Chemotherapy with gemcitabine plus cisplatin in patients with advanced biliary tract carcinoma at Chang Gung Memorial Hospital: a retrospective analysis.

Chiao-En Wu, Hung-Chih Hsu, Wen-Chi Shen, Yang-Chung Lin, Hung-Ming Wang, John Wen-Chen Chang, Jen-Shi Chen
{"title":"Chemotherapy with gemcitabine plus cisplatin in patients with advanced biliary tract carcinoma at Chang Gung Memorial Hospital: a retrospective analysis.","authors":"Chiao-En Wu,&nbsp;Hung-Chih Hsu,&nbsp;Wen-Chi Shen,&nbsp;Yang-Chung Lin,&nbsp;Hung-Ming Wang,&nbsp;John Wen-Chen Chang,&nbsp;Jen-Shi Chen","doi":"10.4103/2319-4170.105476","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A gemcitabine-cisplatin combination is a standard treatment option for patients with advanced biliary tract carcinoma (BTC). We assessed the efficacy and safety of this regimen at Chang Gung Memorial Hospital.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Between April 2009 and December 2010, 30 chemotherapy-naïve patients (13 men and 17 women; median age: 61.5 years) with advanced BTC were retrospectively analyzed. Treatment consisted of gemcitabine (Gemmis(®); TTY, Taipei, Taiwan) 1000 mg/m(2), followed by cisplatin 30 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks. Tumor response was evaluated using the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) criteria every 2-3 cycles. The toxicity was assessed by the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, Version 3.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At the end of July, 2011, 27 patients were evaluated using the RECIST criteria. According to the intent to treat analysis of response, 5 patients (16.7%) had a partial response, 10 patients (33.3%) had stable disease and 12 patients (40.0%) had progressive disease. The median time to progression (TTP) and median overall survival (OS) of the 30 patients were 4.8 months and 13.4 months, respectively. The patients with biliary obstruction requiring drainage before treatment had a significantly shorter OS than those without biliary obstruction (p = 0.02) even though the TTP showed no statistically significant difference (p = 0.69) between groups. The major grade III/IV adverse events in the 30 patients included infection (n = 8, 26.7%), anemia (n = 5, 16.7%), neutropenia (n = 4, 13.3%), and elevated alanine aminotransferase (n = 2, 6.7%). There were no treatment-related deaths.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Gemcitabine plus cisplatin is a feasible chemotherapy regimen with manageable toxicity in patients with advanced BTC. Maintaining good biliary drainage is essential for these patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":10018,"journal":{"name":"Chang Gung medical journal","volume":"35 5","pages":"420-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"12","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chang Gung medical journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/2319-4170.105476","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

Abstract

Background: A gemcitabine-cisplatin combination is a standard treatment option for patients with advanced biliary tract carcinoma (BTC). We assessed the efficacy and safety of this regimen at Chang Gung Memorial Hospital.

Methods: Between April 2009 and December 2010, 30 chemotherapy-naïve patients (13 men and 17 women; median age: 61.5 years) with advanced BTC were retrospectively analyzed. Treatment consisted of gemcitabine (Gemmis(®); TTY, Taipei, Taiwan) 1000 mg/m(2), followed by cisplatin 30 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks. Tumor response was evaluated using the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) criteria every 2-3 cycles. The toxicity was assessed by the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, Version 3.

Results: At the end of July, 2011, 27 patients were evaluated using the RECIST criteria. According to the intent to treat analysis of response, 5 patients (16.7%) had a partial response, 10 patients (33.3%) had stable disease and 12 patients (40.0%) had progressive disease. The median time to progression (TTP) and median overall survival (OS) of the 30 patients were 4.8 months and 13.4 months, respectively. The patients with biliary obstruction requiring drainage before treatment had a significantly shorter OS than those without biliary obstruction (p = 0.02) even though the TTP showed no statistically significant difference (p = 0.69) between groups. The major grade III/IV adverse events in the 30 patients included infection (n = 8, 26.7%), anemia (n = 5, 16.7%), neutropenia (n = 4, 13.3%), and elevated alanine aminotransferase (n = 2, 6.7%). There were no treatment-related deaths.

Conclusions: Gemcitabine plus cisplatin is a feasible chemotherapy regimen with manageable toxicity in patients with advanced BTC. Maintaining good biliary drainage is essential for these patients.

吉西他滨联合顺铂治疗长庚纪念医院晚期胆道癌患者的回顾性分析
背景:吉西他滨-顺铂联合治疗是晚期胆道癌(BTC)患者的标准治疗选择。我们在长庚纪念医院评估了该方案的有效性和安全性。方法:2009年4月至2010年12月,30例chemotherapy-naïve患者(男13例,女17例;中位年龄:61.5岁)晚期BTC患者回顾性分析。治疗包括吉西他滨(Gemmis(®);TTY,台北,台湾)1000 mg/m(2),顺铂30 mg/m(2),第1天和第8天每3周。采用实体瘤反应评价标准(RECIST)标准每2-3个周期评估肿瘤反应。毒性根据美国国家癌症研究所不良事件通用术语标准第3版进行评估。结果:截至2011年7月底,27例患者采用RECIST标准进行评估。根据疗效分析意向,5例患者(16.7%)部分缓解,10例患者(33.3%)病情稳定,12例患者(40.0%)病情进展。30例患者的中位进展时间(TTP)和中位总生存期(OS)分别为4.8个月和13.4个月。治疗前需要引流的胆道梗阻患者的OS明显短于无胆道梗阻患者(p = 0.02),但TTP组间差异无统计学意义(p = 0.69)。30例患者中主要的III/IV级不良事件包括感染(n = 8, 26.7%)、贫血(n = 5, 16.7%)、中性粒细胞减少(n = 4, 13.3%)和丙氨酸转氨酶升高(n = 2, 6.7%)。没有与治疗相关的死亡。结论:吉西他滨联合顺铂治疗晚期BTC是一种可行且毒性可控的化疗方案。维持良好的胆道引流对这些患者至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信