The Global Economic Cost of Osteoarthritis: How the UK Compares.

Arthritis Pub Date : 2012-01-01 Epub Date: 2012-10-02 DOI:10.1155/2012/698709
A Chen, C Gupte, K Akhtar, P Smith, J Cobb
{"title":"The Global Economic Cost of Osteoarthritis: How the UK Compares.","authors":"A Chen, C Gupte, K Akhtar, P Smith, J Cobb","doi":"10.1155/2012/698709","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Aims. To examine all relevant literature on the economic costs of osteoarthritis in the UK, and to compare such costs globally. Methods. A search of MEDLINE was performed. The search was expanded beyond peer-reviewed journals into publications by the department of health, national orthopaedic associations, national authorities and registries, and arthritis charities. Results. No UK studies were identified in the literature search. 3 European, 6 North American, and 2 Asian studies were reviewed. Significant variation in direct and indirect costs were seen in these studies. Costs for topical and oral NSAIDs were estimated to be £19.2 million and £25.65 million, respectively. Cost of hip and knee replacements was estimated to exceed £850 million, arthroscopic surgery for osteoarthritis was estimated to be £1.34 million. Indirect costs from OA caused a loss of economic production over £3.2 billion, £43 million was spent on community services and £215 million on social services for osteoarthritis. Conclusions. While estimates of economic costs can be made using information from non-published data, there remains a lack of original research looking at the direct or indirect costs of osteoarthritis in the UK. Differing methodology in calculating costs from overseas studies makes direct comparison with the UK difficult.</p>","PeriodicalId":89323,"journal":{"name":"Arthritis","volume":"2012 ","pages":"698709"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3467755/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arthritis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/698709","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2012/10/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims. To examine all relevant literature on the economic costs of osteoarthritis in the UK, and to compare such costs globally. Methods. A search of MEDLINE was performed. The search was expanded beyond peer-reviewed journals into publications by the department of health, national orthopaedic associations, national authorities and registries, and arthritis charities. Results. No UK studies were identified in the literature search. 3 European, 6 North American, and 2 Asian studies were reviewed. Significant variation in direct and indirect costs were seen in these studies. Costs for topical and oral NSAIDs were estimated to be £19.2 million and £25.65 million, respectively. Cost of hip and knee replacements was estimated to exceed £850 million, arthroscopic surgery for osteoarthritis was estimated to be £1.34 million. Indirect costs from OA caused a loss of economic production over £3.2 billion, £43 million was spent on community services and £215 million on social services for osteoarthritis. Conclusions. While estimates of economic costs can be made using information from non-published data, there remains a lack of original research looking at the direct or indirect costs of osteoarthritis in the UK. Differing methodology in calculating costs from overseas studies makes direct comparison with the UK difficult.

Abstract Image

骨关节炎的全球经济成本:英国的比较。
目的研究英国骨关节炎经济成本的所有相关文献,并对这些成本进行全球比较。方法。对 MEDLINE 进行检索。除同行评审期刊外,还对卫生部、国家骨科协会、国家机构和登记处以及关节炎慈善机构的出版物进行了搜索。结果。文献检索中未发现英国的研究。审查了 3 项欧洲研究、6 项北美研究和 2 项亚洲研究。这些研究的直接和间接成本差异显著。局部和口服非甾体抗炎药的成本估计分别为 1920 万英镑和 2565 万英镑。髋关节和膝关节置换术的成本估计超过 8.5 亿英镑,骨关节炎关节镜手术的成本估计为 134 万英镑。OA的间接成本造成的经济损失超过32亿英镑,社区服务成本为4300万英镑,骨关节炎的社会服务成本为2.15亿英镑。结论。虽然可以利用非公开数据中的信息对经济成本进行估算,但英国仍然缺乏对骨关节炎直接或间接成本的原创性研究。海外研究的成本计算方法各不相同,因此很难与英国进行直接比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书