Maximum-entropy-method charge densities based on structure-factor extraction with the commonly used Rietveld refinement programs GSAS, FullProf and Jana2006.
{"title":"Maximum-entropy-method charge densities based on structure-factor extraction with the commonly used Rietveld refinement programs GSAS, FullProf and Jana2006.","authors":"Niels Bindzus, Bo Brummerstedt Iversen","doi":"10.1107/S0108767312037269","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Structure-factor extractions in commonly used Rietveld refinement programs (FullProf, Jana2006 and GSAS) were examined with respect to subsequent calculation of electron-density distributions (EDDs) using the maximum entropy method (MEM). As a test case, 90 K synchrotron powder X-ray diffraction data were collected on the potential hydrogen storage material, NaGaH(4), at SPring-8, Japan. To support the model, neutron powder diffraction data were collected on the fully deuterated sample at PSI, Switzerland. Firstly, it was established whether the programs can produce observed structure factors, F(obs), corrected for anomalous dispersion and scaled to the scattering power of one unit cell. Secondly, different models for background and peak-shape description were investigated with respect to the extracted F(obs), and the effect on the subsequent MEM EDDs was analysed within the quantum theory of atoms in molecules. Substantial differences are observed in the estimated standard deviations, σ(obs), produced by the different programs. Since σ(obs) is a vital parameter in the calculation of MEM EDDs this leads to substantial variation between the MEM EDDs obtained with different Rietveld programs even in cases with similar F(obs). A new approach for selecting an optimized MEM EDD and thereby minimizing the effect of variation in σ(obs) is suggested.</p>","PeriodicalId":7400,"journal":{"name":"Acta Crystallographica Section A","volume":"68 Pt 6","pages":"750-62"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2012-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1107/S0108767312037269","citationCount":"36","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Crystallographica Section A","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1107/S0108767312037269","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2012/10/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 36
Abstract
Structure-factor extractions in commonly used Rietveld refinement programs (FullProf, Jana2006 and GSAS) were examined with respect to subsequent calculation of electron-density distributions (EDDs) using the maximum entropy method (MEM). As a test case, 90 K synchrotron powder X-ray diffraction data were collected on the potential hydrogen storage material, NaGaH(4), at SPring-8, Japan. To support the model, neutron powder diffraction data were collected on the fully deuterated sample at PSI, Switzerland. Firstly, it was established whether the programs can produce observed structure factors, F(obs), corrected for anomalous dispersion and scaled to the scattering power of one unit cell. Secondly, different models for background and peak-shape description were investigated with respect to the extracted F(obs), and the effect on the subsequent MEM EDDs was analysed within the quantum theory of atoms in molecules. Substantial differences are observed in the estimated standard deviations, σ(obs), produced by the different programs. Since σ(obs) is a vital parameter in the calculation of MEM EDDs this leads to substantial variation between the MEM EDDs obtained with different Rietveld programs even in cases with similar F(obs). A new approach for selecting an optimized MEM EDD and thereby minimizing the effect of variation in σ(obs) is suggested.
期刊介绍:
Acta Crystallographica Section A: Foundations and Advances publishes articles reporting advances in the theory and practice of all areas of crystallography in the broadest sense. As well as traditional crystallography, this includes nanocrystals, metacrystals, amorphous materials, quasicrystals, synchrotron and XFEL studies, coherent scattering, diffraction imaging, time-resolved studies and the structure of strain and defects in materials.
The journal has two parts, a rapid-publication Advances section and the traditional Foundations section. Articles for the Advances section are of particularly high value and impact. They receive expedited treatment and may be highlighted by an accompanying scientific commentary article and a press release. Further details are given in the November 2013 Editorial.
The central themes of the journal are, on the one hand, experimental and theoretical studies of the properties and arrangements of atoms, ions and molecules in condensed matter, periodic, quasiperiodic or amorphous, ideal or real, and, on the other, the theoretical and experimental aspects of the various methods to determine these properties and arrangements.