Initial experience in single-incision transumbilical laparoscopic liver resection: indications, potential benefits, and limitations.

Giovanni Dapri, Livia Dimarco, Guy-Bernard Cadière, Vincent Donckier
{"title":"Initial experience in single-incision transumbilical laparoscopic liver resection: indications, potential benefits, and limitations.","authors":"Giovanni Dapri,&nbsp;Livia Dimarco,&nbsp;Guy-Bernard Cadière,&nbsp;Vincent Donckier","doi":"10.1155/2012/921973","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Background. Single-incision transumbilical laparoscopic liver resection (SITLLR) has been recently described in limited series. We report our experience in SITLLR and discuss the future of this approach in terms of indications, potential benefits, and limitations, with a special reference to laparoscopic liver resection (LLR). Patients and Methods. Six patients underwent SITLLR. Indications were biliary cysts (3 cases), hydatid cysts (2), and colorectal liver metastasis (1). Procedures consisted in cysts unroofing, left lateral lobectomy, pericystectomy, and wedge resection. SITLLR was performed with 11 mm reusable trocar, 10 or 5 mm 30° scopes, 10 mm ultrasound probe, curved reusable instruments, and straight disposable bipolar shears. Results. Neither conversion to open surgery nor insertion of supplementary trocars was necessary. Median laparoscopic time was 105.5 minutes and median blood loss 275 mL. Median final umbilical scar length was 1.5 cm, and median length of stay was 4 days. No early or late complications occurred. Conclusion. SITLLR remains a challenging procedure. It is feasible in highly selected patients, requiring experience in hepatobiliary and laparoscopic surgery and skills in single-incision laparoscopy. Apart from cosmetic benefit, our experience and literature review did not show significant advantages if compared with multiport LLR, underlying that specific indications remain to be established.</p>","PeriodicalId":77165,"journal":{"name":"HPB surgery : a world journal of hepatic, pancreatic and biliary surgery","volume":"2012 ","pages":"921973"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2012/921973","citationCount":"19","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"HPB surgery : a world journal of hepatic, pancreatic and biliary surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/921973","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2012/9/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 19

Abstract

Background. Single-incision transumbilical laparoscopic liver resection (SITLLR) has been recently described in limited series. We report our experience in SITLLR and discuss the future of this approach in terms of indications, potential benefits, and limitations, with a special reference to laparoscopic liver resection (LLR). Patients and Methods. Six patients underwent SITLLR. Indications were biliary cysts (3 cases), hydatid cysts (2), and colorectal liver metastasis (1). Procedures consisted in cysts unroofing, left lateral lobectomy, pericystectomy, and wedge resection. SITLLR was performed with 11 mm reusable trocar, 10 or 5 mm 30° scopes, 10 mm ultrasound probe, curved reusable instruments, and straight disposable bipolar shears. Results. Neither conversion to open surgery nor insertion of supplementary trocars was necessary. Median laparoscopic time was 105.5 minutes and median blood loss 275 mL. Median final umbilical scar length was 1.5 cm, and median length of stay was 4 days. No early or late complications occurred. Conclusion. SITLLR remains a challenging procedure. It is feasible in highly selected patients, requiring experience in hepatobiliary and laparoscopic surgery and skills in single-incision laparoscopy. Apart from cosmetic benefit, our experience and literature review did not show significant advantages if compared with multiport LLR, underlying that specific indications remain to be established.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

单切口经脐腹腔镜肝切除术的初步经验:指征、潜在益处和局限性。
背景。单切口经脐腹腔镜肝切除术(SITLLR)最近在有限的系列中被描述。我们报告了我们在SITLLR中的经验,并从适应症、潜在益处和局限性方面讨论了该方法的未来,并特别提到了腹腔镜肝切除术(LLR)。患者和方法。6例患者行SITLLR。适应症为胆道囊肿(3例)、包虫病(2例)、结直肠肝转移(1例)。手术包括囊肿去顶、左叶外侧切除术、包膜切除术和楔形切除术。SITLLR使用11mm可重复使用套管针,10或5mm 30°范围,10mm超声探头,弯曲可重复使用的仪器,直的一次性双极剪刀。结果。无需转开腹手术或插入辅助套管针。中位腹腔镜时间105.5分钟,中位失血量275 mL。中位最终脐瘢痕长度为1.5 cm,中位住院时间为4天。无早期或晚期并发症发生。结论。然而,llr仍然是一个具有挑战性的过程。在高度选择性的患者中是可行的,需要肝胆、腹腔镜手术经验和单切口腹腔镜手术技能。除了美容方面的好处,我们的经验和文献回顾显示,与多端口LLR相比,没有明显的优势,这意味着具体的适应症仍有待建立。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信