Is Exercise Training Beneficial for Heart Failure Patients Taking β-Adrenergic Blockers? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Hashbullah Ismail MA, James McFarlane PhD, Neil A. Smart PhD
{"title":"Is Exercise Training Beneficial for Heart Failure Patients Taking β-Adrenergic Blockers? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis","authors":"Hashbullah Ismail MA,&nbsp;James McFarlane PhD,&nbsp;Neil A. Smart PhD","doi":"10.1111/chf.12000","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The authors sought to conduct a systematic review comparing the effects of exercise training in heart failure patients taking β-blockers vs those not. A systematic search of exercise training trials in chronic heart failure patients that compared groups who took β-blocker medication or compared selective and nonselective β-blockers during exercise training was conducted. Eight prospective studies met the criteria for the quantitative synthesis, which included data from 236 participants. The increment in peak oxygen consumption (VO<sub>2</sub>) was greater in exercising vs control participants, with a mean difference (MD) of 1.27 mL/kg/min (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.85–1.70; P&lt;.00001). In exercising patients, the increment in peak VO<sub>2</sub> was greater in the group taking β-blocker vs those taking placebo (MD, 1.66 mL/kg/min; 95% CI, 0.36–2.97; <i>P</i>=.01). In exercising patients, there was no difference in the increment of peak VO<sub>2</sub> between nonselective β-blocker and selective β-blockers groups (MD, −0.09 mL/kg/min; 95% CI, −1.54–1.36; <i>P</i>=.09). Minnesota Quality of Life Score was significantly better in the exercise group vs sedentary control group (both groups taking β-blockers) (MD, −11.3; 95% CI, −15.9 to −6.8; <i>P</i>&lt;.00001). Our analysis demonstrated that β-adrenergic blocker therapy did not reduce exercise capacity or exercise training adaptations and quality of life in heart failure patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":83668,"journal":{"name":"Congestive heart failure (Greenwich, Conn.)","volume":"19 2","pages":"61-69"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/chf.12000","citationCount":"13","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Congestive heart failure (Greenwich, Conn.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/chf.12000","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

Abstract

The authors sought to conduct a systematic review comparing the effects of exercise training in heart failure patients taking β-blockers vs those not. A systematic search of exercise training trials in chronic heart failure patients that compared groups who took β-blocker medication or compared selective and nonselective β-blockers during exercise training was conducted. Eight prospective studies met the criteria for the quantitative synthesis, which included data from 236 participants. The increment in peak oxygen consumption (VO2) was greater in exercising vs control participants, with a mean difference (MD) of 1.27 mL/kg/min (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.85–1.70; P<.00001). In exercising patients, the increment in peak VO2 was greater in the group taking β-blocker vs those taking placebo (MD, 1.66 mL/kg/min; 95% CI, 0.36–2.97; P=.01). In exercising patients, there was no difference in the increment of peak VO2 between nonselective β-blocker and selective β-blockers groups (MD, −0.09 mL/kg/min; 95% CI, −1.54–1.36; P=.09). Minnesota Quality of Life Score was significantly better in the exercise group vs sedentary control group (both groups taking β-blockers) (MD, −11.3; 95% CI, −15.9 to −6.8; P<.00001). Our analysis demonstrated that β-adrenergic blocker therapy did not reduce exercise capacity or exercise training adaptations and quality of life in heart failure patients.

Abstract Image

运动训练对服用β-肾上腺素受体阻滞剂的心力衰竭患者有益吗?系统回顾和荟萃分析
作者试图进行一项系统的综述,比较运动训练对服用β受体阻滞剂和未服用β受体阻滞剂的心力衰竭患者的影响。对慢性心力衰竭患者的运动训练试验进行了系统的搜索,比较了在运动训练中服用β受体阻滞剂药物的组或比较了选择性和非选择性β受体阻滞剂的组。8项前瞻性研究符合定量综合的标准,其中包括来自236名参与者的数据。与对照组相比,运动组的峰值耗氧量(VO2)增加更大,平均差异(MD)为1.27 mL/kg/min(95%置信区间[CI], 0.85-1.70;术;.00001)。在运动患者中,服用β受体阻滞剂组的VO2峰值增量大于服用安慰剂组(MD, 1.66 mL/kg/min;95% ci, 0.36-2.97;P = . 01)。在运动患者中,非选择性β受体阻滞剂组和选择性β受体阻滞剂组的峰值VO2增量无差异(MD,−0.09 mL/kg/min;95% ci,−1.54-1.36;P = .09点)。运动组的明尼苏达生活质量评分明显优于久坐对照组(两组均服用β受体阻滞剂)(MD,−11.3;95% CI,−15.9 ~−6.8;术;.00001)。我们的分析表明,β-肾上腺素受体阻滞剂治疗不会降低心力衰竭患者的运动能力或运动训练适应性和生活质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书