Isolating DNA from sexual assault cases: a comparison of standard methods with a nuclease-based approach.

Alex M Garvin, Andrea Fischer, Jutta Schnee-Griese, Andrea Jelinski, Michel Bottinelli, Gianni Soldati, Monica Tubio, Vincent Castella, Nathalie Monney, Naseem Malik, Michelle Madrid
{"title":"Isolating DNA from sexual assault cases: a comparison of standard methods with a nuclease-based approach.","authors":"Alex M Garvin,&nbsp;Andrea Fischer,&nbsp;Jutta Schnee-Griese,&nbsp;Andrea Jelinski,&nbsp;Michel Bottinelli,&nbsp;Gianni Soldati,&nbsp;Monica Tubio,&nbsp;Vincent Castella,&nbsp;Nathalie Monney,&nbsp;Naseem Malik,&nbsp;Michelle Madrid","doi":"10.1186/2041-2223-3-25","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Unlabelled: </strong></p><p><strong>Background: </strong>Profiling sperm DNA present on vaginal swabs taken from rape victims often contributes to identifying and incarcerating rapists. Large amounts of the victim's epithelial cells contaminate the sperm present on swabs, however, and complicate this process. The standard method for obtaining relatively pure sperm DNA from a vaginal swab is to digest the epithelial cells with Proteinase K in order to solubilize the victim's DNA, and to then physically separate the soluble DNA from the intact sperm by pelleting the sperm, removing the victim's fraction, and repeatedly washing the sperm pellet. An alternative approach that does not require washing steps is to digest with Proteinase K, pellet the sperm, remove the victim's fraction, and then digest the residual victim's DNA with a nuclease.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The nuclease approach has been commercialized in a product, the Erase Sperm Isolation Kit (PTC Labs, Columbia, MO, USA), and five crime laboratories have tested it on semen-spiked female buccal swabs in a direct comparison with their standard methods. Comparisons have also been performed on timed post-coital vaginal swabs and evidence collected from sexual assault cases.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For the semen-spiked buccal swabs, Erase outperformed the standard methods in all five laboratories and in most cases was able to provide a clean male profile from buccal swabs spiked with only 1,500 sperm. The vaginal swabs taken after consensual sex and the evidence collected from rape victims showed a similar pattern of Erase providing superior profiles.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In all samples tested, STR profiles of the male DNA fractions obtained with Erase were as good as or better than those obtained using the standard methods.</p>","PeriodicalId":89160,"journal":{"name":"Investigative genetics","volume":"3 1","pages":"25"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/2041-2223-3-25","citationCount":"32","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Investigative genetics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/2041-2223-3-25","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 32

Abstract

Unlabelled:

Background: Profiling sperm DNA present on vaginal swabs taken from rape victims often contributes to identifying and incarcerating rapists. Large amounts of the victim's epithelial cells contaminate the sperm present on swabs, however, and complicate this process. The standard method for obtaining relatively pure sperm DNA from a vaginal swab is to digest the epithelial cells with Proteinase K in order to solubilize the victim's DNA, and to then physically separate the soluble DNA from the intact sperm by pelleting the sperm, removing the victim's fraction, and repeatedly washing the sperm pellet. An alternative approach that does not require washing steps is to digest with Proteinase K, pellet the sperm, remove the victim's fraction, and then digest the residual victim's DNA with a nuclease.

Methods: The nuclease approach has been commercialized in a product, the Erase Sperm Isolation Kit (PTC Labs, Columbia, MO, USA), and five crime laboratories have tested it on semen-spiked female buccal swabs in a direct comparison with their standard methods. Comparisons have also been performed on timed post-coital vaginal swabs and evidence collected from sexual assault cases.

Results: For the semen-spiked buccal swabs, Erase outperformed the standard methods in all five laboratories and in most cases was able to provide a clean male profile from buccal swabs spiked with only 1,500 sperm. The vaginal swabs taken after consensual sex and the evidence collected from rape victims showed a similar pattern of Erase providing superior profiles.

Conclusions: In all samples tested, STR profiles of the male DNA fractions obtained with Erase were as good as or better than those obtained using the standard methods.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

从性侵犯案件中分离DNA:标准方法与基于核酸酶方法的比较。
背景:对强奸受害者阴道拭子上的精子DNA进行分析通常有助于识别和监禁强奸犯。然而,大量受害者的上皮细胞污染了棉签上的精子,使这一过程复杂化。从阴道拭子中获得相对纯净的精子DNA的标准方法是用蛋白酶K消化上皮细胞以溶解受害者的DNA,然后通过将精子制成颗粒,去除受害者的部分,反复洗涤精子颗粒,将可溶性DNA从完整的精子中物理分离出来。另一种不需要清洗步骤的方法是用蛋白酶K消化,将精子制成颗粒,去除受害者的部分,然后用核酸酶消化剩余的受害者DNA。方法:核酸酶方法已在一种产品中商业化,即Erase精子分离试剂盒(PTC实验室,哥伦比亚,密苏里州,美国),五个犯罪实验室已在带有精液的女性口腔拭子上进行了测试,并与其标准方法进行了直接比较。还对性交后阴道拭子和从性侵犯案件中收集的证据进行了比较。结果:对于含有精液的口腔拭子,Erase在所有五个实验室中的表现都优于标准方法,并且在大多数情况下能够从含有1500个精子的口腔拭子中提供干净的男性特征。在双方同意的性行为后采集的阴道拭子和从强奸受害者那里收集的证据显示了类似的擦除模式,提供了优越的侧写。结论:在所有测试的样本中,用Erase获得的男性DNA片段的STR谱与用标准方法获得的STR谱一样好或更好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书