{"title":"Preserving health in the Marcellus region.","authors":"Ruth McDermott-Levy, Nina Kaktins","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Community health nurses (CHNs) have an opportunity and responsibility to address potential environmental health issues related to shale drilling, even in the face of scientific uncertainty. Potential health impacts to air and water quality related to shale drilling are addressed within the context of the CHNs role of educator, case finder, advocate and researcher. Since 2005, an estimated 5,500 unconventional natural gas wells have been drilled in Pennsylvania's Marcellus Shale (Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection [PA DEP], n.d.), resulting in tremendous controversy throughout the state regarding impacts to human health and the environment. Although there are numerous anecdotal reports of illnesses in humans and animals living in drilling areas, there is a notable lack of peer-reviewed research on the impacts. Research efforts are underway to study these issues, including a proposed retrospective study of hospital and clinic data by Geisinger Health System's Weis Center for Research (Begos, 2012). However, CHNs have the opportunity and the responsibility to help address potential environmental health issues related to shale drilling, even in the face of scientific uncertainty. This responsibility is highlighted by the American Nurses Association's (ANA) (2003, p. 2) adoption of the Precautionary Principle, which states that \"when an activity raises threats of harm to human health or the environment, precautionary measures should be taken even if some cause and effect relationships are not fully established scientifically.\" CHN practice includes the promotion and preservation of health, and the prevention of disease, as well as assisting people in their response to illness (Maurer & Smith, 2009). In Pennsylvania's Marcellus Shale regions, CHNs must assume the critical nursing roles of educator, case finder, advocate and researcher when addressing the health needs in shale drilling communities. Unfortunately, CHNs practicing within these regions may feel unprepared to take on these roles related to unconventional gas extraction. The following discusses these CHN roles in the context of environmental health impacts of shale drilling on air and water quality.</p>","PeriodicalId":76716,"journal":{"name":"The Pennsylvania nurse","volume":"67 3","pages":"4-10; quiz 11-2"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Pennsylvania nurse","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Community health nurses (CHNs) have an opportunity and responsibility to address potential environmental health issues related to shale drilling, even in the face of scientific uncertainty. Potential health impacts to air and water quality related to shale drilling are addressed within the context of the CHNs role of educator, case finder, advocate and researcher. Since 2005, an estimated 5,500 unconventional natural gas wells have been drilled in Pennsylvania's Marcellus Shale (Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection [PA DEP], n.d.), resulting in tremendous controversy throughout the state regarding impacts to human health and the environment. Although there are numerous anecdotal reports of illnesses in humans and animals living in drilling areas, there is a notable lack of peer-reviewed research on the impacts. Research efforts are underway to study these issues, including a proposed retrospective study of hospital and clinic data by Geisinger Health System's Weis Center for Research (Begos, 2012). However, CHNs have the opportunity and the responsibility to help address potential environmental health issues related to shale drilling, even in the face of scientific uncertainty. This responsibility is highlighted by the American Nurses Association's (ANA) (2003, p. 2) adoption of the Precautionary Principle, which states that "when an activity raises threats of harm to human health or the environment, precautionary measures should be taken even if some cause and effect relationships are not fully established scientifically." CHN practice includes the promotion and preservation of health, and the prevention of disease, as well as assisting people in their response to illness (Maurer & Smith, 2009). In Pennsylvania's Marcellus Shale regions, CHNs must assume the critical nursing roles of educator, case finder, advocate and researcher when addressing the health needs in shale drilling communities. Unfortunately, CHNs practicing within these regions may feel unprepared to take on these roles related to unconventional gas extraction. The following discusses these CHN roles in the context of environmental health impacts of shale drilling on air and water quality.
社区卫生护士(chn)有机会和责任解决与页岩钻探相关的潜在环境健康问题,即使面临科学上的不确定性。页岩气钻探对空气和水质的潜在健康影响将在中国石油协会作为教育者、案例发现者、倡导者和研究人员的背景下进行讨论。自2005年以来,据估计,在宾夕法尼亚州的马塞勒斯页岩(Marcellus Shale)已经钻探了5500口非常规天然气井(宾夕法尼亚州环境保护部[PA DEP], n.d),这在全州范围内引发了关于对人类健康和环境影响的巨大争议。尽管有许多关于钻探区人类和动物患病的轶事报道,但明显缺乏对其影响的同行评议研究。研究这些问题的努力正在进行中,包括Geisinger Health System的Weis Center for Research提出的对医院和诊所数据的回顾性研究(Begos, 2012)。然而,即使面临科学上的不确定性,chn也有机会和责任帮助解决与页岩钻探相关的潜在环境健康问题。美国护士协会(ANA)(2003年,第2页)通过的预防原则强调了这一责任,该原则指出,"当一项活动对人类健康或环境造成危害的威胁时,即使某些因果关系尚未完全科学地确立,也应采取预防措施"。卫生保健实践包括促进和保持健康,预防疾病,以及协助人们对疾病作出反应(Maurer & Smith, 2009年)。在宾夕法尼亚州的马塞勒斯页岩地区,chn在解决页岩钻探社区的健康需求时,必须承担教育工作者、病例发现者、倡导者和研究人员的关键护理角色。不幸的是,在这些地区执业的chn可能没有准备好承担这些与非常规天然气开采相关的角色。下面讨论在页岩钻探对空气和水质的环境健康影响的背景下这些CHN的作用。