In Vitro Effects of External Pressure Changes on the Sealing Ability under Simulated Diving Conditions.

ISRN dentistry Pub Date : 2012-01-01 Epub Date: 2012-10-15 DOI:10.5402/2012/418609
Marcus Stoetzer, Martin Ruecker, Andreas Koch, Dirk Ziebolz, Horst Kokemüller, Christina Kaempf, Nils-Claudius Gellrich, Constantin von See
{"title":"In Vitro Effects of External Pressure Changes on the Sealing Ability under Simulated Diving Conditions.","authors":"Marcus Stoetzer,&nbsp;Martin Ruecker,&nbsp;Andreas Koch,&nbsp;Dirk Ziebolz,&nbsp;Horst Kokemüller,&nbsp;Christina Kaempf,&nbsp;Nils-Claudius Gellrich,&nbsp;Constantin von See","doi":"10.5402/2012/418609","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Aim. To measure and validate the permeability of pressure changes in correlation to different root filling techniques. Methods. Eighty extracted single-rooted teeth were randomly assigned to one of eight groups of ten teeth. Following standardized instrumentation and irrigation, root canal fillings were performed using either cold lateral condensation, a warm carrier-based gutta-percha obturation technique, a warm carrier-based Resilon, or warm gutta-percha compaction with the downpack/backfill technique. After insertion of a pressure sensor within the pulp chamber ten teeth of each group then underwent simulated dives with pressure measurement and the other ten a dye penetration test during simulated dives to 5.0 bar. Differences were analyzed statistically (P < 0.05) using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). Results. When the warm carrier-based gutta-percha obturation technique and vertical gutta-percha obturation techniques were used, there was significant lower intrapulpal pressure to experimental chamber pressure (P > 0.05). When cold lateral condensation or carrier-based Resilon as used, pressure was sometimes almost completely equalized. Conclusions. Warm gutta-percha obturation techniques provide a largely pressure-tight seal whereas the Resilon obturation technique and cold lateral condensation appear to be unsuitable to pressure changes.</p>","PeriodicalId":89396,"journal":{"name":"ISRN dentistry","volume":"2012 ","pages":"418609"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.5402/2012/418609","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ISRN dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5402/2012/418609","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2012/10/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Aim. To measure and validate the permeability of pressure changes in correlation to different root filling techniques. Methods. Eighty extracted single-rooted teeth were randomly assigned to one of eight groups of ten teeth. Following standardized instrumentation and irrigation, root canal fillings were performed using either cold lateral condensation, a warm carrier-based gutta-percha obturation technique, a warm carrier-based Resilon, or warm gutta-percha compaction with the downpack/backfill technique. After insertion of a pressure sensor within the pulp chamber ten teeth of each group then underwent simulated dives with pressure measurement and the other ten a dye penetration test during simulated dives to 5.0 bar. Differences were analyzed statistically (P < 0.05) using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). Results. When the warm carrier-based gutta-percha obturation technique and vertical gutta-percha obturation techniques were used, there was significant lower intrapulpal pressure to experimental chamber pressure (P > 0.05). When cold lateral condensation or carrier-based Resilon as used, pressure was sometimes almost completely equalized. Conclusions. Warm gutta-percha obturation techniques provide a largely pressure-tight seal whereas the Resilon obturation technique and cold lateral condensation appear to be unsuitable to pressure changes.

模拟潜水条件下外压力变化对密封能力的体外影响
的目标。测量并验证不同根充填技术对渗透性压力变化的影响。方法。80颗拔除的单根牙齿被随机分配到8组,每组10颗牙齿。在标准化仪器和冲洗后,使用冷侧冷凝、基于热载体的杜胶封闭技术、基于热载体的Resilon或采用下包/回填技术的热杜胶压实进行根管充填。在牙髓腔内插入压力传感器后,每组10颗牙进行模拟潜水并测量压力,另外10颗牙在模拟潜水期间进行染料渗透测试至5.0 bar。差异采用单因素方差分析(ANOVA)进行统计学分析(P < 0.05)。结果。采用温载体型杜胶充填技术和垂直型杜胶充填技术时,牙髓内压明显低于实验室压(P > 0.05)。当使用冷侧冷凝或基于载体的Resilon时,压力有时几乎完全均匀。结论。温胶胶密封技术提供了很大程度上的密闭性,而Resilon密封技术和冷侧冷凝似乎不适合压力变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信