Training NIH K award recipients: the role of the mentor.

Clinical and Translational Science Pub Date : 2012-10-01 Epub Date: 2012-08-07 DOI:10.1111/j.1752-8062.2012.00436.x
Elizabeth Ripley, Monika Markowitz, Ann Nichols-Casebolt, Larry Williams, Francis Macrina
{"title":"Training NIH K award recipients: the role of the mentor.","authors":"Elizabeth Ripley,&nbsp;Monika Markowitz,&nbsp;Ann Nichols-Casebolt,&nbsp;Larry Williams,&nbsp;Francis Macrina","doi":"10.1111/j.1752-8062.2012.00436.x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Unlabelled: </strong>Mentors play important roles in training new investigators. This study was designed to determine characteristics of NIH mentored K award recipients and their mentors, their interpersonal interactions, and the factors, which influence satisfaction within this relationship.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A survey of 3027 NIH mentored K recipients and 1384 mentors was conducted in 2009. Nine hundred twenty-nine (30.7%) of the K recipients and 448 (32.4%) mentors completed the survey.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The gender of K respondents was evenly divided while the mentors were 72.1% male. The overall rating of their mentors was positive. Ideally, both thought the mentor should be important in research training; however, in actual practice, both rated the importance as lower. A total of 88.2% of recipients were satisfied with their relationship. Although the number of black K recipients was low, this group was more likely to be dissatisfied with the mentor relationship (6/29 or 20.7%) than their white counterparts. The frequency of meeting or communicating was correlated with K recipient satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Overall K recipients are satisfied with their mentor relationships. Although the number of black K recipient respondents was small, the higher level of mentor dissatisfaction should be further evaluated. Qualities of mentors, including the frequency of interactions and accessibility, can influence satisfaction.</p>","PeriodicalId":501617,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Translational Science","volume":" ","pages":"386-93"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/j.1752-8062.2012.00436.x","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and Translational Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-8062.2012.00436.x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2012/8/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Unlabelled: Mentors play important roles in training new investigators. This study was designed to determine characteristics of NIH mentored K award recipients and their mentors, their interpersonal interactions, and the factors, which influence satisfaction within this relationship.

Method: A survey of 3027 NIH mentored K recipients and 1384 mentors was conducted in 2009. Nine hundred twenty-nine (30.7%) of the K recipients and 448 (32.4%) mentors completed the survey.

Results: The gender of K respondents was evenly divided while the mentors were 72.1% male. The overall rating of their mentors was positive. Ideally, both thought the mentor should be important in research training; however, in actual practice, both rated the importance as lower. A total of 88.2% of recipients were satisfied with their relationship. Although the number of black K recipients was low, this group was more likely to be dissatisfied with the mentor relationship (6/29 or 20.7%) than their white counterparts. The frequency of meeting or communicating was correlated with K recipient satisfaction.

Conclusions: Overall K recipients are satisfied with their mentor relationships. Although the number of black K recipient respondents was small, the higher level of mentor dissatisfaction should be further evaluated. Qualities of mentors, including the frequency of interactions and accessibility, can influence satisfaction.

培训NIH K奖获得者:导师的角色。
未标记:导师在培训新调查员方面发挥着重要作用。本研究旨在探讨美国国立卫生研究院指导的K奖获得者及其导师的特征、人际互动以及影响这种关系满意度的因素。方法:2009年对3027名NIH指导K获得者和1384名导师进行调查。929名(30.7%)受助人和448名(32.4%)导师完成了调查。结果:K名被调查者性别分布均匀,导师中男性占72.1%。他们对导师的总体评价是积极的。理想情况下,两人都认为导师应该在研究培训中发挥重要作用;然而,在实际操作中,两者都认为其重要性较低。共有88.2%的接受者对他们的关系感到满意。虽然接受K的黑人人数较少,但与白人相比,这一群体更有可能对导师关系不满意(6/29或20.7%)。会面或沟通的频率与K受体满意度相关。结论:总体而言,K受训者对其导师关系感到满意。虽然接受K的黑人受访者数量较少,但对导师不满的较高水平需要进一步评估。导师的素质,包括互动的频率和可接近性,可以影响满意度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信