Biomarkers in toxicology and risk assessment.

Q2 Medicine
Bruce A Fowler
{"title":"Biomarkers in toxicology and risk assessment.","authors":"Bruce A Fowler","doi":"10.1007/978-3-7643-8340-4_16","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Over the last 30 years, the field of biomarkers has greatly expanded as early and specific endpoints for monitoring cellular responses to various disease states and exposures to drugs and chemical agents. They have enjoyed some success as predictors of health outcomes for a number of clinical diseases, but the application to chemical exposure risk assessments has been more limited. Biomarkers may be classified into categories of markers of exposure, effect, and susceptibility. Currently, \"omics\" biomarkers (i.e., genomic, proteomic, and metabolomic/metabonomic) are the major classes of biomarkers under development. These markers represent a continuum of cellular responses to drug or chemical exposures and provide linkages to mechanisms of cell injury/cell death or carcinogenic transformation. On the other hand, translation and application of these biomarkers for risk assessment has been limited due to validation and interpretation issues that need to be addressed in order for these potentially extremely valuable endpoints to reach their full potential as predictive tools for public health. This short chapter will briefly review these three \"omics\" biomarker classes and examine some validation/translation aspects needed in order for them to reach their full potential and acceptance as valuable tools for application to risk assessment.</p>","PeriodicalId":36906,"journal":{"name":"Experientia supplementum (2012)","volume":"101 ","pages":"459-70"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/978-3-7643-8340-4_16","citationCount":"26","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Experientia supplementum (2012)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7643-8340-4_16","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 26

Abstract

Over the last 30 years, the field of biomarkers has greatly expanded as early and specific endpoints for monitoring cellular responses to various disease states and exposures to drugs and chemical agents. They have enjoyed some success as predictors of health outcomes for a number of clinical diseases, but the application to chemical exposure risk assessments has been more limited. Biomarkers may be classified into categories of markers of exposure, effect, and susceptibility. Currently, "omics" biomarkers (i.e., genomic, proteomic, and metabolomic/metabonomic) are the major classes of biomarkers under development. These markers represent a continuum of cellular responses to drug or chemical exposures and provide linkages to mechanisms of cell injury/cell death or carcinogenic transformation. On the other hand, translation and application of these biomarkers for risk assessment has been limited due to validation and interpretation issues that need to be addressed in order for these potentially extremely valuable endpoints to reach their full potential as predictive tools for public health. This short chapter will briefly review these three "omics" biomarker classes and examine some validation/translation aspects needed in order for them to reach their full potential and acceptance as valuable tools for application to risk assessment.

毒理学和风险评估中的生物标志物。
在过去的30年里,生物标志物领域已经大大扩展,作为监测细胞对各种疾病状态和暴露于药物和化学制剂的反应的早期和特异性终点。作为一些临床疾病的健康结果的预测指标,它们取得了一些成功,但在化学品接触风险评估方面的应用较为有限。生物标记物可分为暴露标记物、效应标记物和易感性标记物。目前,“组学”生物标志物(即基因组学、蛋白质组学和代谢组学/代谢组学)是正在开发的生物标志物的主要类别。这些标记代表了细胞对药物或化学物质暴露的连续反应,并提供了与细胞损伤/细胞死亡或致癌转化机制的联系。另一方面,这些生物标志物用于风险评估的翻译和应用受到限制,因为需要解决验证和解释问题,以便使这些潜在的极有价值的终点充分发挥其作为公共卫生预测工具的潜力。这一简短的章节将简要回顾这三种“组学”生物标志物类别,并检查一些验证/翻译方面的需要,以便它们充分发挥其潜力,并被接受为应用于风险评估的有价值的工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Experientia supplementum (2012)
Experientia supplementum (2012) Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
24
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信