Management of Acute Otitis Media: update.

Paul G Shekelle, Glenn Takata, Sydne J Newberry, Tumaini Coker, Mary Ann Limbos, Linda S Chan, Martha M Timmer, Marika J Suttorp, Jason Carter, Aneesa Motala, Di Valentine, Breanne Johnsen, Roberta Shanman
{"title":"Management of Acute Otitis Media: update.","authors":"Paul G Shekelle,&nbsp;Glenn Takata,&nbsp;Sydne J Newberry,&nbsp;Tumaini Coker,&nbsp;Mary Ann Limbos,&nbsp;Linda S Chan,&nbsp;Martha M Timmer,&nbsp;Marika J Suttorp,&nbsp;Jason Carter,&nbsp;Aneesa Motala,&nbsp;Di Valentine,&nbsp;Breanne Johnsen,&nbsp;Roberta Shanman","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Acute Otitis Media (AOM), a viral or bacterial infection of the ear, is the most common childhood infection for which antibiotics are prescribed in the United States. In 2001, the Southern California Evidence-based Practice Center conducted a systematic review of the evidence comparing treatments of AOM.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This review updates the 2001 review findings on diagnosis and treatment of uncomplicated AOM, assesses the evidence for treatment of recurrent AOM, and assesses the impact of the heptavalent pneumococcal conjugate (PCV7) vaccine on the microbiology of AOM.</p><p><strong>Data sources and study selection: </strong>Searches of PubMed® and the Cochrane databases were conducted from January 1998 to July 2010 using the same search strategies used for the 2001 report, with the addition of terms not considered in the 2001 review. The Web of Science was also searched for citations of the 2001 report and its peer-reviewed publications.</p><p><strong>Data extraction: </strong>After review by two investigators against pre-determined inclusion/exclusion criteria, we included existing systematic reviews and randomized controlled clinical trials for assessment of treatment efficacy and safety. Pooled analysis was performed for comparisons with three or more trials.</p><p><strong>Results and conclusions: </strong>Few studies were found that examined the accuracy and precision of the diagnosis of AOM. Since PCV7's introduction, AOM microbiology has shifted significantly, with Streptococcus pneumoniae becoming less prevalent and Haemophilus influenzae (HF) increasing in importance. For uncomplicated AOM, pooled analysis indicates that nine children (95% CI: 6, 20) would need to be treated with ampicillin or amoxicillin rather than placebo to note a difference in the rate of clinical success. However, in four studies of delayed treatment approaches for uncomplicated AOM, two had higher rates of clinical success with immediate antibiotic therapy while two did not, and in three studies, a marked decrease in antibiotic utilization was noted. We are unable to draw definitive conclusions regarding the comparative effectiveness of different antibiotics for AOM in children with recurrent otitis media (ROM). For ROM, long-term antibiotic administration will decrease AOM episodes from 3 to 1.5 for every 12 months of treatment per otitis prone child during active treatment (95% CI: 1.2, 2.1); however, potential consequences of long-term treatment need to be considered. Data were insufficient to draw conclusions about comparative effectiveness of different treatment strategies in subgroups of children with uncomplicated AOM. Adverse events were generally more frequent for amoxicillin-clavulanate than for cefdinir, ceftriaxone, or azithromycin. Higher quality studies and improved reporting of study characteristics related to quality are needed to provide definitive conclusions for AOM and ROM treatment options.</p>","PeriodicalId":72991,"journal":{"name":"Evidence report/technology assessment","volume":" 198","pages":"1-426"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4781272/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evidence report/technology assessment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Context: Acute Otitis Media (AOM), a viral or bacterial infection of the ear, is the most common childhood infection for which antibiotics are prescribed in the United States. In 2001, the Southern California Evidence-based Practice Center conducted a systematic review of the evidence comparing treatments of AOM.

Objectives: This review updates the 2001 review findings on diagnosis and treatment of uncomplicated AOM, assesses the evidence for treatment of recurrent AOM, and assesses the impact of the heptavalent pneumococcal conjugate (PCV7) vaccine on the microbiology of AOM.

Data sources and study selection: Searches of PubMed® and the Cochrane databases were conducted from January 1998 to July 2010 using the same search strategies used for the 2001 report, with the addition of terms not considered in the 2001 review. The Web of Science was also searched for citations of the 2001 report and its peer-reviewed publications.

Data extraction: After review by two investigators against pre-determined inclusion/exclusion criteria, we included existing systematic reviews and randomized controlled clinical trials for assessment of treatment efficacy and safety. Pooled analysis was performed for comparisons with three or more trials.

Results and conclusions: Few studies were found that examined the accuracy and precision of the diagnosis of AOM. Since PCV7's introduction, AOM microbiology has shifted significantly, with Streptococcus pneumoniae becoming less prevalent and Haemophilus influenzae (HF) increasing in importance. For uncomplicated AOM, pooled analysis indicates that nine children (95% CI: 6, 20) would need to be treated with ampicillin or amoxicillin rather than placebo to note a difference in the rate of clinical success. However, in four studies of delayed treatment approaches for uncomplicated AOM, two had higher rates of clinical success with immediate antibiotic therapy while two did not, and in three studies, a marked decrease in antibiotic utilization was noted. We are unable to draw definitive conclusions regarding the comparative effectiveness of different antibiotics for AOM in children with recurrent otitis media (ROM). For ROM, long-term antibiotic administration will decrease AOM episodes from 3 to 1.5 for every 12 months of treatment per otitis prone child during active treatment (95% CI: 1.2, 2.1); however, potential consequences of long-term treatment need to be considered. Data were insufficient to draw conclusions about comparative effectiveness of different treatment strategies in subgroups of children with uncomplicated AOM. Adverse events were generally more frequent for amoxicillin-clavulanate than for cefdinir, ceftriaxone, or azithromycin. Higher quality studies and improved reporting of study characteristics related to quality are needed to provide definitive conclusions for AOM and ROM treatment options.

急性中耳炎的治疗:最新进展。
背景:急性中耳炎(AOM)是一种病毒性或细菌性耳部感染,是美国最常见的儿童感染,需要使用抗生素治疗。2001年,南加州循证实践中心(Southern California evidence -based Practice Center)对比较AOM治疗方法的证据进行了系统回顾。目的:这篇综述更新了2001年关于无并发症AOM的诊断和治疗的综述结果,评估了治疗复发性AOM的证据,并评估了七价肺炎球菌结合疫苗(PCV7)对AOM微生物学的影响。数据来源和研究选择:1998年1月至2010年7月对PubMed®和Cochrane数据库进行检索,使用与2001年报告相同的检索策略,并添加了2001年综述中未考虑的术语。科学网还搜索了2001年报告及其同行评议出版物的引用。资料提取:经过两位研究者对预先确定的纳入/排除标准的审查,我们纳入了现有的系统评价和随机对照临床试验,以评估治疗的有效性和安全性。对三个或更多试验的比较进行合并分析。结果与结论:有关AOM诊断的准确性和精密度的研究很少。自PCV7引入以来,AOM微生物学发生了重大变化,肺炎链球菌变得不那么流行,而流感嗜血杆菌(HF)的重要性日益增加。对于无并发症的AOM,汇总分析表明,9名儿童(95% CI: 6,20)需要用氨苄西林或阿莫西林治疗,而不是安慰剂,以注意到临床成功率的差异。然而,在四项关于延迟治疗方法治疗非复杂性AOM的研究中,有两项研究表明,立即使用抗生素治疗的临床成功率更高,而另两项研究则没有,在三项研究中,抗生素使用率明显下降。关于不同抗生素治疗复发性中耳炎(ROM)儿童AOM的比较有效性,我们无法得出明确的结论。对于ROM,在积极治疗期间,长期抗生素治疗将使每个中耳炎易感儿童每12个月的AOM发作从3次减少到1.5次(95% CI: 1.2, 2.1);然而,需要考虑长期治疗的潜在后果。数据不足,无法得出不同治疗策略在无并发症AOM儿童亚组中比较有效性的结论。阿莫西林-克拉维酸的不良事件通常比头孢地尼、头孢曲松或阿奇霉素更频繁。需要更高质量的研究和改进与质量相关的研究特征的报告,以便为AOM和ROM治疗方案提供明确的结论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信