Adherence to COPD guidelines in general practice: impact of an educational programme delivered on location in Danish general practices.

Charlotte Suppli Ulrik, Tina Brandt Sørensen, Torben Brunse Højmark, Kim Rose Olsen, Peter Vedsted
{"title":"Adherence to COPD guidelines in general practice: impact of an educational programme delivered on location in Danish general practices.","authors":"Charlotte Suppli Ulrik,&nbsp;Tina Brandt Sørensen,&nbsp;Torben Brunse Højmark,&nbsp;Kim Rose Olsen,&nbsp;Peter Vedsted","doi":"10.4104/pcrj.2012.00089","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The general practitioner (GP) is often the first healthcare contact for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To determine whether participating in a standardised educational programme delivered in the GP's own practice is associated with adherence to COPD guidelines.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A nationwide register-based observational before and after study was undertaken with a control group of propensity-matched practices (follow-up period 6 months). COPD was defined as age 40+ years and at least two prescriptions for inhaled medication. The educational programme consisted of a 3-hr teaching lesson with a respiratory specialist and five visits by a representative from the sponsoring pharmaceutical company focusing on assessment and management of patients including written algorithms. A one-to-one propensity-matched control group of practices was selected. Register data were used to compare the rate of spirometry testing, preventive consultations, and influenza vaccinations provided to COPD patients and the rate of spirometry testing in non-COPD individuals, assumed to reflect diagnostic activity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data for 102 participating GP practices were analysed. Participating clinics had a significant increase in preventive consultations and influenza vaccinations (p<0.05). For the control group, a significant change was observed only for influenza vaccinations. No significant change was found when comparing participating and control clinics in the difference-in-difference estimator. However, a significant improvement was observed for the subgroup of 48 clinics with the lowest starting point of spirometry testing.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Focused education of GPs and their staff delivered in the GPs' own practices may improve adherence to COPD guidelines, not least for clinics with a high potential for improvement.</p>","PeriodicalId":48998,"journal":{"name":"Primary Care Respiratory Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.4104/pcrj.2012.00089","citationCount":"17","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Primary Care Respiratory Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4104/pcrj.2012.00089","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 17

Abstract

Background: The general practitioner (GP) is often the first healthcare contact for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).

Aims: To determine whether participating in a standardised educational programme delivered in the GP's own practice is associated with adherence to COPD guidelines.

Methods: A nationwide register-based observational before and after study was undertaken with a control group of propensity-matched practices (follow-up period 6 months). COPD was defined as age 40+ years and at least two prescriptions for inhaled medication. The educational programme consisted of a 3-hr teaching lesson with a respiratory specialist and five visits by a representative from the sponsoring pharmaceutical company focusing on assessment and management of patients including written algorithms. A one-to-one propensity-matched control group of practices was selected. Register data were used to compare the rate of spirometry testing, preventive consultations, and influenza vaccinations provided to COPD patients and the rate of spirometry testing in non-COPD individuals, assumed to reflect diagnostic activity.

Results: Data for 102 participating GP practices were analysed. Participating clinics had a significant increase in preventive consultations and influenza vaccinations (p<0.05). For the control group, a significant change was observed only for influenza vaccinations. No significant change was found when comparing participating and control clinics in the difference-in-difference estimator. However, a significant improvement was observed for the subgroup of 48 clinics with the lowest starting point of spirometry testing.

Conclusions: Focused education of GPs and their staff delivered in the GPs' own practices may improve adherence to COPD guidelines, not least for clinics with a high potential for improvement.

在全科实践中遵守COPD指南:丹麦全科实践中一项教育计划的影响
背景:全科医生(GP)通常是慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者的第一个医疗保健接触者。目的:确定在全科医生自己的实践中参加标准化教育计划是否与遵守COPD指南有关。方法:在全国范围内以登记为基础的研究前后观察与倾向匹配的对照组(随访期6个月)。COPD定义为年龄40岁以上且至少有两次吸入药物处方。教育方案包括由一名呼吸系统专家授课3小时,并由赞助制药公司的一名代表进行5次访问,重点是对患者的评估和管理,包括书面算法。选择一个一对一倾向匹配的实践控制组。登记资料用于比较COPD患者的肺活量测定、预防性咨询和流感疫苗接种率与非COPD个体的肺活量测定率,假设其反映诊断活动。结果:分析了102个参与全科医生实践的数据。参与研究的诊所的预防性咨询和流感疫苗接种显著增加(结论:在全科医生自己的实践中,对全科医生及其工作人员进行重点教育可以提高对COPD指南的依从性,尤其是在有很大改进潜力的诊所。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Primary Care Respiratory Journal
Primary Care Respiratory Journal PRIMARY HEALTH CARE-RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信