Modeling volatilization and adsorption of disinfection byproducts in natural watersheds.

Wenbiao Jin, Jin Zhou, Baiyang Chen, Xiaoshan Zhu, Chongwei Cui
{"title":"Modeling volatilization and adsorption of disinfection byproducts in natural watersheds.","authors":"Wenbiao Jin,&nbsp;Jin Zhou,&nbsp;Baiyang Chen,&nbsp;Xiaoshan Zhu,&nbsp;Chongwei Cui","doi":"10.1039/c2em30617d","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>It is an emerging concern that a series of disinfection byproducts (DBPs) produced in wastewater effluent have adversely impacted the downstream aquatic system and drinking water resources. The occurrence, fate, and transport of DBPs on receiving waterbodies, however, are currently not well-documented. To fill the knowledge gap, this study simulated the effects of volatilization and adsorption processes on the removals of DBPs (THM, HAA, HAN, HNM, and NA) in different types of watersheds (lake, stream, river, and aquifer). The effects of a series of variables, including hydrogeological characteristics (e.g., water depth, flow rate, roughness), environmental conditions (e.g., temperature, wind velocity), and chemical properties (e.g., octanol-water partition coefficient, Henry's law constant, molecular weight, density) were evaluated and their relative importance were compared. The results indicate that volatilization mechanism was preferred in the stream-type watershed and effective in reducing THMs, but unlikely to reduce HAAs. Adsorption and removal of DBPs on settling suspended solid in surface waters appears insignificant, accounting for less than 8% of the DBP content. Adsorption of DBPs on aquifer soil does not reduce DBPs directly; nonetheless, it reduces the mobility of DBPs in the aquifer and provides a place for other mechanisms to degrade/transform DBPs. The results of this study therefore may help understand the occurrence, fate, and risk of wastewater-derived DBPs in downstream waterbodies, and trigger more laboratory tests in the future to dedicate to the mechanisms and DBPs with significant impact.</p>","PeriodicalId":50202,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Environmental Monitoring","volume":"14 11","pages":"2990-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1039/c2em30617d","citationCount":"21","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Environmental Monitoring","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1039/c2em30617d","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 21

Abstract

It is an emerging concern that a series of disinfection byproducts (DBPs) produced in wastewater effluent have adversely impacted the downstream aquatic system and drinking water resources. The occurrence, fate, and transport of DBPs on receiving waterbodies, however, are currently not well-documented. To fill the knowledge gap, this study simulated the effects of volatilization and adsorption processes on the removals of DBPs (THM, HAA, HAN, HNM, and NA) in different types of watersheds (lake, stream, river, and aquifer). The effects of a series of variables, including hydrogeological characteristics (e.g., water depth, flow rate, roughness), environmental conditions (e.g., temperature, wind velocity), and chemical properties (e.g., octanol-water partition coefficient, Henry's law constant, molecular weight, density) were evaluated and their relative importance were compared. The results indicate that volatilization mechanism was preferred in the stream-type watershed and effective in reducing THMs, but unlikely to reduce HAAs. Adsorption and removal of DBPs on settling suspended solid in surface waters appears insignificant, accounting for less than 8% of the DBP content. Adsorption of DBPs on aquifer soil does not reduce DBPs directly; nonetheless, it reduces the mobility of DBPs in the aquifer and provides a place for other mechanisms to degrade/transform DBPs. The results of this study therefore may help understand the occurrence, fate, and risk of wastewater-derived DBPs in downstream waterbodies, and trigger more laboratory tests in the future to dedicate to the mechanisms and DBPs with significant impact.

模拟自然流域消毒副产物的挥发和吸附。
废水排放中产生的一系列消毒副产物(DBPs)对下游水生系统和饮用水资源产生了不利影响,这是一个日益关注的问题。然而,dbp在接收水体上的发生、命运和运输目前没有很好的记录。为了填补这一知识空白,本研究模拟了挥发和吸附过程对不同类型流域(湖泊、溪流、河流和含水层)中DBPs (THM、HAA、HAN、HNM和NA)去除的影响。评价了水文地质特征(如水深、流量、粗糙度)、环境条件(如温度、风速)和化学性质(如辛醇-水分配系数、亨利定律常数、分子量、密度)等一系列变量的影响,并比较了它们的相对重要性。结果表明,径流型流域以挥发机制为主,对降低THMs有效,但对降低HAAs作用不大。DBP对地表水沉降悬浮物的吸附和去除作用不明显,占DBP含量的8%以下。DBPs在含水层土壤上的吸附不会直接降低DBPs;然而,它降低了dbp在含水层中的流动性,并为其他机制降解/转化dbp提供了空间。因此,本研究的结果可能有助于了解废水来源的dbp在下游水体中的发生、命运和风险,并在未来引发更多的实验室测试,致力于具有重大影响的机制和dbp。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Environmental Monitoring
Journal of Environmental Monitoring 环境科学-分析化学
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
2.3 months
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信