Maximum-entropy-method charge densities based on structure-factor extraction with the commonly used Rietveld refinement programs GSAS, FullProf and Jana2006.

IF 1.8 4区 材料科学
Acta Crystallographica Section A Pub Date : 2012-11-01 Epub Date: 2012-10-18 DOI:10.1107/S0108767312037269
Niels Bindzus, Bo Brummerstedt Iversen
{"title":"Maximum-entropy-method charge densities based on structure-factor extraction with the commonly used Rietveld refinement programs GSAS, FullProf and Jana2006.","authors":"Niels Bindzus,&nbsp;Bo Brummerstedt Iversen","doi":"10.1107/S0108767312037269","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Structure-factor extractions in commonly used Rietveld refinement programs (FullProf, Jana2006 and GSAS) were examined with respect to subsequent calculation of electron-density distributions (EDDs) using the maximum entropy method (MEM). As a test case, 90 K synchrotron powder X-ray diffraction data were collected on the potential hydrogen storage material, NaGaH(4), at SPring-8, Japan. To support the model, neutron powder diffraction data were collected on the fully deuterated sample at PSI, Switzerland. Firstly, it was established whether the programs can produce observed structure factors, F(obs), corrected for anomalous dispersion and scaled to the scattering power of one unit cell. Secondly, different models for background and peak-shape description were investigated with respect to the extracted F(obs), and the effect on the subsequent MEM EDDs was analysed within the quantum theory of atoms in molecules. Substantial differences are observed in the estimated standard deviations, σ(obs), produced by the different programs. Since σ(obs) is a vital parameter in the calculation of MEM EDDs this leads to substantial variation between the MEM EDDs obtained with different Rietveld programs even in cases with similar F(obs). A new approach for selecting an optimized MEM EDD and thereby minimizing the effect of variation in σ(obs) is suggested.</p>","PeriodicalId":7400,"journal":{"name":"Acta Crystallographica Section A","volume":"68 Pt 6","pages":"750-62"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2012-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1107/S0108767312037269","citationCount":"36","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Crystallographica Section A","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1107/S0108767312037269","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2012/10/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 36

Abstract

Structure-factor extractions in commonly used Rietveld refinement programs (FullProf, Jana2006 and GSAS) were examined with respect to subsequent calculation of electron-density distributions (EDDs) using the maximum entropy method (MEM). As a test case, 90 K synchrotron powder X-ray diffraction data were collected on the potential hydrogen storage material, NaGaH(4), at SPring-8, Japan. To support the model, neutron powder diffraction data were collected on the fully deuterated sample at PSI, Switzerland. Firstly, it was established whether the programs can produce observed structure factors, F(obs), corrected for anomalous dispersion and scaled to the scattering power of one unit cell. Secondly, different models for background and peak-shape description were investigated with respect to the extracted F(obs), and the effect on the subsequent MEM EDDs was analysed within the quantum theory of atoms in molecules. Substantial differences are observed in the estimated standard deviations, σ(obs), produced by the different programs. Since σ(obs) is a vital parameter in the calculation of MEM EDDs this leads to substantial variation between the MEM EDDs obtained with different Rietveld programs even in cases with similar F(obs). A new approach for selecting an optimized MEM EDD and thereby minimizing the effect of variation in σ(obs) is suggested.

基于结构因子提取的最大熵法电荷密度,使用常用的Rietveld细化程序GSAS, FullProf和Jana2006。
在常用的Rietveld细化程序(FullProf, Jana2006和GSAS)中,结构因子提取与随后使用最大熵法(MEM)计算电子密度分布(EDDs)进行了检验。作为测试用例,在日本SPring-8收集了潜在储氢材料NaGaH(4)的90 K同步加速器粉末x射线衍射数据。为了支持该模型,在瑞士PSI的全氘化样品上收集了中子粉末衍射数据。首先,确定程序是否能够产生观测到的结构因子F(obs), F(obs)对异常色散进行了校正,并按比例缩放为一个单元的散射功率。其次,针对提取的F(obs),研究了不同的背景和峰形描述模型,并在分子原子量子理论中分析了其对后续MEM EDDs的影响。不同程序产生的估计标准差σ(obs)存在显著差异。由于σ(obs)是计算MEM EDDs的一个重要参数,这导致即使在F(obs)相似的情况下,用不同的Rietveld程序得到的MEM EDDs之间也有很大的差异。提出了一种新的方法来选择最优的MEM EDD,从而使σ(obs)变化的影响最小化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
11.10%
发文量
0
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Acta Crystallographica Section A: Foundations and Advances publishes articles reporting advances in the theory and practice of all areas of crystallography in the broadest sense. As well as traditional crystallography, this includes nanocrystals, metacrystals, amorphous materials, quasicrystals, synchrotron and XFEL studies, coherent scattering, diffraction imaging, time-resolved studies and the structure of strain and defects in materials. The journal has two parts, a rapid-publication Advances section and the traditional Foundations section. Articles for the Advances section are of particularly high value and impact. They receive expedited treatment and may be highlighted by an accompanying scientific commentary article and a press release. Further details are given in the November 2013 Editorial. The central themes of the journal are, on the one hand, experimental and theoretical studies of the properties and arrangements of atoms, ions and molecules in condensed matter, periodic, quasiperiodic or amorphous, ideal or real, and, on the other, the theoretical and experimental aspects of the various methods to determine these properties and arrangements.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信