Effect of residents' previous laparoscopic surgery experience on initial robotic suturing experience.

ISRN obstetrics and gynecology Pub Date : 2012-01-01 Epub Date: 2012-09-02 DOI:10.5402/2012/569456
Gokhan Sami Kilic, Teresa M Walsh, Mostafa Borahay, Burak Zeybek, Michael Wen, Daniel Breitkopf
{"title":"Effect of residents' previous laparoscopic surgery experience on initial robotic suturing experience.","authors":"Gokhan Sami Kilic,&nbsp;Teresa M Walsh,&nbsp;Mostafa Borahay,&nbsp;Burak Zeybek,&nbsp;Michael Wen,&nbsp;Daniel Breitkopf","doi":"10.5402/2012/569456","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Objective. To assess the impact of gynecology residents' previous laparoscopic experience on the learning curve of robotic suturing techniques and the value of initial structured teaching in dry lab prior to surgery. Methods. Thirteen gynecology residents with no previous robotic surgery experience were divided into Group 1, consisting of residents with 2 or fewer laparoscopic experiences, and Group 2, consisting of residents with 3 or more laparoscopic experiences. Group 1 had a dry-laboratory training in suturing prior to their initial experience in the operating room. Results. For all residents, it took on average 382 ± 159 seconds for laparoscopic suturing and 326 ± 196 seconds for robotic suturing (P = 0.12). Residents in Group 1 had a lower mean suture time than residents in Group 2 for laparoscopic suturing (P = 0.009). The residents in Group 2, however, had a lower mean suture time on the robot compared to Group 1 (P = 0.5). Conclusion. Residents with previous laparoscopic suturing experience may gain more from a robotic surgery experience than those with limited laparoscopic surgery experience. In addition, dry lab training is more efficient than hands-on training in the initial phase of teaching for both laparoscopic and robotic suturing skills.</p>","PeriodicalId":73520,"journal":{"name":"ISRN obstetrics and gynecology","volume":"2012 ","pages":"569456"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.5402/2012/569456","citationCount":"30","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ISRN obstetrics and gynecology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5402/2012/569456","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2012/9/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 30

Abstract

Objective. To assess the impact of gynecology residents' previous laparoscopic experience on the learning curve of robotic suturing techniques and the value of initial structured teaching in dry lab prior to surgery. Methods. Thirteen gynecology residents with no previous robotic surgery experience were divided into Group 1, consisting of residents with 2 or fewer laparoscopic experiences, and Group 2, consisting of residents with 3 or more laparoscopic experiences. Group 1 had a dry-laboratory training in suturing prior to their initial experience in the operating room. Results. For all residents, it took on average 382 ± 159 seconds for laparoscopic suturing and 326 ± 196 seconds for robotic suturing (P = 0.12). Residents in Group 1 had a lower mean suture time than residents in Group 2 for laparoscopic suturing (P = 0.009). The residents in Group 2, however, had a lower mean suture time on the robot compared to Group 1 (P = 0.5). Conclusion. Residents with previous laparoscopic suturing experience may gain more from a robotic surgery experience than those with limited laparoscopic surgery experience. In addition, dry lab training is more efficient than hands-on training in the initial phase of teaching for both laparoscopic and robotic suturing skills.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

住院医师以往腹腔镜手术经验对初次机器人缝合经验的影响。
目标。评估妇科住院医师以往腹腔镜经验对机器人缝合技术学习曲线的影响,以及术前在干实验室进行初步结构化教学的价值。方法。将13名没有机器人手术经验的妇科住院医师分为有2次及以下腹腔镜手术经验的第1组和有3次及以上腹腔镜手术经验的第2组。第一组患者在进入手术室前接受过缝合方面的干实验室培训。结果。所有住院医师腹腔镜缝合平均耗时382±159秒,机器人缝合平均耗时326±196秒(P = 0.12)。组1的平均缝合时间低于组2的缝合时间(P = 0.009)。然而,与组1相比,组2的住院医生在机器人上的平均缝合时间更短(P = 0.5)。结论。以前有过腹腔镜缝合经验的住院医生可能比那些没有腹腔镜手术经验的人从机器人手术中获得更多的经验。此外,在腹腔镜和机器人缝合技能教学的初始阶段,干实验室训练比动手训练更有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信