Translation of an evidence-based asthma intervention: Physician Asthma Care Education (PACE) in the United States and Australia.

Minal R Patel, Smita Shah, Michael D Cabana, Susan M Sawyer, Brett Toelle, Craig Mellis, Christine Jenkins, Randall W Brown, Noreen M Clark
{"title":"Translation of an evidence-based asthma intervention: Physician Asthma Care Education (PACE) in the United States and Australia.","authors":"Minal R Patel,&nbsp;Smita Shah,&nbsp;Michael D Cabana,&nbsp;Susan M Sawyer,&nbsp;Brett Toelle,&nbsp;Craig Mellis,&nbsp;Christine Jenkins,&nbsp;Randall W Brown,&nbsp;Noreen M Clark","doi":"10.4104/pcrj.2012.00093","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Physician Asthma Care Education (PACE) is a programme developed in the USA to improve paediatric asthma outcomes.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To examine translation of PACE to Australia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The RE-AIM framework was used to assess translation. Demographic characteristics and findings regarding clinical asthma outcomes from PACE randomised clinical trials in both countries were examined. Qualitative content analysis was used to examine fidelity to intervention components.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both iterations of PACE reached similar target audiences (general practice physicians and paediatric patients with asthma); however, in the USA, more children with persistent disease were enrolled. In both countries, participation comprised approximately 10% of eligible physicians and 25% of patients. In both countries, PACE deployed well-known local physicians and behavioural scientists as facilitators. Sponsorship of the programme was provided by professional associations and government agencies. Fidelity to essential programme elements was observed, but PACE Australia workshops included additional components. Similar outcomes included improvements in clinician confidence in developing short-term and long-term care plans, prescribing inhaled corticosteroids, and providing written management instructions to patients. No additional time was spent in the patient visit compared with controls. US PACE realised reductions in symptoms and healthcare use, results that could not be confirmed in Australia because of limitations in follow-up time and sample sizes. US PACE is maintained through a National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute website. Development of maintenance strategies for PACE Australia is underway.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Based on criteria of the RE-AIM framework, the US version of PACE has been successfully translated for use in Australia.</p>","PeriodicalId":48998,"journal":{"name":"Primary Care Respiratory Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.4104/pcrj.2012.00093","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Primary Care Respiratory Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4104/pcrj.2012.00093","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

Background: Physician Asthma Care Education (PACE) is a programme developed in the USA to improve paediatric asthma outcomes.

Aims: To examine translation of PACE to Australia.

Methods: The RE-AIM framework was used to assess translation. Demographic characteristics and findings regarding clinical asthma outcomes from PACE randomised clinical trials in both countries were examined. Qualitative content analysis was used to examine fidelity to intervention components.

Results: Both iterations of PACE reached similar target audiences (general practice physicians and paediatric patients with asthma); however, in the USA, more children with persistent disease were enrolled. In both countries, participation comprised approximately 10% of eligible physicians and 25% of patients. In both countries, PACE deployed well-known local physicians and behavioural scientists as facilitators. Sponsorship of the programme was provided by professional associations and government agencies. Fidelity to essential programme elements was observed, but PACE Australia workshops included additional components. Similar outcomes included improvements in clinician confidence in developing short-term and long-term care plans, prescribing inhaled corticosteroids, and providing written management instructions to patients. No additional time was spent in the patient visit compared with controls. US PACE realised reductions in symptoms and healthcare use, results that could not be confirmed in Australia because of limitations in follow-up time and sample sizes. US PACE is maintained through a National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute website. Development of maintenance strategies for PACE Australia is underway.

Conclusions: Based on criteria of the RE-AIM framework, the US version of PACE has been successfully translated for use in Australia.

循证哮喘干预的翻译:美国和澳大利亚的医师哮喘护理教育(PACE)。
背景:医师哮喘护理教育(PACE)是美国开发的一项改善儿科哮喘结局的计划。目的:考察《PACE》在澳大利亚的翻译。方法:采用RE-AIM框架对翻译进行评估。研究了两国PACE随机临床试验的人口统计学特征和临床哮喘结局的发现。定性内容分析用于检验干预成分的保真度。结果:PACE的两次迭代都达到了相似的目标受众(全科医生和患有哮喘的儿科患者);然而,在美国,更多患有持续性疾病的儿童被纳入研究。在这两个国家,大约10%的合格医生和25%的患者参与了这项研究。在这两个国家,PACE部署了当地知名医生和行为科学家作为促进者。该方案由专业协会和政府机构赞助。人们注意到忠实于基本方案组成部分,但澳大利亚PACE讲习班包括了其他组成部分。类似的结果包括临床医生在制定短期和长期护理计划、开具吸入皮质类固醇处方和向患者提供书面管理指导方面的信心的提高。与对照组相比,没有额外的就诊时间。美国PACE实现了症状和医疗保健使用的减少,由于随访时间和样本量的限制,澳大利亚无法证实这一结果。美国PACE通过国家心脏、肺和血液研究所网站进行维护。正在为澳大利亚PACE制定维修战略。结论:基于RE-AIM框架的标准,美国版PACE已成功翻译为澳大利亚使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Primary Care Respiratory Journal
Primary Care Respiratory Journal PRIMARY HEALTH CARE-RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信