD , Geoffrey M. Anderson MD, PhD , Hadas D. Fischer MSc, MD , Xuesong Wang MSc , Paula A. Rochon MD, MPH
{"title":"Atypical Antipsychotic Use and Parkinsonism in Dementia: Effects of Drug, Dose, and Sex","authors":"Connie Marras MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Nathan Herrmann MD ,&nbsp;Geoffrey M. Anderson MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Hadas D. Fischer MSc, MD ,&nbsp;Xuesong Wang MSc ,&nbsp;Paula A. Rochon MD, MPH","doi":"10.1016/j.amjopharm.2012.11.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Differences between atypical antipsychotics in their potential to cause parkinsonism and risk factors for antipsychotic-induced parkinsonism are not well established. There is a particular paucity of information on this in real-world use of these drugs, outside of clinical trial settings.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>We compared the incidence of parkinsonism after new treatment with risperidone, olanzapine, or quetiapine in patients with dementia and examined the effects of dose and sex on the risk of parkinsonism.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Administrative data from Ontario, Canada between 2002 and 2010 were used to compare the incidence of a diagnostic code for parkinsonism or prescription of an anti-Parkinson medication among patients with dementia who were newly prescribed quetiapine, olanzapine, or risperidone.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>From 15,939 person-years of observation, 421 patients developed parkinsonism. Using low-dose risperidone as the reference group, the adjusted hazard ratios for developing parkinsonism were 0.49 (95% CI, 0.07–3.53) for low-dose olanzapine and 1.18 (95% CI, 0.84–1.66) for low-dose quetiapine. Comparing across drugs within the most commonly prescribed dose ranges, the incidence of parkinsonism was higher in the medium-dose olanzapine group compared with the low-dose risperidone group (hazard ratio 1.66; 95% CI 23–2.23). The adjusted hazard ratio for developing parkinsonism for men (compared with women) was 2.29 (95% CI, 1.88– 2.79).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>We found no evidence that the risk of drug-induced parkinsonism in older adults with dementia was different among quetiapine, olanzapine, or risperidone, challenging the notion that the drugs differed in their propensity to cause parkinsonism. Men appeared to be at higher risk of parkinsonism as a adverse event than women.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50811,"journal":{"name":"American Journal Geriatric Pharmacotherapy","volume":"10 6","pages":"Pages 381-389.e3"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.amjopharm.2012.11.001","citationCount":"12","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal Geriatric Pharmacotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1543594612001298","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

Abstract

Background

Differences between atypical antipsychotics in their potential to cause parkinsonism and risk factors for antipsychotic-induced parkinsonism are not well established. There is a particular paucity of information on this in real-world use of these drugs, outside of clinical trial settings.

Objective

We compared the incidence of parkinsonism after new treatment with risperidone, olanzapine, or quetiapine in patients with dementia and examined the effects of dose and sex on the risk of parkinsonism.

Methods

Administrative data from Ontario, Canada between 2002 and 2010 were used to compare the incidence of a diagnostic code for parkinsonism or prescription of an anti-Parkinson medication among patients with dementia who were newly prescribed quetiapine, olanzapine, or risperidone.

Results

From 15,939 person-years of observation, 421 patients developed parkinsonism. Using low-dose risperidone as the reference group, the adjusted hazard ratios for developing parkinsonism were 0.49 (95% CI, 0.07–3.53) for low-dose olanzapine and 1.18 (95% CI, 0.84–1.66) for low-dose quetiapine. Comparing across drugs within the most commonly prescribed dose ranges, the incidence of parkinsonism was higher in the medium-dose olanzapine group compared with the low-dose risperidone group (hazard ratio 1.66; 95% CI 23–2.23). The adjusted hazard ratio for developing parkinsonism for men (compared with women) was 2.29 (95% CI, 1.88– 2.79).

Conclusions

We found no evidence that the risk of drug-induced parkinsonism in older adults with dementia was different among quetiapine, olanzapine, or risperidone, challenging the notion that the drugs differed in their propensity to cause parkinsonism. Men appeared to be at higher risk of parkinsonism as a adverse event than women.

非典型抗精神病药物使用与痴呆患者帕金森病:药物、剂量和性别的影响
背景:非典型抗精神病药物引起帕金森病的可能性和抗精神病药物引起帕金森病的危险因素之间的差异尚未得到很好的确定。在临床试验之外,在这些药物的实际使用中,这方面的信息特别缺乏。目的比较痴呆患者接受利培酮、奥氮平和喹硫平新治疗后帕金森病的发病率,并探讨剂量和性别对帕金森病发病风险的影响。方法采用2002年至2010年加拿大安大略省的管理数据,比较新开喹硫平、奥氮平或利培酮的痴呆患者帕金森病诊断代码或抗帕金森药物处方的发生率。结果在15939人年的观察中,421例患者发展为帕金森病。以低剂量利培酮为参照组,低剂量奥氮平发生帕金森病的校正危险比为0.49 (95% CI, 0.07-3.53),低剂量喹硫平为1.18 (95% CI, 0.84-1.66)。比较最常用处方剂量范围内的药物,中剂量奥氮平组帕金森病的发病率高于低剂量利培酮组(风险比1.66;95% ci 23-2.23)。男性患帕金森病的校正风险比(与女性相比)为2.29 (95% CI, 1.88 - 2.79)。结论:我们没有发现证据表明,喹硫平、奥氮平或利培酮在老年痴呆患者中药物性帕金森病的风险有差异,这挑战了这三种药物在导致帕金森病的倾向上存在差异的观点。男性患帕金森病的风险似乎比女性高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American Journal Geriatric Pharmacotherapy
American Journal Geriatric Pharmacotherapy GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY-PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信