Influence of complaints and singing style in singers voice handicap.

Felipe Moreti, Maria Emília Barros de Ávila, Clara Rocha, Maria Cristina de Menezes Borrego, Gisele Oliveira, Mara Behlau
{"title":"Influence of complaints and singing style in singers voice handicap.","authors":"Felipe Moreti,&nbsp;Maria Emília Barros de Ávila,&nbsp;Clara Rocha,&nbsp;Maria Cristina de Menezes Borrego,&nbsp;Gisele Oliveira,&nbsp;Mara Behlau","doi":"10.1590/s2179-64912012000300017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The aim of this research was to verify whether the difference of singing styles and the presence of vocal complaints influence the perception of voice handicap of singers. One hundred eighteen singing voice handicap self-assessment protocols were selected: 17 popular singers with vocal complaints, 42 popular singers without complaints, 17 classic singers with complaints, and 42 classic singers without complaints. The groups were similar regarding age, gender and voice types. Both protocols used--Modern Singing Handicap Index (MSHI) and Classical Singing Handicap Index (CSHI)--have specific questions to their respective singing styles, and consist of 30 items equally divided into three subscales: disability (functional domain), handicap (emotional domain) and impairment (organic domain), answered according to the frequency of occurrence. Each subscale has a maximum of 40 points, and the total score is 120 points. The higher the score, the higher the singing voice handicap perceived. For statistical analysis, we used the ANOVA test, with 5% of significance. Classical and popular singers referred higher impairment, followed by disability and handicap. However, the degree of this perception varied according to the singing style and the presence of vocal complaints. The classical singers with vocal complaints showed higher voice handicap than popular singers with vocal complaints, while the classic singers without complaints reported lower handicap than popular singers without complaints. This evidences that classical singers have higher perception of their own voice, and that vocal disturbances in this group may cause greater voice handicap when compared to popular singers.</p>","PeriodicalId":89403,"journal":{"name":"Jornal da Sociedade Brasileira de Fonoaudiologia","volume":"24 3","pages":"296-300"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1590/s2179-64912012000300017","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jornal da Sociedade Brasileira de Fonoaudiologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/s2179-64912012000300017","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of this research was to verify whether the difference of singing styles and the presence of vocal complaints influence the perception of voice handicap of singers. One hundred eighteen singing voice handicap self-assessment protocols were selected: 17 popular singers with vocal complaints, 42 popular singers without complaints, 17 classic singers with complaints, and 42 classic singers without complaints. The groups were similar regarding age, gender and voice types. Both protocols used--Modern Singing Handicap Index (MSHI) and Classical Singing Handicap Index (CSHI)--have specific questions to their respective singing styles, and consist of 30 items equally divided into three subscales: disability (functional domain), handicap (emotional domain) and impairment (organic domain), answered according to the frequency of occurrence. Each subscale has a maximum of 40 points, and the total score is 120 points. The higher the score, the higher the singing voice handicap perceived. For statistical analysis, we used the ANOVA test, with 5% of significance. Classical and popular singers referred higher impairment, followed by disability and handicap. However, the degree of this perception varied according to the singing style and the presence of vocal complaints. The classical singers with vocal complaints showed higher voice handicap than popular singers with vocal complaints, while the classic singers without complaints reported lower handicap than popular singers without complaints. This evidences that classical singers have higher perception of their own voice, and that vocal disturbances in this group may cause greater voice handicap when compared to popular singers.

抱怨与演唱方式对歌手嗓音障碍的影响。
本研究的目的是验证歌唱风格的差异和声抱怨的存在是否影响歌手对声障碍的感知。选取118个歌唱声障自评协议,其中有发声投诉的流行歌手17个,无发声投诉的流行歌手42个,有发声投诉的经典歌手17个,无发声投诉的经典歌手42个。这些群体在年龄、性别和声音类型方面相似。使用的两种方案——现代歌唱障碍指数(MSHI)和古典歌唱障碍指数(CSHI)——对各自的演唱风格都有具体的问题,由30个项目组成,平均分为三个子量表:残疾(功能领域)、残疾(情感领域)和损伤(有机领域),根据出现的频率回答。每个子量表最多40分,总分120分。得分越高,歌唱障碍越严重。统计分析采用方差分析(ANOVA)检验,显著性为5%。古典歌手和流行歌手的损伤程度较高,其次是残疾和残疾。然而,这种感知的程度根据歌唱风格和声音抱怨的存在而变化。有声音抱怨的古典歌手比有声音抱怨的流行歌手表现出更高的声音障碍,而没有声音抱怨的古典歌手比没有声音抱怨的流行歌手表现出更低的声音障碍。这证明古典歌手对自己的声音有更高的感知能力,与流行歌手相比,这一群体的声音障碍可能会造成更大的声音障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书