The safety of peri-articular local anaesthetic injection for patients undergoing total knee replacement with autologous blood transfusion: a randomised trial.

D F Wallace, S R Emmett, K K Kang, G S Chahal, R Hiskens, S Balasubramanian, K McGuinness, H Parsons, J Achten, M L Costa
{"title":"The safety of peri-articular local anaesthetic injection for patients undergoing total knee replacement with autologous blood transfusion: a randomised trial.","authors":"D F Wallace,&nbsp;S R Emmett,&nbsp;K K Kang,&nbsp;G S Chahal,&nbsp;R Hiskens,&nbsp;S Balasubramanian,&nbsp;K McGuinness,&nbsp;H Parsons,&nbsp;J Achten,&nbsp;M L Costa","doi":"10.1302/0301-620X.94B12.29357","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Intra-operative, peri-articular injection of local anaesthesia is an increasingly popular way of controlling pain following total knee replacement. At the same time, the problems associated with allogenic blood transfusion have led to interest in alternative methods for managing blood loss after total knee replacement, including the use of auto-transfusion of fluid from the patient's surgical drain. It is safe to combine peri-articular infiltration with auto-transfusion from the drain. We performed a randomised clinical trial to compare the concentration of local anaesthetic in the blood and in the fluid collected in the knee drain in patients having either a peri-articular injection or a femoral nerve block. Clinically relevant concentrations of local anaesthetic were found in the fluid from the drains of patients having peri-articular injections (4.92 μg/ml (sd 3.151)). However, none of the patients having femoral nerve blockade had detectable levels. None of the patients in either group had clinically relevant concentrations of local anaesthetic in their blood after re-transfusion. The evidence from this study suggests that it is safe to use peri-articular injection in combination with auto-transfusion of blood from peri-articular drains during knee replacement surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":15048,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery-british Volume","volume":"94 12","pages":"1632-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1302/0301-620X.94B12.29357","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery-british Volume","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.94B12.29357","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

Intra-operative, peri-articular injection of local anaesthesia is an increasingly popular way of controlling pain following total knee replacement. At the same time, the problems associated with allogenic blood transfusion have led to interest in alternative methods for managing blood loss after total knee replacement, including the use of auto-transfusion of fluid from the patient's surgical drain. It is safe to combine peri-articular infiltration with auto-transfusion from the drain. We performed a randomised clinical trial to compare the concentration of local anaesthetic in the blood and in the fluid collected in the knee drain in patients having either a peri-articular injection or a femoral nerve block. Clinically relevant concentrations of local anaesthetic were found in the fluid from the drains of patients having peri-articular injections (4.92 μg/ml (sd 3.151)). However, none of the patients having femoral nerve blockade had detectable levels. None of the patients in either group had clinically relevant concentrations of local anaesthetic in their blood after re-transfusion. The evidence from this study suggests that it is safe to use peri-articular injection in combination with auto-transfusion of blood from peri-articular drains during knee replacement surgery.

自体输血全膝关节置换术患者关节周围局部麻醉注射的安全性:一项随机试验。
术中关节周围注射局部麻醉是控制全膝关节置换术后疼痛的一种日益流行的方法。与此同时,与异体输血相关的问题引起了人们对全膝关节置换术后控制失血的替代方法的兴趣,包括使用患者手术引流管中的液体自行输血。关节周围浸润联合引流管自身输血是安全的。我们进行了一项随机临床试验,比较在关节周围注射或股神经阻滞的患者中,血液和膝关节引流液中收集的液体中的局部麻醉浓度。在关节周围注射患者的引流液中发现了具有临床意义的局麻浓度(4.92 μg/ml (sd 3.151))。然而,没有一个接受股神经阻断的患者有可检测到的水平。两组患者再次输血后血中均无具有临床意义的局麻浓度。本研究的证据表明,在膝关节置换术中使用关节周围注射联合自关节周围引流管输血是安全的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
2 months
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信