To Tell or Not to Tell: Shared Decision Making, CAM Use and Disclosure Among Underserved Patients with Rheumatic Diseases.

Integrative medicine insights Pub Date : 2012-01-01 Epub Date: 2012-10-03 DOI:10.4137/IMI.S10333
Gwenyth R Wallen, Alyssa T Brooks
{"title":"To Tell or Not to Tell: Shared Decision Making, CAM Use and Disclosure Among Underserved Patients with Rheumatic Diseases.","authors":"Gwenyth R Wallen,&nbsp;Alyssa T Brooks","doi":"10.4137/IMI.S10333","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The purpose of this analysis was to assess the impact of perceived shared decision-making (SDM) on complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) use and disclosure in a sample of urban, underserved minority patients (n = 109) with rheumatic diseases. Nearly three quarters of the patients (71.6%) reported CAM use. Of these, 59% disclosed CAM use to their provider. Logistic regression models were created. In model 1 SDM significantly predicted CAM use; however, the overall model fit was not significant. In model 2, gender, ethnicity, and SDM predicted CAM disclosure with 73.2% correctly classified. Females were more likely and Hispanics were less likely to disclose CAM use. Those with higher SDM scores were more likely to disclose CAM use. SDM played a role in whether patients used CAM and disclosed CAM use to their providers. Improving SDM strategies may be especially important among patients who are least likely to disclose CAM use.</p>","PeriodicalId":89565,"journal":{"name":"Integrative medicine insights","volume":"7 ","pages":"15-22"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.4137/IMI.S10333","citationCount":"21","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Integrative medicine insights","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4137/IMI.S10333","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2012/10/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 21

Abstract

The purpose of this analysis was to assess the impact of perceived shared decision-making (SDM) on complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) use and disclosure in a sample of urban, underserved minority patients (n = 109) with rheumatic diseases. Nearly three quarters of the patients (71.6%) reported CAM use. Of these, 59% disclosed CAM use to their provider. Logistic regression models were created. In model 1 SDM significantly predicted CAM use; however, the overall model fit was not significant. In model 2, gender, ethnicity, and SDM predicted CAM disclosure with 73.2% correctly classified. Females were more likely and Hispanics were less likely to disclose CAM use. Those with higher SDM scores were more likely to disclose CAM use. SDM played a role in whether patients used CAM and disclosed CAM use to their providers. Improving SDM strategies may be especially important among patients who are least likely to disclose CAM use.

告诉还是不告诉:风湿病缺医少药患者的共同决策、CAM使用和披露。
本分析的目的是评估感知共同决策(SDM)对城市中服务不足的少数民族风湿病患者(n = 109)补充和替代医学(CAM)使用和披露的影响。近四分之三的患者(71.6%)报告使用CAM。其中,59%的人向他们的医疗服务提供者透露了使用CAM的情况。建立了逻辑回归模型。在模型1中,SDM显著预测CAM使用;然而,整体模型拟合不显著。在模型2中,性别、种族和SDM预测CAM披露的正确率为73.2%。女性更有可能,西班牙裔更不可能透露CAM的使用情况。SDM得分较高的人更有可能透露CAM的使用情况。SDM在患者是否使用CAM并向其提供者披露CAM使用情况方面发挥了作用。改进SDM策略对于那些最不可能披露CAM使用情况的患者尤其重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信