Review of the fibrinolytic system: comparison of different antifibrinolytics used during cardiopulmonary bypass.

Caroline Van Aelbrouck, Lars Englberger, David Faraoni
{"title":"Review of the fibrinolytic system: comparison of different antifibrinolytics used during cardiopulmonary bypass.","authors":"Caroline Van Aelbrouck,&nbsp;Lars Englberger,&nbsp;David Faraoni","doi":"10.2174/157489012803832793","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Antifibrinolytic agents are often used in different clinical situations, especially in cardiac surgery. During several years, aprotinin was the drug of choice because more than antifibrinolytic properties, aprotinin offers a direct effect on kallikrein and inflammatory pathways. In 2008, The Blood Conservation Using Antifibrinolytics in a Randomized Trial (BART) initiated a discussion about real risks associated with aprotinin administration. Tranexamic acid and epsilon-aminocaproic acid appear to be interesting alternatives in our daily practice. The exact mechanism of action, the pharmacokinetic parameters, the efficacy, and the safety profile need to be clarified for lysine analogs. In this review, the different antifibrinolytics will be described with a special interest into the route of work, and recent patents. Current studies about the pharmacokinetic and the pharmacodynamic profile will be described, and finally the benefit-to-risk balance in patients undergoing cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass will be discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":20905,"journal":{"name":"Recent patents on cardiovascular drug discovery","volume":"7 3","pages":"175-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2174/157489012803832793","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Recent patents on cardiovascular drug discovery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/157489012803832793","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

Antifibrinolytic agents are often used in different clinical situations, especially in cardiac surgery. During several years, aprotinin was the drug of choice because more than antifibrinolytic properties, aprotinin offers a direct effect on kallikrein and inflammatory pathways. In 2008, The Blood Conservation Using Antifibrinolytics in a Randomized Trial (BART) initiated a discussion about real risks associated with aprotinin administration. Tranexamic acid and epsilon-aminocaproic acid appear to be interesting alternatives in our daily practice. The exact mechanism of action, the pharmacokinetic parameters, the efficacy, and the safety profile need to be clarified for lysine analogs. In this review, the different antifibrinolytics will be described with a special interest into the route of work, and recent patents. Current studies about the pharmacokinetic and the pharmacodynamic profile will be described, and finally the benefit-to-risk balance in patients undergoing cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass will be discussed.

纤溶系统综述:体外循环中不同抗纤溶药物的比较。
抗纤溶药物经常用于不同的临床情况,特别是在心脏手术中。几年来,抑肽蛋白是首选药物,因为除抗纤溶特性外,抑肽蛋白还对钾激肽和炎症途径有直接作用。2008年,在一项随机试验中使用抗纤溶药物的血液保护(BART)引发了一场关于应用抑酶蛋白相关风险的讨论。氨甲环酸和氨基己酸在我们的日常实践中似乎是有趣的替代品。赖氨酸类似物的确切作用机制、药代动力学参数、疗效和安全性需要进一步明确。在这篇综述中,不同的抗纤溶药物将被描述为特别感兴趣的工作路线,以及最近的专利。本文将介绍目前的药代动力学和药效学研究,最后将讨论心脏手术合并体外循环患者的获益-风险平衡。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信