Substitution Monotherapy With Levetiracetam vs Older Antiepileptic Drugs: A Randomized Comparative Trial.

Tahir Hakami, Marian Todaro, Slave Petrovski, Lachlan Macgregor, Dennis Velakoulis, Meng Tan, Zelko Matkovic, Alexandra Gorelik, Danny Liew, Raju Yerra, Terence J O'Brien
{"title":"Substitution Monotherapy With Levetiracetam vs Older Antiepileptic Drugs: A Randomized Comparative Trial.","authors":"Tahir Hakami,&nbsp;Marian Todaro,&nbsp;Slave Petrovski,&nbsp;Lachlan Macgregor,&nbsp;Dennis Velakoulis,&nbsp;Meng Tan,&nbsp;Zelko Matkovic,&nbsp;Alexandra Gorelik,&nbsp;Danny Liew,&nbsp;Raju Yerra,&nbsp;Terence J O'Brien","doi":"10.1001/archneurol.2012.2203","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>OBJECTIVE To determine whether patients who fail their first antiepileptic drug (AED) have better neuropsychiatric and quality-of-life (QOL) outcomes if substituted to levetiracetam monotherapy compared with a second older AED. DESIGN Randomized comparative trial. Participants with partial epilepsy who had failed monotherapy with phenytoin sodium, carbamazepine, or valproate sodium were randomized to substitution monotherapy with levetiracetam or a different older AED. Assessments were performed at baseline, 3 months, and 12 months using questionnaires measuring neuropsychiatric, QOL, seizure control, AED adverse effects, and neurocognitive outcomes. SETTING Epilepsy service of a teaching hospital. PATIENTS Fifty-one patients were randomized to levetiracetam and 48 were randomized to a second older AED (25 to valproate and 23 to carbamazepine). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Proportions showing improvements in depression (on the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale) and QOL scores (on the 89-item Quality of Life in Epilepsy Inventory) at 3 months. RESULTS There were no differences between the groups in depression scores at 3 months (improvement in 17 of 43 patients [39.5%] in the levetiracetam group and 15 of 44 patients [34.1%] in the older AED group; P = .60), but a greater proportion of the older AED group improved on the 89-item Quality of Life in Epilepsy Inventory compared with the levetiracetam group (27 of 38 patients [71.1%] vs 21 of 43 patients [48.8%], respectively; P = .04). The QOL, anxiety, and AED adverse effects scores were improved in both groups at 3 and 12 months after randomization. CONCLUSIONS Substitution monotherapy in a patient experiencing ongoing seizures or tolerability issues is associated with sustained improvements in measures of QOL, psychiatric, and adverse events outcomes. Patients switched to levetiracetam do not have better outcomes than those switched to a second older AED. TRIAL REGISTRATION anzctr.org.au Identifier: ACTRN12606000102572.</p>","PeriodicalId":8321,"journal":{"name":"Archives of neurology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1001/archneurol.2012.2203","citationCount":"23","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of neurology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/archneurol.2012.2203","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 23

Abstract

OBJECTIVE To determine whether patients who fail their first antiepileptic drug (AED) have better neuropsychiatric and quality-of-life (QOL) outcomes if substituted to levetiracetam monotherapy compared with a second older AED. DESIGN Randomized comparative trial. Participants with partial epilepsy who had failed monotherapy with phenytoin sodium, carbamazepine, or valproate sodium were randomized to substitution monotherapy with levetiracetam or a different older AED. Assessments were performed at baseline, 3 months, and 12 months using questionnaires measuring neuropsychiatric, QOL, seizure control, AED adverse effects, and neurocognitive outcomes. SETTING Epilepsy service of a teaching hospital. PATIENTS Fifty-one patients were randomized to levetiracetam and 48 were randomized to a second older AED (25 to valproate and 23 to carbamazepine). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Proportions showing improvements in depression (on the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale) and QOL scores (on the 89-item Quality of Life in Epilepsy Inventory) at 3 months. RESULTS There were no differences between the groups in depression scores at 3 months (improvement in 17 of 43 patients [39.5%] in the levetiracetam group and 15 of 44 patients [34.1%] in the older AED group; P = .60), but a greater proportion of the older AED group improved on the 89-item Quality of Life in Epilepsy Inventory compared with the levetiracetam group (27 of 38 patients [71.1%] vs 21 of 43 patients [48.8%], respectively; P = .04). The QOL, anxiety, and AED adverse effects scores were improved in both groups at 3 and 12 months after randomization. CONCLUSIONS Substitution monotherapy in a patient experiencing ongoing seizures or tolerability issues is associated with sustained improvements in measures of QOL, psychiatric, and adverse events outcomes. Patients switched to levetiracetam do not have better outcomes than those switched to a second older AED. TRIAL REGISTRATION anzctr.org.au Identifier: ACTRN12606000102572.

左乙拉西坦替代单药治疗与较老的抗癫痫药物:一项随机比较试验。
目的:研究首次使用抗癫痫药物(AED)失败的患者,与第二次使用AED的患者相比,左乙拉西坦单药治疗是否具有更好的神经精神病学和生活质量(QOL)结果。设计:随机比较试验。用苯妥英钠、卡马西平或丙戊酸钠单药治疗失败的部分癫痫患者随机接受左乙拉西坦替代单药治疗或使用不同的老式AED。在基线、3个月和12个月进行评估,使用问卷测量神经精神病学、生活质量、癫痫控制、AED不良反应和神经认知结果。背景:某教学医院癫痫科。51例患者随机分配到左乙拉西坦组,48例随机分配到第二个较老的AED组(25例丙戊酸钠组,23例卡马西平组)。3个月时抑郁症(医院焦虑和抑郁量表)和生活质量评分(癫痫量表89项生活质量)改善的比例。结果3个月时两组患者抑郁评分无差异(左乙拉西坦组43例患者中有17例(39.5%)改善,老年AED组44例患者中有15例(34.1%)改善;P = .60),但与左乙拉西坦组相比,老年AED组在癫痫量表89项生活质量方面改善的比例更高(38例患者中有27例[71.1%]对43例患者中有21例[48.8%];p = .04)。随机分组后3个月和12个月,两组的生活质量、焦虑和AED不良反应评分均有所改善。结论:在持续发作或耐受性问题的患者中,替代单药治疗与生活质量、精神病学和不良事件结局的持续改善有关。切换到左乙拉西坦的患者并不比切换到第二个较老的AED的患者有更好的结果。试验注册号:ACTRN12606000102572。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Archives of neurology
Archives of neurology 医学-临床神经学
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信