Cancer classification: Mutual information, target network and strategies of therapy.

Wen-Chin Hsu, Chan-Cheng Liu, Fu Chang, Su-Shing Chen
{"title":"Cancer classification: Mutual information, target network and strategies of therapy.","authors":"Wen-Chin Hsu,&nbsp;Chan-Cheng Liu,&nbsp;Fu Chang,&nbsp;Su-Shing Chen","doi":"10.1186/2043-9113-2-16","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Unlabelled: </strong></p><p><strong>Background: </strong>Cancer therapy is a challenging research area because side effects often occur in chemo and radiation therapy. We intend to study a multi-targets and multi-components design that will provide synergistic results to improve efficiency of cancer therapy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We have developed a general methodology, AMFES (Adaptive Multiple FEature Selection), for ranking and selecting important cancer biomarkers based on SVM (Support Vector Machine) classification. In particular, we exemplify this method by three datasets: a prostate cancer (three stages), a breast cancer (four subtypes), and another prostate cancer (normal vs. cancerous). Moreover, we have computed the target networks of these biomarkers as the signatures of the cancers with additional information (mutual information between biomarkers of the network). Then, we proposed a robust framework for synergistic therapy design approach which includes varies existing mechanisms.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>These methodologies were applied to three GEO datasets: GSE18655 (three prostate stages), GSE19536 (4 subtypes breast cancers) and GSE21036 (prostate cancer cells and normal cells) shown in. We selected 96 biomarkers for first prostate cancer dataset (three prostate stages), 72 for breast cancer (luminal A vs. luminal B), 68 for breast cancer (basal-like vs. normal-like), and 22 for another prostate cancer (cancerous vs. normal. In addition, we obtained statistically significant results of mutual information, which demonstrate that the dependencies among these biomarkers can be positive or negative.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We proposed an efficient feature ranking and selection scheme, AMFES, to select an important subset from a large number of features for any cancer dataset. Thus, we obtained the signatures of these cancers by building their target networks. Finally, we proposed a robust framework of synergistic therapy for cancer patients. Our framework is not only supported by real GEO datasets but also aim to a multi-targets/multi-components drug design tool, which improves the traditional single target/single component analysis methods. This framework builds a computational foundation which can provide a clear classification of cancers and lead to an efficient cancer therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":73663,"journal":{"name":"Journal of clinical bioinformatics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/2043-9113-2-16","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of clinical bioinformatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/2043-9113-2-16","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

Unlabelled:

Background: Cancer therapy is a challenging research area because side effects often occur in chemo and radiation therapy. We intend to study a multi-targets and multi-components design that will provide synergistic results to improve efficiency of cancer therapy.

Methods: We have developed a general methodology, AMFES (Adaptive Multiple FEature Selection), for ranking and selecting important cancer biomarkers based on SVM (Support Vector Machine) classification. In particular, we exemplify this method by three datasets: a prostate cancer (three stages), a breast cancer (four subtypes), and another prostate cancer (normal vs. cancerous). Moreover, we have computed the target networks of these biomarkers as the signatures of the cancers with additional information (mutual information between biomarkers of the network). Then, we proposed a robust framework for synergistic therapy design approach which includes varies existing mechanisms.

Results: These methodologies were applied to three GEO datasets: GSE18655 (three prostate stages), GSE19536 (4 subtypes breast cancers) and GSE21036 (prostate cancer cells and normal cells) shown in. We selected 96 biomarkers for first prostate cancer dataset (three prostate stages), 72 for breast cancer (luminal A vs. luminal B), 68 for breast cancer (basal-like vs. normal-like), and 22 for another prostate cancer (cancerous vs. normal. In addition, we obtained statistically significant results of mutual information, which demonstrate that the dependencies among these biomarkers can be positive or negative.

Conclusions: We proposed an efficient feature ranking and selection scheme, AMFES, to select an important subset from a large number of features for any cancer dataset. Thus, we obtained the signatures of these cancers by building their target networks. Finally, we proposed a robust framework of synergistic therapy for cancer patients. Our framework is not only supported by real GEO datasets but also aim to a multi-targets/multi-components drug design tool, which improves the traditional single target/single component analysis methods. This framework builds a computational foundation which can provide a clear classification of cancers and lead to an efficient cancer therapy.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

肿瘤分类:相互信息、靶点网络和治疗策略。
背景:癌症治疗是一个具有挑战性的研究领域,因为化疗和放疗经常发生副作用。我们打算研究一种多靶点和多组分的设计,将提供协同结果,以提高癌症治疗的效率。方法:我们开发了一种通用的方法,AMFES(自适应多特征选择),用于基于SVM(支持向量机)分类对重要的癌症生物标志物进行排序和选择。特别地,我们通过三个数据集举例说明了这种方法:前列腺癌(三个阶段),乳腺癌(四个亚型)和另一种前列腺癌(正常与癌)。此外,我们还计算了这些生物标志物的目标网络作为癌症的附加信息(网络生物标志物之间的相互信息)的特征。然后,我们提出了一个强大的框架的协同治疗设计方法,其中包括各种现有的机制。结果:这些方法应用于三个GEO数据集:GSE18655(三个前列腺分期),GSE19536(4种乳腺癌亚型)和GSE21036(前列腺癌细胞和正常细胞)。我们为第一个前列腺癌数据集选择了96个生物标志物(三个前列腺分期),72个用于乳腺癌(管腔A与管腔B), 68个用于乳腺癌(基底样与正常样),22个用于另一种前列腺癌(癌与正常)。此外,我们获得了统计上显著的互信息结果,这表明这些生物标志物之间的依赖关系可以是正的,也可以是负的。结论:我们提出了一种高效的特征排序和选择方案AMFES,可以从任何癌症数据集的大量特征中选择一个重要的子集。因此,我们通过建立目标网络获得了这些癌症的特征。最后,我们提出了一个强有力的框架,为癌症患者的协同治疗。该框架不仅得到了真实GEO数据集的支持,而且旨在建立一个多靶点/多成分的药物设计工具,从而改进了传统的单靶点/单成分分析方法。这个框架建立了一个计算基础,可以提供一个清晰的癌症分类,并导致一个有效的癌症治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信