Patient-Reported Selective Adherence to Heart Failure Self-Care Recommendations: A Prospective Cohort Study: The Atlanta Cardiomyopathy Consortium

Catherine N. Marti MD, Vasiliki V. Georgiopoulou MD, Grigorios Giamouzis MD, PhD, Robert T. Cole MD, Anjan Deka MD, W. H. W. Tang MD, Sandra B. Dunbar RN, DSN, Andrew L. Smith MD, Andreas P. Kalogeropoulos MD, Javed Butler MD, MPH
{"title":"Patient-Reported Selective Adherence to Heart Failure Self-Care Recommendations: A Prospective Cohort Study: The Atlanta Cardiomyopathy Consortium","authors":"Catherine N. Marti MD,&nbsp;Vasiliki V. Georgiopoulou MD,&nbsp;Grigorios Giamouzis MD, PhD,&nbsp;Robert T. Cole MD,&nbsp;Anjan Deka MD,&nbsp;W. H. W. Tang MD,&nbsp;Sandra B. Dunbar RN, DSN,&nbsp;Andrew L. Smith MD,&nbsp;Andreas P. Kalogeropoulos MD,&nbsp;Javed Butler MD, MPH","doi":"10.1111/j.1751-7133.2012.00308.x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>©2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</p><p>Simultaneous adherence with multiple self-care instructions among heart failure (HF) patients is not well described. Patient-reported adherence to 8 recommendations related to exercise, alcohol, medications, smoking, diet, weight, and symptoms was assessed among 308 HF patients using the Medical Outcomes Study Specific Adherence Scale questionnaire (0=“never” to 5=“always,” maximum score=40). A baseline cumulative score of ≥32/40 (average ≥80%) defined good adherence. Clinical events (death/transplantation/ventricular assist device), resource utilization, functional capacity (6-minute walk distance), and health status (Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire [KCCQ]) were compared among patients with and without good adherence. The mean follow-up was 2.0±1.0 years, and adherence ranged from 26.3% (exercise) to 89.9% (medications). A cumulative score indicating good adherence was reported by 35.7%, whereas good adherence with every behavior was reported by 9.1% of patients. Good adherence was associated with fewer hospitalizations (all-cause 87.8 vs 107.6; <i>P</i>=.018; HF 29.6 vs 43.8; <i>P</i>=.007) and hospitalized days (all-cause 422 vs 465; <i>P</i>=.015; HF 228 vs 282; <i>P</i>&lt;.001) per 100-person-years and better health status (KCCQ overall score 70.1±24.6 vs 63.8±22.8; <i>P</i>=.011). Adherence was not associated with clinical events or functional capacity. Patient-reported adherence with HF self-care recommendations is alarmingly low and selective. Good adherence was associated with lower resource utilization and better health status.</p>","PeriodicalId":83668,"journal":{"name":"Congestive heart failure (Greenwich, Conn.)","volume":"19 1","pages":"16-24"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/j.1751-7133.2012.00308.x","citationCount":"81","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Congestive heart failure (Greenwich, Conn.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1751-7133.2012.00308.x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 81

Abstract

©2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Simultaneous adherence with multiple self-care instructions among heart failure (HF) patients is not well described. Patient-reported adherence to 8 recommendations related to exercise, alcohol, medications, smoking, diet, weight, and symptoms was assessed among 308 HF patients using the Medical Outcomes Study Specific Adherence Scale questionnaire (0=“never” to 5=“always,” maximum score=40). A baseline cumulative score of ≥32/40 (average ≥80%) defined good adherence. Clinical events (death/transplantation/ventricular assist device), resource utilization, functional capacity (6-minute walk distance), and health status (Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire [KCCQ]) were compared among patients with and without good adherence. The mean follow-up was 2.0±1.0 years, and adherence ranged from 26.3% (exercise) to 89.9% (medications). A cumulative score indicating good adherence was reported by 35.7%, whereas good adherence with every behavior was reported by 9.1% of patients. Good adherence was associated with fewer hospitalizations (all-cause 87.8 vs 107.6; P=.018; HF 29.6 vs 43.8; P=.007) and hospitalized days (all-cause 422 vs 465; P=.015; HF 228 vs 282; P<.001) per 100-person-years and better health status (KCCQ overall score 70.1±24.6 vs 63.8±22.8; P=.011). Adherence was not associated with clinical events or functional capacity. Patient-reported adherence with HF self-care recommendations is alarmingly low and selective. Good adherence was associated with lower resource utilization and better health status.

Abstract Image

患者报告的选择性坚持心力衰竭自我护理建议:一项前瞻性队列研究:亚特兰大心肌病协会
©2012 Wiley期刊,inc .在心力衰竭(HF)患者中同时遵守多种自我护理指导的情况并没有得到很好的描述。采用医学结局研究特定依从性量表问卷(0=“从不”至5=“总是”,最高分=40)对308例HF患者报告的与运动、酒精、药物、吸烟、饮食、体重和症状相关的8项建议的依从性进行评估。基线累积评分≥32/40(平均≥80%)定义良好的依从性。比较临床事件(死亡/移植/心室辅助装置)、资源利用、功能能力(6分钟步行距离)和健康状况(堪萨斯城心肌病问卷[KCCQ])。平均随访2.0±1.0年,依从性从26.3%(运动)到89.9%(药物)不等。35.7%的患者报告了良好的依从性累积评分,而9.1%的患者报告了良好的每项行为依从性。良好的依从性与较少的住院率相关(全因87.8 vs 107.6;P = .018;HF 29.6 vs 43.8;P=.007)和住院天数(全因422 vs 465;P = .015;HF 228 vs 282;p < 0.01)和更好的健康状况(KCCQ总分70.1±24.6 vs 63.8±22.8;P = .011)。依从性与临床事件或功能能力无关。患者报告的心衰自我保健建议的依从性低得惊人,而且是选择性的。良好的依从性与较低的资源利用率和较好的健康状况相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书