Socially responsible genetic research with descendants of the First Australians.

Sheila M van Holst Pellekaan
{"title":"Socially responsible genetic research with descendants of the First Australians.","authors":"Sheila M van Holst Pellekaan","doi":"10.1186/2041-2223-3-22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p> Aboriginal Australians, one of the world's indigenous peoples now outnumbered through colonization, are the most under-represented in genetic research because they feel that the benefits do not outweigh the social cost of involvement. Descendants of the First Australians have survived a period of European occupation during which time they were dispossessed of land, language and cultural identity resulting in inequities in health, education, and employment opportunities. Compared to Maori and Native American peoples, the ability to form organizations that help to control their affairs is very recent. The desire to control is understandably strong yet the 'gate-keeping' role of some organizations risks shifting the control away from smaller communities and has become increasingly politicized. In the past, research practices by Western scientists were poorly presented and have resulted in resistance to proposals that are perceived to have no beneficial outcomes for participants. In this age of advanced technological expertise in genetics, benefits to all humanity are clear to those carrying out research projects, yet not always to those being asked to participate, presenting extra challenges. Excellent guidelines for ethical conduct in research are available to assist researchers, prospective participants, and ethics committees or review boards that approve and monitor procedures. The essence of these guidelines are that research should be carried out with a spirit of integrity, respect, reciprocity, parity, recognition of survival and protection of social and cultural values, a need for control and shared responsibility. Specific Aboriginal organizations, with which researchers need to work to negotiate partnerships, vary within and between Australian states and will always expect Aboriginal personnel to be involved. People experienced in the consultation process are necessary as part of a team. By working patiently through lengthy negotiations with Aboriginal Australians, scientists can achieve valuable results, but failure to do so with respect and understanding will not yield hoped for outcomes. My own experience working with communities in the Darling River region of western New South Wales has been an enriching and rewarding one, with a long period of successful research lately delayed by increased expectation of monitoring and involvement at state level.</p>","PeriodicalId":89160,"journal":{"name":"Investigative genetics","volume":"3 1","pages":"22"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/2041-2223-3-22","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Investigative genetics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/2041-2223-3-22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Aboriginal Australians, one of the world's indigenous peoples now outnumbered through colonization, are the most under-represented in genetic research because they feel that the benefits do not outweigh the social cost of involvement. Descendants of the First Australians have survived a period of European occupation during which time they were dispossessed of land, language and cultural identity resulting in inequities in health, education, and employment opportunities. Compared to Maori and Native American peoples, the ability to form organizations that help to control their affairs is very recent. The desire to control is understandably strong yet the 'gate-keeping' role of some organizations risks shifting the control away from smaller communities and has become increasingly politicized. In the past, research practices by Western scientists were poorly presented and have resulted in resistance to proposals that are perceived to have no beneficial outcomes for participants. In this age of advanced technological expertise in genetics, benefits to all humanity are clear to those carrying out research projects, yet not always to those being asked to participate, presenting extra challenges. Excellent guidelines for ethical conduct in research are available to assist researchers, prospective participants, and ethics committees or review boards that approve and monitor procedures. The essence of these guidelines are that research should be carried out with a spirit of integrity, respect, reciprocity, parity, recognition of survival and protection of social and cultural values, a need for control and shared responsibility. Specific Aboriginal organizations, with which researchers need to work to negotiate partnerships, vary within and between Australian states and will always expect Aboriginal personnel to be involved. People experienced in the consultation process are necessary as part of a team. By working patiently through lengthy negotiations with Aboriginal Australians, scientists can achieve valuable results, but failure to do so with respect and understanding will not yield hoped for outcomes. My own experience working with communities in the Darling River region of western New South Wales has been an enriching and rewarding one, with a long period of successful research lately delayed by increased expectation of monitoring and involvement at state level.

对第一批澳大利亚人的后代进行具有社会责任感的基因研究。
由于殖民化,澳大利亚土著居民的人数已经超过了世界上的土著民族之一,他们在基因研究方面的代表性是最不足的,因为他们觉得参与基因研究的好处并没有超过社会成本。第一批澳大利亚人的后裔在欧洲人占领期间幸存下来,在此期间,他们被剥夺了土地、语言和文化身份,导致在健康、教育和就业机会方面的不平等。与毛利人和美洲原住民相比,形成组织来帮助控制他们事务的能力是最近才有的。控制的愿望是可以理解的强烈,但一些组织的“把关”角色有可能将控制权从较小的社区转移出去,并且变得越来越政治化。在过去,西方科学家的研究实践表现不佳,导致对被认为对参与者没有有益结果的建议的抵制。在这个遗传学技术专长先进的时代,对那些开展研究项目的人来说,全人类的利益是显而易见的,但对那些被要求参与的人来说,并不总是如此,这带来了额外的挑战。研究中优秀的伦理行为准则可以帮助研究人员、潜在参与者和伦理委员会或审查委员会批准和监督程序。这些准则的实质是,应本着诚信、尊重、互惠、平等、承认生存和保护社会和文化价值、需要控制和分担责任的精神进行研究。研究人员需要与特定的土著组织协商伙伴关系,这些组织在澳大利亚各州内部和各州之间各不相同,并且总是期望土著人员参与其中。在咨询过程中有经验的人作为团队的一部分是必要的。通过耐心地与澳大利亚土著居民进行漫长的谈判,科学家们可以取得有价值的成果,但如果不尊重和理解这样做,就不会产生希望的结果。我自己在新南威尔士州西部达令河地区与社区合作的经历是丰富和有益的,长期成功的研究最近因对州一级监督和参与的期望增加而推迟。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书